Roaming agreements
It might be better though considering T-Mobile will no longer have to pay for California and Nevada.
The delay to renegotiate was not t-mob's doing either... It only took them a couple days to request a renegotiation... Cingular delayed it till 2005 due to "merger issues"
speck said:
Only real criticism I have of our execs is that instead of selling the ATTWS California/Nevada spectrum to Tmob... They sell the Cingular portion... The portion we KNOW works... Makes no sense to me...
That wouldn't make any sense to me either, but you have to wonder what the reason is behind it. Did AWS have a better/bigger network in CA/NV than Cingular did? Do you know how much was overlapping?
Here's a question for you that I really wouldn't know how to answer myself and the company hasn't given us any feedback either. With MMS, we had an agreement with AWS that made transmissions compatible between the 2 networks inter-carrier. However, AWS is no longer, so will cingular pick that up ...
(continues)
As far as MMS... to be honest I've been dying to know the same thing but they haven't said anything on our end either... The only thing they've announced about inter-carrier MMS is our arrangement w/ VZW... Personally I think we should continue w/ Tmob... but with the recent business tactics Cingular has been displaying towards Tmob in particular... it looks doubtful... I hope i'm wrong though...
speck said:
It might be better though considering T-Mobile will no longer have to pay for California and Nevada.
Well, they won't have to pay into the joint venture any longer, but initially they're going to pay big time. cingular after all is not *giving* T-Mobile their infrastructure in California and Nevada. T-Mobile is buying that infrastructure.
I am waiting for that to happen as I know that will be a big advantage for us.
RGJ
I'm not following you...