Verizon and Sprint
what does sprint have to offer? nothing that we don't already have. we have a far superior network. if you really look at their coverage map, they practically live off of analog roaming. just my oppinion
-vzw429-
sprint has plenty of things that could interest investors.. highiest arpu, spectrum positions and great network with a lot of capacity, and subscribers.
verizon doesnt need sprint to dethrone cingular becuase if the numbers of subscriber growth per quarter stands currently, verizon will pass cingular for that top number 1 spot at the end of 2006.
knvinvest said:
Any chance these two will hook up in the future to dethrone Cingular???
Probably none bro, due to antitrust issues. 'sides, didn't Sprint already hook up wit' Nextel?
But Cingular's probably gonna get 'dethroned' anyway. Verizon's only 3 mil behind 'em in total customers, an' is beating Cing in customer adds at a pace of about 1 million per quarter.
So, a lotta people expect Verizon to pass Cingular in total customer count in the next year, re-takin' the #1 spot. Without any help from Sprint whatsoevah.
(continues)
"Verizon probably wouldn't want Sprint because of the Nextel network."
this isnt a sound statement. nextel actually has a very good network with a lot of spectrum especially in the 800, 1.9ghz and 2.5ghz bands. so to say that is a bad thing. plus they have the highiest metrics (the very important ones) in the industry.
"If Verizon were to acquire Sprint, they would sell off Nextel immediately. "
this wouldnt happen.. sprint and a verizon merger would never happen and it wouldnt pass the regulatory bodies without major divestitures.
actualy, vodafone could go after sprint. it would be a powerful domestic and international force.
(continues)
dave73 said:
And Vodaphone isn't interested in Sprint as they want a GSM network.
Wait, why would Voda phone want a gsm network?
Verizon is owned by Verizon Comunications AND Vodaphone (http://aboutus.vzw.com/aboutusoverview.html)
that would be like competing against themselves?
does that make any sense or am i just crazy?
VZW429 said:dave73 said:
And Vodaphone isn't interested in Sprint as they want a GSM network.
Wait, why would Voda phone want a gsm network?
Verizon is owned by Verizon Comunications AND Vodaphone (http://aboutus.vzw.com/aboutusoverview.html)
that would be like competing against themselves?
does that make any sense or am i just crazy?
Supposedly, Vodafone wants to expand ther international GSM network. Vodaphone's entire world network is GSM based except for in the US with their stake in Verizon. A GSM network in the US would be more beneficial to Vodafone as their international customers could use one phone on any Vodafone network in the world.
Vodafone ...
(continues)
RUFF1415 said:...VZW429 said:dave73 said:
And Vodaphone isn't interested in Sprint as they want a GSM network.
Wait, why would Voda phone want a gsm network?
Verizon is owned by Verizon Comunications AND Vodaphone (http://aboutus.vzw.com/aboutusoverview.html)
that would be like competing against themselves?
does that make any sense or am i just crazy?
Supposedly, Vodafone wants to expand their international GSM network. Vodaphone's entire world network is GSM based except for in the US with their stake in Verizon. A GSM network in the US would be more beneficial to Vodafone as their international customers could use one phone on any Vodafon
(continues)
dave73 said:...RUFF1415 said:VZW429 said:dave73 said:
And Vodaphone isn't interested in Sprint as they want a GSM network.
Wait, why would Voda phone want a gsm network?
Verizon is owned by Verizon Comunications AND Vodaphone (http://aboutus.vzw.com/aboutusoverview.html)
that would be like competing against themselves?
does that make any sense or am i just crazy?
Supposedly, Vodafone wants to expand their international GSM network. Vodaphone's entire world network is GSM based except for in the US with their stake in Verizon. A GSM network in the US would be more beneficial to Vodafone as their international customers c
(continues)
texaswireless said:
That is not what he meant. Reread it a few times and you will see your mistake.
Ah....I didn't read it that way the first time. I thought he was stating that CDMA is a dead technology. My apologies.
Other fools would start a new thread within a thread arguing how CDMA was so awesome and GSM sucks yada yada yada...
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays.
SForsyth01 said:...dave73 said:RUFF1415 said:VZW429 said:dave73 said:
And Vodaphone isn't interested in Sprint as they want a GSM network.
Wait, why would Voda phone want a gsm network?
Verizon is owned by Verizon Comunications AND Vodaphone (http://aboutus.vzw.com/aboutusoverview.html)
that would be like competing against themselves?
does that make any sense or am i just crazy?
Supposedly, Vodafone wants to expand their international GSM network. Vodaphone's entire world network is GSM based except for in the US with their stake in Verizon. A GSM network in the US would be more beneficial to Vodafo
(continues)
RUFF1415 said:...SForsyth01 said:dave73 said:RUFF1415 said:VZW429 said:dave73 said:
And Vodaphone isn't interested in Sprint as they want a GSM network.
Wait, why would Voda phone want a gsm network?
Verizon is owned by Verizon Comunications AND Vodaphone (http://aboutus.vzw.com/aboutusoverview.html)
that would be like competing against themselves?
does that make any sense or am i just crazy?
Supposedly, Vodafone wants to expand their international GSM network. Vodaphone's entire world network is GSM based except for in the US with their stake in Verizon. A GSM network in the US
(continues)
one word: Customers.
Yes, it may not be as many customers, but its customers. Just like when Cingular took on ATT, they got enough customers to dethrown Verizon. If Verizon swallowed up Sprint, they would be the king again.
In addition, they would be gobbling up Nextel cutomers and it walkie talkie following.
And with Sprint's phones working on the CDMA network, all the hardware will be compatible. Thats the beauty of it.
eric815 said:Cingular did not buy AT&T wireless for their customers. Cingular bought AT&T Wireless because it saw the opportunity as a quick fix to their 3G spectrum problem.
They do have something that Verizon would want...
one word: Customers.
Yes, it may not be as many customers, but its customers. Just like when Cingular took on ATT, they got enough customers to dethrown Verizon. If Verizon swallowed up Sprint, they would be the king again.
In addition, they would be gobbling up Nextel cutomers and it walkie talkie following.
And with Sprint's phones working on the CDMA network, all the hardware will be compatible. Thats the beauty of it.
Prior to the purchase, Cingular would not have had ...
(continues)
I could see Verizon trying to buy out alltel.
One Company I would like to see either Sprint or Verizon buy is US Cellular. Anyone see this happening anytime soon?
eric815 said:
They do have something that Verizon would want...
one word: Customers.
Yes, it may not be as many customers, but its customers. Just like when Cingular took on ATT, they got enough customers to dethrown Verizon. If Verizon swallowed up Sprint, they would be the king again.
Yeah, but Verizon looks like it'll take back #1 from Cingular on its own within the next year, even wit'out a merger. They are jus' adding customers like crazy.. Cing ain't.
Plus, I can't see how the Feds would ok a merger like that. 'specially seein' as how Sprint has already merged wit' Nextel. So Verizon-Sprint-Nextel? A near-100 million customer US carrier? About 50% of the entire US market in the hands o' ONE car...
(continues)
RUFF1415 said:
Comcast is the only cable company available in my area. Still not considered a monopoly.
And what has that done fo' your cable prices? 😳
Out here we got a couple of dish services, but Comcast is the only cable company. We got word not long ago that expanded basic cable is gonna go to $50/month in January. And that's w/no premium NOTHING.. no HBO, no Skinemax, no digital cable, no chit.
Sorry, but fo' 'not a monopoly' they sure do act an' price like one.
RUFF1415 said:
Comcast is the only cable company available in my area. Still not considered a monopoly.
Not true, Ruff. We have Adelphia in Pittsburgh as well. And we also have Satellite options as well.
SForsyth01 said:RUFF1415 said:
Comcast is the only cable company available in my area. Still not considered a monopoly.
Not true, Ruff. We have Adelphia in Pittsburgh as well. And we also have Satellite options as well.
I don't live inside the city. I live in Greensburg. Adelphia is not available here. Therefore, there is one and only one cable option for us Greensburgers.
RUFF1415 said:SForsyth01 said:RUFF1415 said:
Comcast is the only cable company available in my area. Still not considered a monopoly.
Not true, Ruff. We have Adelphia in Pittsburgh as well. And we also have Satellite options as well.
I don't live inside the city. I live in Greensburg. Adelphia is not available here. Therefore, there is one and only one cable option for us Greensburgers.
It's not as if it acts like true competition. Comcast is available in some areas and adelphia in others. In no area do you have a choice unless you want satellite. I was just stating that both do exist in the area.
'cus = because
wit'out = without
'specially = especially
seein' = seeing
wit = with
ta = to
an' = and
lotta = lot of
fo' = for
o' = of
c'mon = come on
These are from only one message. English isn't that difficult, and the number of keystrokes is almost the same (54 versus 61).
f38urry said:
jus' = just
'cus = because
etc
etc
These are from only one message. English isn't that difficult, and the number of keystrokes is almost the same (54 versus 61).
Not clicking on posts you don't like = Easy. Duh.
This is from only one msg. Common sense isn't that difficult, but if you need mo' tips on avoiding reading posts that bother you, ask fo' help an' I will assist you further. Out.
I 100% agree with you!
xIsamuTM said:
why people gotta be hatin' on System? Let da man type however he pleases! So speaketh me, "Let he who speaks proper english all the time cast the first stone."
Thanks, X. 🙂
"Date Posted: Dec 14, 2004, 11:37 AM
Source: Wall Street Journal / AP via Forbes
The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Vodafone has given Verizon Wireless the green-light to make a bid to buy Sprint. Vodafone owns 45% of Verizon Wireless. Such a bid could disrupt final negotiations for a merger between Sprint and Nextel, a deal that is tentatively scheduled to be announced tomorrow in New York. Verizon Communications has been studying a potential Sprint takeover for 18 months, but even with the nod from Vodafone, it is not clear if Verizon will go ahead with the bid. A successful acquisition of Sprint would return Verizon Wireless to the #1 spot, with 65 million...
(continues)
In fact, wouldn't mind if there were more nationals. If it didn' hurt vzw's roaming agreements any, I'd think it'd be cool if Alltel an' US Cellular merged, an' became a national, or somethin' close to it.
Choices, choices, I likes me some choices.
SystemShock said:
Hope it never happens. I think havin' only three national carriers wouldn't be so great fo' competition, or the consumer.
In fact, wouldn't mind if there were more nationals. If it didn' hurt vzw's roaming agreements any, I'd think it'd be cool if Alltel an' US Cellular merged, an' became a national, or somethin' close to it.
Choices, choices, I likes me some choices.
I could see Alltel & US Cellular merging, but when it'll happen is unknown. Both have midwest coverage, but Alltel has focused on the Western part of the country outside of the Midwest while US Cellular has focused on the NE outside of the Midwest. If both services merge, divestment will take place in Wisconsi...
(continues)
It will never happen now that the Sprint/Nextel merger has happened.
yeahright said:
no need to. If Verizon keeps it up, their customer service and superior network will pull in enough customers to gain the number one spot soon enough.
in addidtion to that Sprint and Nextel were in their talks of merging
(continues)