Home  ›  Carriers  ›

Verizon

Info & Phones News Forum  

all discussions

show all 70 replies

Warning to Potential New Verizon Customers

circuslove

Apr 28, 2004, 1:47 PM
Verizon SUCKS at releasing new phones. Expect them to be the last one on the block with any new phone technology and always expect to be dissapointed by bogus release dates that will continually be pushed back MONTHS and MONTHS due to Verizon's "extensive testing" program.

If you like what they currently have and are content to keep that handset for a LONG time, then disregard this message and enjoy Verizon's "superior service."
...
doomtroll

Apr 28, 2004, 2:36 PM
those long testing times are to make sure the phones you get are free of a large amount of problems.

if you don't want to wait for a phone that has at least half of its problems fixed before it comes out then maybe another carrier is where you belong.
...
doomtroll

Apr 28, 2004, 2:39 PM
and another note..."phonescoop.com" has TENTATIVE realease dates that do not reflect what VZW QA is doing...if you want the real information you will have to wait untill VZW says they will release it.
...
Biggs

Apr 28, 2004, 6:50 PM
Bravo. Well said here. šŸ™‚
...
circuslove

Apr 28, 2004, 8:28 PM
You are deluding yourself if you think that verizon releases its phones in a timely manner. All you need to do is check the forums on this very site to see countless examples. And I am referring to both the phone sccop dates AND the many verizon reps, both informed and clueless when I speak of delays, inaccuracies and just BS. In particular, is the "extensive testing" and "best coverage" mantra that the employees, and the employees pretending not to be employees on this board seem to drone on and on about instead of actually taking the time to utilize some brain cells and think for themselves. Trust me, that testing line, is all good and well, but after the release is delayed over 2 months, you wont care, you will start to wonder why th...
(continues)
...
muchdrama

Apr 28, 2004, 11:28 PM
circuslove said:
You are deluding yourself if you think that verizon releases its phones in a timely manner. All you need to do is check the forums on this very site to see countless examples. And I am referring to both the phone sccop dates AND the many verizon reps, both informed and clueless when I speak of delays, inaccuracies and just BS. In particular, is the "extensive testing" and "best coverage" mantra that the employees, and the employees pretending not to be employees on this board seem to drone on and on about instead of actually taking the time to utilize some brain cells and think for themselves. Trust me, that testing line, is all good and well, but after the release is delayed over 2 months, you wont
...
(continues)
...
Biggs

Apr 29, 2004, 12:08 AM
You seem pretty upset. Are you certain you're not as FORMER employee of VzW perhaps. I am certain that there are reps on these posts, but I'm sure if you asked them, they would certainly tell you that they do work for VzW.
Maybe I'm just playing "Devil's šŸ˜ˆ Advocate" here, but some kindness wouldn't hurt, and I do mean going both ways here.
...
circuslove

Apr 29, 2004, 5:35 AM
Actually, I happen to be one of many potential customers of Verizon. This message is only meant to provoke an intelligent discourse (oh well, I guess that was unlikely with so many Verizon sales people trying to protect their cashflow in this forum) regarding some areas where Verizon is definitely lacking in my, as well as many others', opinion. Hopefully, Verizon will take a break from repeating over and over again about their service, which, to be honest, really does not seem to be above and beyond every other provider, and maybe listen to people on this forum and do something about some areas where they are deficient. I have many friends in the telecom industry as well as many friends with different providers and it doesnt take a geniu...
(continues)
...
pastyirishman

Apr 29, 2004, 8:22 AM
I know that the whole point of these forums is for open discussion, but I for one am tired of reading the back and forth between the "shut up and enjoy the best network" people, and the "Where the hell are the phones" people - even though I can identify with their frustration.
I don't work in the telecom industry, or anything related to it, but the reason I originally started watching these forums was because of my own frustration with VZW's phone selection, and to this day I still don't understand why they feel they can charge the prices they do for phones that were new a year ago...But this is a case where both sides of this argument are partially right.
Yes, it's true that Verizon's network is fantastic - I've used it all over the...
(continues)
...
circuslove

Apr 29, 2004, 8:41 AM
I agree completely. I have noticed something interesting that perhaps someone can shed some light on. Based on the FCC approval dates, it really doesnt seem like Verizon tests their phones any longer than any one else. The problem seems to be that verizon waits about 4-6 months after the other carriers to even develop/introduce the phones in the first place. I suspect it is a cost saving measure for them and the testing line is part of a "smoke and mirrors" game or perhaps it is because of verizon's slack policy of releasing phones and the other carriers have won contracts with manufacturers such as Samsung, Moto, etc giving them priority over verizon ("first dibs") to developing new phones.
...
tmp

Apr 29, 2004, 11:33 AM
Well, said- I'm in the same boat. I switched to Verizon about 4 years ago with the purchase of a V8160 from Cingular because of the spotty coverage of what was then Pacific Bell Wireless. I'm loathe to switch carriers, and I really want another Motorola (V710, to be specific), but pushing back the release date further and further makes me either the phone is crap or Verizon is jerking us around. I have been off contract for nearly two years now and there isn't a phone yet out that grabs my attention the way that, say, the V600 does. The only hesitation that I have is AT&T's coverage. But if Verizon doesn't get off the pot....
...
circuslove

Apr 29, 2004, 11:54 AM
I think that we agree with those that are in poor service areas, have no choice but to take Verizon, or who dont care for newer hardware, that verizon is a fine and dandy choice and we are happy that you are happy. I dont think that the argument lies there. We are not you, however, and we have other needs that are not addressed and we feel that we deserve to have our needs met as well and then we would be (or could be) happy go lucky paying verizon customers as well.
...
phonepimp3376

May 2, 2004, 9:44 AM
Let's not forget one MAJOR reason for delays in new phones... vendors are developing far more GSM phones than CDMA because GSM phones can be sold in more areas than CDMA. This leads to a delay in new CDMA equipment, because they go where the fast money is, and that is GSM.
...
blaatand

May 2, 2004, 5:28 PM
I don't know about that. There are plenty of CDMA customers around the world. One thing that may be a factor is that GSM (tri-band ones anyway) can be unlocked and used anywhere, (so a GSM customer here can use the greatest phones coming out of Europe) but it's more difficult to setup, say a Korean CDMA phone to work on CDMA networks here.

But as far as carriers go, I'd say Sprint has the best phones by far. They've got several video phones, whereas TMobile has one (the 6600 that they're selling for like $400) and I don't think Cingular or AT&T do.

Everybody complains about Verizon phones, and I used to upgrade to the latest and greatest phones every few months when on TMobile, but I'm honestly hard-pressed to find anything any other c...
(continues)
...
mk

Apr 29, 2004, 12:00 PM
Very well said. Anyone with any knowledge of this industry will admit that Verizon has the best coverage, but the worst phones. Anyone who disputes that either a) knows nothing about the cellular industry, b) works for one of the carriers and will defend it to the death, c) is just plain ignorant or b )a troll looking to stir the pot.

There are a few "d's" here.
...
doomtroll

Apr 29, 2004, 12:07 PM
I have not DEFENDED our lack of SUPER AWESOME phones....I just think its a little drastic to buy the latest and greatest gizmo over a good carrier....it just makes no sence...I may be Biased...but I know I'm not full of it
...
circuslove

Apr 29, 2004, 12:46 PM
doomtroll said:
I have not DEFENDED our lack of SUPER AWESOME phones....I just think its a little drastic to buy the latest and greatest gizmo over a good carrier....it just makes no sence...I may be Biased...but I know I'm not full of it


After all this time, if you have not gotten the point, I think you may be mentally incapable of getting it. I dont think it can be broken down any more for you. #1 service with #50 phones, compare to #2 service and #2 phones. I'll take the latter. I live in a metro area, can pick and choose my carriers because they all provide average to above average coverage and the only area where there is any major descrepency is hardware between carriers. I am not alone in this ...
(continues)
...
doomtroll

Apr 29, 2004, 12:56 PM
I'm not GOING to tell you about what my company has to offer you....its not what you want in cellular service...

I just don't understand you people who think just because you haed a little bad luck service wise ...or complain about new phones that you have to bash that company to no ebd

NO CARRIER IS PERFECT!!!

....if we can't please you....then go somewhere else...

its called the power of choice..
...
circuslove

Apr 29, 2004, 1:02 PM
THANK YOU, finally a decent answer. NO CARRIER IS PERFECT. Now was that so hard? Very few VZW peeps are willing to have an open mind such as you have just demonstrated. Now, you are in a much better position to understand other peoples' perspectives and frustrations. The point of these threads is to get Verizon to be in the same enlightened place as yourself. And I wish them the best to that end.
...
pastyirishman

Apr 29, 2004, 2:21 PM
doomtroll said:
I'm not GOING to tell you about what my company has to offer you....its not what you want in cellular service...

I just don't understand you people who think just because you haed a little bad luck service wise ...or complain about new phones that you have to bash that company to no ebd

NO CARRIER IS PERFECT!!!

....if we can't please you....then go somewhere else...

its called the power of choice..


I think most of the criticism of VZW is based on frustration BECAUSE they are the best carrier. It is hard for people (myself included) to comprehend why a company as strong as VZW would not put more importance on something that could seemingly put them over the top as the clear winne...
(continues)
...
MW2

May 1, 2004, 7:10 PM
mk said:
Very well said. Anyone with any knowledge of this industry will admit that Verizon has the best coverage, but the worst phones. Anyone who disputes that either a) knows nothing about the cellular industry, b) works for one of the carriers and will defend it to the death, c) is just plain ignorant or b )a troll looking to stir the pot.

There are a few "d's" here.

ACTUALLY i've disliked vzw before i ever worked for one of their competitors and still won't even after. they may have a great overall coverage but there are still plenty of areas in the country where their service area is absolute @sscrap and has been for a long time and they still haven't fixed them.

all 3 of the major gsm carrie...
(continues)
...
mk

May 3, 2004, 7:07 AM
Verizon isn't perfect everywhere - no carrier is. You obviously live in a section of the country that is covered better by other carriers. However, my point is valid - Verizon has the best coverage nationwide. Nobody can argue that.
...
circuslove

May 3, 2004, 8:28 AM
My initial comment had nothing to do with coverage and giving yet another venue for verizon salespeople to repeat "we are number one in coverage" a million times was not my intent either. I will take number 2 in coverage and number 2 in phones any day over number one in coverage and number 10 in phones with a support staff that seems to have lost the ability to listen to its customers' and potential customers' concerns and simply repeats over and over again, "we are number one in coverage." I recommend people who are thinking about verizon to investigate the howard forums as well. There are many logical arguments there as also. You will have to wade through verizon salespeople skewing the arguments with "we are number one in coverage" th...
(continues)
...
graphikzking

May 3, 2004, 3:25 PM
I agree We do need better and nicer phones! Remember you actually have a choice of what phone to purchase! You can go to the other companies and get the latest greatest things.. but we (in order to get a discount have to use whatever Verizon sells).

The coverage thing.. been with almost all the carriers over the years and still think that ATT TDMA was some of the best coverage.. but now with GSM they have lost alot of coverage I think. Verizon is definately now the best coverage. You don't have to listen to our adds, read the stuff that we can't use in our ads:

Consumer Reports #1 in all 12 markets tested (2 years in a row). Also, our churn(customers lost with local number portability) would be much higher if our service and coverage ...
(continues)
...
circuslove

May 3, 2004, 4:47 PM
point well taken, Ive read that article too. They truly must have gotten something right and I totally agree that in most places they are number one in coverage and signal quality. I just wish they would catch up regarding the selection. They really are in last place in that respect, and that is definitely not something to be proud of. I can only assume that eventually, everyone will catch up coverage wise (I mean, you can only have so many towers, etc) and then when the playing field has been leveled, verizon will be stuck with the worst hardware, last with good megapixel phones, bluetooth, true 3G, etc and they will go from first to last place. I would hate for that to happen to them. But by the responses by representatives from then...
(continues)
...
blaatand

May 3, 2004, 5:58 PM
Well, it certainly seems Verizon will have some good new phones coming out (eventually). But even for myself, somewhat of a new phone addict, I think this whole "Verizon doesn't have any new phones thing" is a bit overblown. While it may be "old", CNET and others still label the VX6000 the best camera phone out there, and being an owner, I'd have to agree. Verizon's got 3 camera phones. Other than Sprint, who's got more? What other to-die-for features do other carriers' phones offer, other than Bluetooth with the V600? And, having been THE Bluetooth guy at a large electronics company, it is the most overblown technology ever.
I agree...if others catch up to Verizon's coverage, and Verizon doesn't bring out newer phones, we'll just switch. I...
(continues)
...
tmp

May 3, 2004, 6:34 PM
blaatand said:
Randomly look at 100 people the next time you're in the mall/subway/airport/whatever and rate the sophistication of the phones they're carrying. Chances are, half of them will still be blank&white, and probably only a fraction will have an advanced feature like a camera,etc.


I could be snotty and say that's 'cause they're on Verizon. šŸ˜‰
...
schnozejt

May 9, 2004, 11:56 AM
I'm looking to buy a car, i think i'll only look at the sheetmetal. all other components of what makes my new car doesn't matter. stop your damn whining its not going to get the phones out faster
...
muchdrama

Apr 28, 2004, 11:26 PM
circuslove said:
Verizon SUCKS at releasing new phones. Expect them to be the last one on the block with any new phone technology and always expect to be dissapointed by bogus release dates that will continually be pushed back MONTHS and MONTHS due to Verizon's "extensive testing" program.

If you like what they currently have and are content to keep that handset for a LONG time, then disregard this message and enjoy Verizon's "superior service."

And we'll do just that...enjoy our superior service. You see, there are nearly 40 million customers who just don't give a rat's caboose about waiting for a new phone. We're just pleased to be able to complete calls. Nyah!
...
moobak

Apr 28, 2004, 11:37 PM
You make it sound like every other of then roughly 20 providers in the U.S can't complete their calls, yet offer KICK ASS handsets in decent time periods?


Don't get yourself too riled up there, the real reason VZW does 'extensive testing' is so they can stick it to the customer whenever they have any problems, by INSISTING it is fully compatable with their network, and oh btw better pay extra per month for insurance or your SOL. šŸ˜›
At least they're covering their arses.
I agree on parts of these guys statements, I'd rather have a phone thats been out on the market for some time that WORKS GREAT, instead of one that has a billion and one features, yet works like nowhere.
This does NOT mean I think other providers do this, since its ju...
(continues)
...
mjh

Apr 29, 2004, 9:25 AM
OK all you VZW reps out there... I have the answer, let's see if you do... How many of you have actually seen phones being tested in the real world... Ha... None... How many VZW employee's were given phones to preview and test... None.... How many customers have been contacted to say hey... Do you want to preview and test a phone... None... VZW does do extensive testing of phones... In the back of trucks with the phones connected to computers.. Not in the real world... Which is why the phones are recalled a month after release... Technically the phones are great upon release... Technically the phones are superior to the competition... Or a computer would think so... But without real world testing, they are guarenteed to fail... What really i...
(continues)
...
doomtroll

Apr 29, 2004, 10:13 AM
I am guessing that you are pisssed that EVERY electronic manufacturer or distributer doesn't do real world testing to....that is something that goes beyond just sell phones.
...
circuslove

Apr 29, 2004, 11:48 AM
...and that is your response?

...um, good one.

Well, we should actually be happy I suppose. I mean, you didnt reply with "but we have the best service" so you are expanding your vocabulary at least.
...
muchdrama

Apr 29, 2004, 3:52 PM
circuslove said:
...and that is your response?

...um, good one.

Well, we should actually be happy I suppose. I mean, you didnt reply with "but we have the best service" so you are expanding your vocabulary at least.

Don't get all jealous, now...it's not gentlemanly.
...
MW2

May 1, 2004, 7:34 PM
Don't get all jealous, now...it's not gentlemanly.


jealously is not the new black this spring!
don't wear it!
: P
...
mk

Apr 29, 2004, 11:56 AM
You clearly are a troll. Nobody can be that biased.
...
doomtroll

Apr 29, 2004, 12:04 PM
oh but I am
...
mk

Apr 29, 2004, 12:08 PM
As your name clearly implies.
...
doomtroll

Apr 29, 2004, 12:49 PM
you can take from it what you want....



but attacking me personally makes me wonder if you are the real troll here
...
circuslove

Apr 29, 2004, 12:55 PM
My apologies. Those comments were more out of frustration than an intent to offend.


šŸ˜
...
doomtroll

Apr 29, 2004, 12:58 PM
maybe an "edit" option should be added to this forum then
...
muchdrama

Apr 29, 2004, 3:53 PM
doomtroll said:
maybe an "edit" option should be added to this forum then

I second that! Hear hear!
...
muchdrama

Apr 29, 2004, 3:50 PM
mjh said:

I have said it before... VZW is on a dangerious path... Once a huge corporation thinks of itself, and forgets the customer, it is only a matter of time before they get kicked in the ass...

And I'll say it again...what the hell path are you talking about? VZW is adding customers like white on rice...look at the numbers, they don't lie.
...
WynneFox

May 5, 2004, 12:27 AM
Iā€™m going to start by saying my point then get to the explanation because this had me thinking. My point: Nerdy folks who want fancy stuff are upset that Verizon Wireless caters to the greater general public rather then their specific needs. Now my explanation of that statement.

First to state that in the call center I work in, there are a couple of real life test people that are stationed here for testing phones through out this market. I have seen in their vehicles wired up many of the phones you guys are hot over such as the LG 7000 and such. Our department Director was parading around with a Samsung a610 months before it came out. Two to three times a year we have vender shows that come into the center, set up tables and show us in pe...
(continues)
...
abcdefg

May 5, 2004, 9:50 AM
Finally, a good post that makes sense to us normal people that do not want our phones to cook our dinners for us or start up our vehicle (s) for us while we are laying back in our lazy boy chair, watching TV.

In my opinion, yes, Verizon is the last one to come out with rate plans, and phones, but I would much rather have a phone that works everywhere I go, then just in a couple places. But also at the same time, where I am at, Verizon is the best network around. Cingular, AT&T, Nextel, and Sprint PCS does not even provide coverage. So there, Verizon has something that no other carrier does....coverage!
...
circuslove

May 5, 2004, 11:48 AM
abcdefg said:
Finally, a good post that makes sense to us normal people that do not want our phones to cook our dinners for us or start up our vehicle (s) for us while we are laying back in our lazy boy chair, watching TV.

In my opinion, yes, Verizon is the last one to come out with rate plans, and phones, but I would much rather have a phone that works everywhere I go, then just in a couple places. But also at the same time, where I am at, Verizon is the best network around. Cingular, AT&T, Nextel, and Sprint PCS does not even provide coverage. So there, Verizon has something that no other carrier does....coverage!


And we are very happy for you. really. But just like we don't expect everyone to be...
(continues)
...
pastyirishman

May 5, 2004, 1:36 PM
abcdefg said:
Finally, a good post that makes sense to us normal people that do not want our phones to cook our dinners for us or start up our vehicle (s) for us while we are laying back in our lazy boy chair, watching TV.

In my opinion, yes, Verizon is the last one to come out with rate plans, and phones, but I would much rather have a phone that works everywhere I go, then just in a couple places. But also at the same time, where I am at, Verizon is the best network around. Cingular, AT&T, Nextel, and Sprint PCS does not even provide coverage. So there, Verizon has something that no other carrier does....coverage!


I don't think that a single person has disputed the fact that VZW's coverage is #1. ...
(continues)
...
wells4cy

May 6, 2004, 11:23 PM
I think you need to realize that people use their phones to make PHONE CALLS. I think people that have to have these meaningless features are immature and just want to show off. Why does there have to be such fancy phones to do this? All these useless gadgets just give people more of a reason to fiddle with their phones while driving. Verizon has some of the neatest phones anyway. What do other carriers have that Verizon doesn't? Bottom line is Verizon has a limited number of phones to offer so they can give people the most help with specific phones unlike other carriers that have hundreds of phones and don't know anything about them.
...
pastyirishman

May 7, 2004, 6:28 AM
wells4cy said:Verizon has some of the neatest phones anyway. What do other carriers have that Verizon doesn't?


For the 1000th time, I AGREE!! Phone function is absolutely the #1 most important feature. But if you've got that, then why can't you ask for more features?
And my problem with VZW is not the phones themselves - my problem is that by the time we finally have a chance to buy them, they are outdated, and then charged as if they were brand new. Look at a phone like the Toshiba 4050 for Sprint. A decent camera/ video phone with a great screen, that has been out for a few months now. It's the same as the Audiovox 9900 that VZW is still "testing." When they finally release it, it will be perceived as ...
(continues)
...
mjh

May 7, 2004, 10:29 AM
OK.... Now I feel a need to reply....

"Verizon has a limited number of phones to offer so they can give people the most help with specific phones unlike other carriers that have hundreds of phones and don't know anything about them"

Call customer service with a question about a phone... I have had numerous issues with numerous phones... And... Very little help... It was almost like they were flipping cue cards to try and help me... Defidently didn't know much about the phones... It took 3 emails and 2 phone calls to get on the mobile web from my T730... All 5 contacts were unable to help... Found the answer on a message board...

All you corporate loosers think of Verizon as the High and Mighty... I use it because it works in the fe...
(continues)
...
tallrussian

Apr 29, 2004, 2:56 PM
šŸ˜‰ Extremely well said! I've been a Verizon customer for 7 years and I can relate to everything you said. Yes, be prepared to stick with a phone you got for 3-4 years before Verizon releases something new worth taking a look at. I've only changed my phone twice in my 7 years with Verizon just because Verizon did not release anything new that would be of any interest to me. Now I'm keeping an eye for Bluetooth. If, after 2 years of muffing, mumbling, munching and mulling, Verizon finaly gives birth to something (hopefully within a year or so), then that may be my next phone. Okay, so that will make it 3 phones in 8 years for me then. šŸ™„

circuslove said:
Verizon SUCKS at releasing new phones. Expect them t
...
(continues)
...
Biggs

May 1, 2004, 1:56 AM
That seems all well and good that you are a huge fan of the phones and the types of technology. I have to wonder, however, that if you were truly that dissatisfied with the equipment that Verizon offers (or the lack thereof), then why do you choose to remain with that company for so long? LNP happened last November for many folx, the rest will get theirs on the 24th. Gotta ask, "What's the excuse?"
I only ask because your reasoning (or again, the lack thereof) confuses me.
...
SPCSVZWJeff

Apr 29, 2004, 5:46 PM
As a representative of both Sprint and Verizon I would have to agree, Verizon's phones lag behind Sprint. But that being said they still perform much better than ATTWS, TMo and the others, at least in the Northwest. To be noted is the lack of bad phones. (with the exception of the Motorola V120, Nokia 5185i and the Samsung A-310.) The GSM people can say what they want about the awesome phones they get but let's get real the vast majority of them get either free or almost free phones. When EVDO becomes a reality you will see some new hardware to make it work. In the meantime does it really matter how cool a phone is if the carrier has poor coverage or massive amounts of network noise? If I can't talk on my phone it merely becomes a cool paper...
(continues)
...
verizonguyinohio

Apr 29, 2004, 5:51 PM
šŸ˜ Verizon Wireless has one of the best networks here in Ohio as well as Indiana, Michigan.

I have been a previous employee and customer of Alltel, and here in Ohio they were very bad, and we did not care about the complaints that we got from our customers.

Now that I am selling Verizon, and I have been a customer of Verizon since 2002, I have been VERY pleased with Verizon. There is NO comparison between the quality of Network with Verizon Wireless and Alltel.
Alltel = most calls go to voicemail even in a digital area
Verizon - calls are delivered 99.5% of the time at least here in Ohio & Michigan & Indiana areas.
...
MW2

May 1, 2004, 7:42 PM
coverage is very much a regional thing. in my area all 3 of the gsm carriers stomp vzw in actual coverage. and as for sound quality unless the person i call knows i'm using my wireless phone they think i'm calling from my landline.
...
verizonccemp

Apr 30, 2004, 2:37 PM
I have been reading some of the varios remarks back and forth. I don't want to get in the middle of this but I did want to illustrate why phones seem to take forever to roll out. When a manufacturer brings a phone to VZW (or any provider), it's barely more than a blueprint or empty shell of a phone. The idea goes back and forth from provider and manufacturer add/removing/changing features etc. All along the way the phone is being tested for more than just placing calls (i.e. reliability, compatibility with all markets; {more on this later}); you seem to be thinking the phone is just handed to vzw, ready to go, and all that needs to be done is try a few calls and ship it.
...
pastyirishman

Apr 30, 2004, 3:24 PM
verizonccemp said:
I have been reading some of the varios remarks back and forth. I don't want to get in the middle of this but I did want to illustrate why phones seem to take forever to roll out. When a manufacturer brings a phone to VZW (or any provider), it's barely more than a blueprint or empty shell of a phone. The idea goes back and forth from provider and manufacturer add/removing/changing features etc. All along the way the phone is being tested for more than just placing calls (i.e. reliability, compatibility with all markets; {more on this later}); you seem to be thinking the phone is just handed to vzw, ready to go, and all that needs to be done is try a few calls and ship it.


Thanks for th...
(continues)
...
mjh

May 1, 2004, 7:32 PM
Actually, VZW's Bread and Butter will be the fee for service and cancellation fee's... Anybody remember Bank One??? Fee, Fee, Fee, Fee... Oooooppps... Customer rebellion.... Now VZW charge's for checking voicemail, not included in mobile to mobile minutes anymore... Change your contract, need to pay an activation fee... Soon, by 4Q, charge's to speak with customer service.... Anyone know Claire from Sprint PCS (pretty crappy service).... Well, could it be that Calvin is coming to Verizon in 4Q?????????
...
verizonccemp

Apr 30, 2004, 2:50 PM
...there are many areas in the country which are called an "extended network". People commonly confuse these areas with roaming or no coverage. Correct, these are not VZW owned but we make agreements with these other providers to "borrow" their cell sites. If another provider has coverage in a given area, and uses a frequency/technology similar to our own, we may not recieve FCC permission to put up service. So we do the next best thing. We also test our phones, and do support in many of these areas. So to answer the rant of many of you, myself included, VZW is not just sitting around making us wait for new phones because they are playing a cruel game. šŸ˜‰
...
wb

May 3, 2004, 4:35 PM
Got news, I work in Nevada. I have Verizon. Guess who doesn't have a tower near my work area.
...
waywith

May 4, 2004, 9:49 AM
Jeez, I must be some kind of old timer. I use my cell phone to TALK to other people, not to play games, laboriously send text messages, get info that is better gotten from TV, etc.

As such, my primary concern is COVERAGE AVAILABILITY, quality of coverage, and ease of use of the phone for VOICE CALLS.

The messages on this and other forums about "cool phones", "neat color screens," "awesome ringtones", etc., really make me laugh.

My guess is that the average cellphone user who is beyond puberty is more in my camp than that of the "cool features" crowd. If I'm right, the carriers are going to have one tough time marketing all these frills to the majority of users in the US.

Anyone agree with me, or does everyone here think t...
(continues)
...
blaatand

May 4, 2004, 11:21 AM
Oh, totally agree. And I'm a gadget guy. But you're right - the vast majority of people couldnm't give a darn about all these other features. I used to work in one of the most tech-heavy cities in the country, and most of my friends hadn't bought a new phone in years. Even for me - cool phones are great, but calling people back 5 times, or worse, not being able to call at all - gets old. When/If another carrier matches Verizon's coverage AND customer service (nothing I hate worse than waiting forever for customer service and then talking to an idiot who can't fix anything), AND has better phones, I think about switching. Until then, no way.
...
tmp

May 4, 2004, 11:40 AM
waywith said:

Anyone agree with me, or does everyone here think that making voice calls is some kind of retro activity that is only a minor part of owning the latest gimicky hardware (i.e., the SUV folks of cellphoneland)?


I agree with you. The only reason I want to get rid of my old phone (a V8160) is that I get slammed with roaming if I leave teh greater LA area. My last trip to NY doubled my phone bill, and I was very careful about minutes. I don't need a camera, but if the phone is going to come with one, I'd like it to be a useful one, unlike the VGA ones out now. I'd like to have a color screen just for readability, and I'd like it to be the same size as my current phone. Sadly, ...
(continues)
...
circuslove

May 4, 2004, 11:56 AM
Um, if you are a happy old timer who is content with your phone and service

what exactly brings you to phonescoop then??? Perhaps some curiousity about er, um, PHONES?

There is nothing wrong with admitting it, the new phones and what they can are cool. We wont think any less of you.
...
tmp

May 4, 2004, 1:44 PM
circuslove said:
Um, if you are a happy old timer who is content with your phone and service

what exactly brings you to phonescoop then??? Perhaps some curiousity about er, um, PHONES?



šŸ™„

Duh, I'm interested in new phones. I also read AutoWeek.com; that doesn't mean I'm going to run out and buy a new car.

What I said was that I am more interested in having a phone that works than a phone with a bunch of useless gadgets. VGA cameras are IMHO useless gadgets. When they get to 1 Megapixel and over, they are useful. When the phone synchs with iSync so I don't have to update my Palm, phone and address book separately, then it's not a useless gadget. When it delivers an internet experienc
...
(continues)
...
pastyirishman

May 4, 2004, 1:37 PM
waywith said:My guess is that the average cellphone user who is beyond puberty is more in my camp than that of the "cool features" crowd. If I'm right, the carriers are going to have one tough time marketing all these frills to the majority of users in the US.

Anyone agree with me, or does everyone here think that making voice calls is some kind of retro activity that is only a minor part of owning the latest gimicky hardware (i.e., the SUV folks of cellphoneland)?

Waywith (who owns a Honda Civic averaging 33 mpg)


No one here is going to argue with your main point, that coverage and completing calls are the most important things. But why is it wrong to expect the biggest and supposed best wireless ...
(continues)
...
wirehead

May 4, 2004, 1:57 PM
waywith said:
Jeez, I must be some kind of old timer. I use my cell phone to TALK to other people, not to play games, laboriously send text messages, get info that is better gotten from TV, etc.


See, the way I look at it, there's maybe one or two features besides talk that many gear-heads go for. So, out of games, text messages, cameras, etc. most folks will want one or two of them.

I tried WAP and found it to be quite dumb. The screen size is simply too small and 95% of the time I care about the info that would be nice (weather, traffic) I've got a PC handy to check it out with, which is even better than checking the TV.
...
muchdrama

May 4, 2004, 2:02 PM
waywith said:
Jeez, I must be some kind of old timer. I use my cell phone to TALK to other people, not to play games, laboriously send text messages, get info that is better gotten from TV, etc.

Most of the people on this forum are hard core phone dorks, Way. They feel the days of talking to one another via voice is boring.

As such, my primary concern is COVERAGE AVAILABILITY, quality of coverage, and ease of use of the phone for VOICE CALLS.

This stuff still matters to us of course...but we're always looking for cool new ways to get the most out of our latest gadget.

The messages on this and other forums about "cool phones", "neat color screens," "awesome ringtones", etc., really make me laugh.
...
(continues)
...
MW2

May 4, 2004, 2:49 PM
muchdrama said:
Anyone agree with me, or does everyone here think that making voice calls is some kind of retro activity that is only a minor part of owning the latest gimicky hardware (i.e., the SUV folks of cellphoneland)?

We're just early adopters...always looking for the next cool thing.


yeap. and i'd bet that the majority of posters here are in their 20's (or older) with some of us getting close to being in the 30's.
...
waywith

May 5, 2004, 6:36 AM
MW2 said:
muchdrama said:
Anyone agree with me, or does everyone here think that making voice calls is some kind of retro activity that is only a minor part of owning the latest gimicky hardware (i.e., the SUV folks of cellphoneland)?

We're just early adopters...always looking for the next cool thing.


yeap. and i'd bet that the majority of posters here are in their 20's (or older) with some of us getting close to being in the 30's.


I've enjoyed the responses to my original post. Guess I can't find fault with ogling and lusting after the latest cell phones -- I occasionally will look at the new phones myself, and once in a while I will drop by the car dealer's for the...
(continues)
...
muchdrama

May 5, 2004, 11:48 AM
waywith said:
MW2 said:
muchdrama said:
Anyone agree with me, or does everyone here think that making voice calls is some kind of retro activity that is only a minor part of owning the latest gimicky hardware (i.e., the SUV folks of cellphoneland)?

We're just early adopters...always looking for the next cool thing.


yeap. and i'd bet that the majority of posters here are in their 20's (or older) with some of us getting close to being in the 30's.


I've enjoyed the responses to my original post. Guess I can't find fault with ogling and lusting after the latest cell phones -- I occasionally will look at the new phones myself, and once in a while I wil
...
(continues)
...

You must log in to reply.

Please log in to report a message to the moderator.


all discussions

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Threads Follow @phonescoop on Mastodon Phone Scoop on Facebook Follow on Instagram

 

Playwire

All content Copyright 2001-2024 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.