POLL: The 6256i... Would You Buy It If They Crippled The Bluetooth?
But still... no one knows for sure that Verizon will do the right thing. The 6256i could conceivably come out with the same old crappy crippled BT, which is the one thing I really don't like about VZW.
So my Poll Question: If VZW crippled the Bluetooth, would you by this phone? Yes or No?
BetterThanJake said:
I'm still waiting for the Nokia 6256i, and there are some indications (from things like manuals and call-out cards) that it will be the first Verizon phone released with uncrippled Bluetooth.
But still... no one knows for sure that Verizon will do the right thing. The 6256i could conceivably come out with the same old crappy crippled BT, which is the one thing I really don't like about VZW.
So my Poll Question: If VZW crippled the Bluetooth, would you by this phone? Yes or No?
Absolutely not. It is lacking EVDO. The only thing it really has going for it is that it is a Nokia and full bluetooth.
No Full Bluetooth = No Sale to me.
so that's one for YES
freedomrep said:
Actually the 6256i will not be the 1st uncrippled device the Samsung i730 has full OBEX. But, even if they do cripple it I still want that phone!!!!!!
Why does everyone want this phone so bad???? If BT is crippled, all it will be is a plain looking flip phone. No EVDO, Crippled BT.....etc....
I just don't get it.
freedomrep said:
b/c it's a nokia flip. Nokia's are notorious for there great reception and durability
Yes, on GSM and TDMA. I have never had a good Nokia phone on CDMA. Every one I have ever had on CDMA dropped calls horribly and weren't worth their weight in garbage.
Plus, this phone looks exactly like the problematic T720. I had nothing but issues with that phone, so anything that looks remotely like it just brings back haunting memories.
SForsyth01 said:freedomrep said:
b/c it's a nokia flip. Nokia's are notorious for there great reception and durability
Yes, on GSM and TDMA. I have never had a good Nokia phone on CDMA. Every one I have ever had on CDMA dropped calls horribly and weren't worth their weight in garbage.
Plus, this phone looks exactly like the problematic T720. I had nothing but issues with that phone, so anything that looks remotely like it just brings back haunting memories.
I guess you never tried the Nokia 3589i, that thing was a rock solid performer
gunny said:SForsyth01 said:freedomrep said:
b/c it's a nokia flip. Nokia's are notorious for there great reception and durability
Yes, on GSM and TDMA. I have never had a good Nokia phone on CDMA. Every one I have ever had on CDMA dropped calls horribly and weren't worth their weight in garbage.
Plus, this phone looks exactly like the problematic T720. I had nothing but issues with that phone, so anything that looks remotely like it just brings back haunting memories.
I guess you never tried the Nokia 3589i, that thing was a rock solid performer
Actually, the 3589i is what I was given by my company in my prior job. That is m...
(continues)
Also, I know its a bar phone, but didn't the Nokia 3589 have very good CDMA reception? That phone's name always seems to come up in discussions of 'legendary reception' Verizon phones.
BetterThanJake said:
Also, I know its a bar phone, but didn't the Nokia 3589 have very good CDMA reception? That phone's name always seems to come up in discussions of 'legendary reception' Verizon phones.
That is what everyone is telling me, but the one I had in my prior job (my company gave me a 3589i) dropped an insane amount of calls. I really hated that phone for call quality and reception.
BetterThanJake said:
Odd. Is it possible you got a bad one? I mean, the 3589's good reception rep had to come from somewhere, I'd imagine?
Very possible, because my company would do nothing to get me a replacement. So, I couldn't give an educated assessment of it.
But I also base my opinion on a VZW rep telling me (back when it was bell atlantic mobile in my area) that Nokia insists on using their own chipsets instead of qualcomm chipsets which causes them to underperform on CDMA networks. But I don't know how true that is either. Just the basis of my opinion.
bpar said:
Yes.
Thank you for youβre participation, you will be notified of the results. π
Here's hoping Verizon listens to their customers and doesn't cripple the Bluetooth capabilities. What's the point? Isn't that the main reason why most of us want this phone?