T-Mobile Phone Upgrade Choices: Motorola v.188 or Motorola RAZR v3
Honestly all, is the Motorola RAZR v3 really that much better than the Motorola v.188? I completely understand and am aware of the differences in features between these 2 models (i.e., Having bluetooth and camera in the RAZR vs. none of that in the v.188 but both have quad band) but in terms of the basic use for SMS/Photo Messaging, making/receiving phone calls, as well as the overall look and feel (phone's construction and feel, etc) is their really any difference? Opinions appreciated?
P.S. - I am looking to upgrade from Siemens CF62T phone so you can pretty much feel my pain their.
P.S. - I am looking to upgrade from Siemens CF62T phone so you can pretty much feel my pain their.
...
😉
Please enlighten me. I am curious to know what other differences are there to be aware of. My only hesitation for not going to the RAZR is the fact that I'm cash strapped right now. Too many things going on at homes that I'd like to be able to get by on the least expense here. And before anyone starts the freeby conversation topic, No, I'm not one of those cheapskates who call naggingly to Cust Care wanting top of hte line stuff for peanuts; I'm just looking to make the best possible choice for my situation at hand, end of story.
Again all opinions are appreciated! :-)
Please enlighten me. I am curious to know what other differences are there to be aware of. My only hesitation for not going to the RAZR is the fact that I'm cash strapped right now. Too many things going on at homes that I'd like to be able to get by on the least expense here. And before anyone starts the freeby conversation topic, No, I'm not one of those cheapskates who call naggingly to Cust Care wanting top of hte line stuff for peanuts; I'm just looking to make the best possible choice for my situation at hand, end of story.
Again all opinions are appreciated! :-)
...
Sorry for the sarcasm, but the differences are really based on whether you're a gadget geek or not. For one the V3 has a camera and video capture (t-mo only). It is also made of metal and glass versus the standard plastic. The form of the V3 has been considered fashion, which even thought the V188 looks kind of cool, it's no comparison in fashion. Now on the other hand, the V188 has good battery life and is still a quad band phone. It isn't as thin as the V3, but it is a very small phone and light weight. If you don't need a camera or fashion, the V188 will work just peachy. 🙂
...
I have the V188 after having to do a warranty exchange of 2 Samsung e315s and I have no complaints so far.
I get good reception (even in the stairwell of a high rise office building) and I like that my phone is capable of sending and receiving short emails without having to use Mobile Web.
Like you, I can't upgrade to a more high-end phone yet, but I think the V188 will get me by until next year.
I get good reception (even in the stairwell of a high rise office building) and I like that my phone is capable of sending and receiving short emails without having to use Mobile Web.
Like you, I can't upgrade to a more high-end phone yet, but I think the V188 will get me by until next year.
...
I just ordered the upgrade (Motorola v. 18😎 from Customer Care and they were able to match the internet upgrade with 1 year contract extension price ($20 - a $20 mail in rebate = $0; actually just the tax; $1.65 on $20).
Considering I am going away from the Siemens
C(rap) F(one 62 T(rash), I am hopeful but with tempered expectations that this Motorola v.188 can do better from a reception point of view compared to the P.O.C I already have. I am glad and grateful for the 14 day trial period and if this doesn't work then I am returning it. Anyone who has this phone currently, please provide feedback, one way or the other (i.e., just how is this phone?)
Considering I am going away from the Siemens
C(rap) F(one 62 T(rash), I am hopeful but with tempered expectations that this Motorola v.188 can do better from a reception point of view compared to the P.O.C I already have. I am glad and grateful for the 14 day trial period and if this doesn't work then I am returning it. Anyone who has this phone currently, please provide feedback, one way or the other (i.e., just how is this phone?)
...
🙄 Anyone else and everyone else please provide opinions on the discussion at hand.
Thanks!
Thanks!
...
One difference that seems minor but really important to some is the screen. The V188 has a low res 56k color display. If you use your phone for more then just calls it can be very irritating. The V3 has one of the largest dispays on a more standard handset. The screen is so sharp it appears as though it is projected on to the lens itself. This ads to comfort and ease of use. The V188 is also a lower power handset. This means that it may be weaker when recieving service, speaker is lower, and may even operate slower to name a few. That is why the charging plugs are different. The V188 is what I like to call a "disposable phone" it will probably last a year if you are lucky. Cost was placed ahead of quality when it was created. The ...
(continues)
(continues)
...
😁 That's quite alright man! Like some people here, I don't going head-chewing over little stuff like this.
But nevertheless, good comparisons provided and good points overall. I think though that if you are getting what you call "a disposable phone" for free as an upgrade, then go for it right?
(P.S. - I'm upgrading from a Siemens CF62T, probably the KIA or Hyundai of the phone industry (i.e., real crappy.....and I paid $20 for this?!?!?)).
But nevertheless, good comparisons provided and good points overall. I think though that if you are getting what you call "a disposable phone" for free as an upgrade, then go for it right?
(P.S. - I'm upgrading from a Siemens CF62T, probably the KIA or Hyundai of the phone industry (i.e., real crappy.....and I paid $20 for this?!?!?)).
...
The less expensive or "disposable phones" seem to carry the quality issues like weak reception, weak call stability, and other quirkie issues. The V188 is by far the better choice on the low tier line up. The Siemens definitely is our worst nightmare as and is a bad reminder of the Motorola C332 phase. Once again low tier phones are rushed out to shelves with less testing. They can be a good buy if they suit your needs. I couldn't imaginge buying a 4x4 when you need a commuter car. Once piece of advice I try to share is make sure choose a phone that has been on our shelves for over four months. This allows the carrier and manufacture to respond to problems. The V180-->V188 is a perfect example. The V180 was on the same level of the ...
(continues)
(continues)
...
TMoto said:
The less expensive or "disposable phones" seem to carry the quality issues like weak reception, weak call stability, and other quirkie issues. The V188 is by far the better choice on the low tier line up. The Siemens definitely is our worst nightmare as and is a bad reminder of the Motorola C332 phase.
I was in CC when the C332 came out, and I kept TELLING my SR that there was a problem with it, before the alt exchange program, but he didn't believe me. And I was in tech when the CF62T came out, and whenever anyone mentioned that phone, you heard a LOT of groaning. Personally, I'm not a fan of Motos. But I am enjoying my new 6101.
...
The 6101 is truly a good handsets (So far) This handset is one of the first in a long time that I wasn't afraid of the first ones sold coming back. In fact I have not seen one come back since its launch. Nokia always seems to consistently produce solid preforming handsets. Even the handset that had issues (3650) Nokia responded. I too would probably have a Nokia myself if we had a simple candy bar style handset. I miss my 6610.
...
LilShorty said:TMoto said:
The less expensive or "disposable phones" seem to carry the quality issues like weak reception, weak call stability, and other quirkie issues. The V188 is by far the better choice on the low tier line up. The Siemens definitely is our worst nightmare as and is a bad reminder of the Motorola C332 phase.
I was in CC when the C332 came out, and I kept TELLING my SR that there was a problem with it, before the alt exchange program, but he didn't believe me. And I was in tech when the CF62T came out, and whenever anyone mentioned that phone, you heard a LOT of groaning. Personally, I'm not a fan of Motos. But I am enjoying my new 6101.
Updat...
(continues)
...
Having owned the v188 before, and now the RAZR, two things impressed me when I switched to the RAZR--one expected, the other not expected.
1) RAZR screen is much easier to deal with if you plan on using T-Mobile Web very much. That was expected.
2) The other thing I have really come to appreciate--rather unexpectedly--is the thinness (and lightness) of the RAZR. You can just drop it in your front pants pocket and forget it. You will hardly notice it is there. No belt clip to fool with, etc. A very PRACTICAL mobile phone in that sense...for a few dollars more.
1) RAZR screen is much easier to deal with if you plan on using T-Mobile Web very much. That was expected.
2) The other thing I have really come to appreciate--rather unexpectedly--is the thinness (and lightness) of the RAZR. You can just drop it in your front pants pocket and forget it. You will hardly notice it is there. No belt clip to fool with, etc. A very PRACTICAL mobile phone in that sense...for a few dollars more.
...
Hi,
I agree! I´ve just taken delivery of my RAZR V3 after extending my phone contract.
I would like to ask though...
Do you, (or anyone reading), know how I can transfer sounds from my PC, to the Ring-Tones list in my RAZR.
I have the software & Data-Cable etc. & have already transfered music to the `Sounds´, in the phone.
But when I go to change the Ring-Tone for incoming calls. The list of sounds has not taken the sound-data I transfered from my PC.
They are still in the Multimedia "Sounds", but I need them in "Settings/Ring-Tones"!
Anyone know how to help?
Otherwise I find the RAZR EXCELLENT!
And all who say otherwise, should take the time to `Discover´ the RAZR for what it is...
A dammn fine piece of mod...
(continues)
I agree! I´ve just taken delivery of my RAZR V3 after extending my phone contract.
I would like to ask though...
Do you, (or anyone reading), know how I can transfer sounds from my PC, to the Ring-Tones list in my RAZR.
I have the software & Data-Cable etc. & have already transfered music to the `Sounds´, in the phone.
But when I go to change the Ring-Tone for incoming calls. The list of sounds has not taken the sound-data I transfered from my PC.
They are still in the Multimedia "Sounds", but I need them in "Settings/Ring-Tones"!
Anyone know how to help?
Otherwise I find the RAZR EXCELLENT!
And all who say otherwise, should take the time to `Discover´ the RAZR for what it is...
A dammn fine piece of mod...
(continues)
...
I've used all of our current flip phones (I work in customer care) except for the Nokia 6101. I benchmarked them against my old Samsung V205 from 3 years ago (which still works great considering I paid $370 for it).
The only phone (including the V3 RAZR) that had even close the same reception was the V188. I see later down the line that you chose the V188...good choice!!!
The only phone (including the V3 RAZR) that had even close the same reception was the V188. I see later down the line that you chose the V188...good choice!!!
...
😁 Thanks for the vote of confidence in my selection....
So tell me one thing about your benchmark testing.....just where did the Siemens C(rap)
F(one) 62 T(rash) fall on the scaling in terms of comparing to your Samsung v205? And in your tests, did the RAZR fair better or worse than the v188 on that test?
So tell me one thing about your benchmark testing.....just where did the Siemens C(rap)
F(one) 62 T(rash) fall on the scaling in terms of comparing to your Samsung v205? And in your tests, did the RAZR fair better or worse than the v188 on that test?
...
