Is Verizon going to present a THIN PHONE(i.e. the razor)
The RAZR casing is made entirely out of aluminum and chemically etched titanium, not plastic. Show me the last time you cracked a piece of aluminum or titanium and then you can call it a POS, weak phone.
What phone do you have? Because if you want plastic, that's what the v710 is made of. đ
Anodized Aluminium Case
The ultra-thin Moto Razr V3 has the distinctive metallic lustre of anodized aluminum.
http://direct.motorola.com/ENS/Web_Feature_Home.asp? ... »
Satisfied?
I love how two people today have already told me that they know more than me about the cell ular phone business, before they even know who I am and they assume that I'm just a consumer. Classic. đ
Uh, I just called up a store and asked them too and they said it was aluminum. BS, you didn't call anybody up. That's what your word means to me.
If you don't believe a sales rep that works for Cingular and you don't believe Moto's own website, then you need to sit down and finish what you've been smoking.
đ˛ ohhhhhhhhhhhh
I never answered you question because I was proving to Krampfer that the RAZR is and never was being made out of plastic.
đ Way to assume I was talking to you.
đ˛ OH, SLAM.
Who ever was complaining about any service? I sure wasn't. Are you sure that you are replying to the right people?
Kampfer422 said: what a dumb question. Yes they are looking into carrying that POS but would any sales rep really want it, NO. Just ask Cingular. That POS has caused them more problems than anything and everyone i knew from Cing that got it, returned it and went back to the "walking handcannons"! Also the Mot710 is the razor phone feature for feature, except different keypad, but with better reception, better reliability and less of hassle than the razor. The razor is a cheap POS and the entire casing is plastic which offers so much support for such a thin phone. Let carriers offer flashier phones, if you want "bling bling" get their stuff, but don't complain about your service.
I just realized that you are...
(continues)
cingularreppy said:
Ok after reading a couple posts from Kampfer422 i have some comments, with this motorola razr phone, it IS aluminum/titanium everyone one of them, i dont know what u had but you seem to be the only ones that got these appearant " plastic phone" i have see nthese motoronl phone and seen people drop it on concrete and wont break.. sound like someone just a lil mad about something he doesnt need to be
I've dropped my V600 on concrete using a cheapy plastic face plate and it hasn't broken. That's proof of nothing. đ
Kampfer422 said:
actually i worked for CIngular the time they got it and the grey casing is not/was not titanium, it was plastic and thats what all the managers who got them that worked for me had and they returned them. I think you are thinking of the keypad which is made of titanium i believe since it is electro luminiscent. But you really don't know too much cause its made of plastic there buddy. So yeah i do know what i'm talking about and more than you since i've worked with cingular and tested out most of their current phones and now work for VZW and know more that you really care to know. And if you have a razor and like it your one of the few
You really have NO idea what you are talking about. ...
(continues)
Thanks Lex. đ
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
Wait...who is stupid? đ
I feel a good laugh coming on too. đ¤Ŗ
Don't worry. Lack of research doesn't exist with me. đ
Directly from Webster's Dictionary:
Anodize- To subject a metal to electrolytic action as the anode of a cell in order to coat for protection
âšī¸
Here is when it was announced:
RAZR V3: One of the world's thinnest clamshell phones. Using unique metal materials and extreme miniaturization, the V3 measures just 0.54" thin. Includes a large TFT main display, color external display, internal antenna, VGA camera, long-range Bluetooth, and quad-band GSM. Available worldwide Fall 2004.
https://www.phonescoop.com/news/item.php?n=922 »
Don't you love the research I have done? đ
Made of aircraft grade aluminum.
http://direct.motorola.com/ENS/NationalHome.asp?Coun ... »
^From the Moto website.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v317/RUFF1415/RAZR ... »
^Again, on a photo host just incase it isn't still on the site tomorrow.
And the research continues... đ
Do you really still believe that the RAZR is made out of plastic?!?! HAHAHAHAHAHA... đ
This person thought he (I'm assuming it's a guy) knew his **** and decided to laugh at my "stupidity and lack of research" over something that he knew jackshit about and obviously was wrong. After I proved him wrong once, he can't admit he was indeed wrong. After not only I proved him wrong but another too, he can't admit he was wrong. After I proved him wrong not once, not twice, bu three tiems...well you get the picture. He can't just continue to sit there and deny the facts. He wants to be an asshole, I can give it right back.
Plus, I think I'm owed an apology.
It is so frustrating to have a straightforward question, and then the different factions use the rest of the forum to try and take pot shots at each other and prove their masculinity.
I would like to follow up with a question or two for anyone who could offer some insight. Aside from the debate whether the RZR performance may or may not be on par, does the phone truly offer any breakthrough characteristics or features? And, could the phone concept be refined to make it extremely functional, practical, and outstanding while maintaining its size and look?
I think that thinner is better assuming that all other variables stay the same such as quality, reception, features, etc...
https://www.phonescoop.com/phones/phone.php?p=547 »
Other than the features listed for the GSM RAZR, I believe there is only one major difference. The CDMA RAZR will have a 1.3 MP camera, instead of the standard VGA camera. If you're mainly worried about the call quality and reception, I've used this phone personally and it is one of the better Motos in those areas out there. This would probably be the only Moto I would give a chance if I was going to feel comfortable that I will be able to make and hold a clear call.
Just a side note, the CDMA RAZR won't be quite the same dimensions as the GSM RAZR becuase...
(continues)
RUFF1415 said:...
Take a look at the specs, and some of the reviews to get a better idea of the features and functions that the phone will have:
https://www.phonescoop.com/phones/phone.php?p=547 »
Other than the features listed for the GSM RAZR, I believe there is only one major difference. The CDMA RAZR will have a 1.3 MP camera, instead of the standard VGA camera. If you're mainly worried about the call quality and reception, I've used this phone personally and it is one of the better Motos in those areas out there. This would probably be the only Moto I would give a chance if I was going to feel comfortable that I will be able to make and hold a clear call.
Just a side note, the CDMA RAZR won't be quite the same
(continues)
RUFF1415 said:
Congratulations. đ
The second (the first being me) person on earth pleased with the overall performance of their Motorola product (I had the t730 for a while...never had a problem with it).
But I am a gadget freak, so all the features would make up for any problems anyhow. Call quality is awesome, nice and clear. custom ringers are LOUD!
muchdrama said:
Perhaps this will beef up the torsional rigidity...I've heard of RAZRs literally folding over in people's pockets. Industrial grade aluminum my keister.
If the CRAZR (CDMA RAZR) is a little thicker than the current RAZR, then yes, that would definitely help tons in the rigidity department.
Apparently, all else being equal, if you double the diameter of a tube it becomes eight times more rigid, i.e. rigidity is cubed, not just doubled. So apparently, with phones, as with women, there is such a thing as 'too thin'. đ
BetterThanJake said:muchdrama said:
Perhaps this will beef up the torsional rigidity...I've heard of RAZRs literally folding over in people's pockets. Industrial grade aluminum my keister.
If the CRAZR (CDMA RAZR) is a little thicker than the current RAZR, then yes, that would definitely help tons in the rigidity department.
Apparently, all else being equal, if you double the diameter of a tube it becomes eight times more rigid, i.e. rigidity is cubed, not just doubled. So apparently, with phones, as with women, there is such a thing as 'too thin'. đ
And on today's Maury..."Thick Women...Yea or Nay?". Uh, yea!
Verizon's "largest" network relies on analog in some places and without it your won't recieve a signal in places outwest, or very rural areas. For this reason most of their phones include AMPS capability which is basically a space hog for the phones. The only way that the phones are going to get thinner is if the AMPS technology is removed and they sacrifice a few other features, and I'm not sure many people would want that.
There, I answered your question. đ
RUFF1415 said:
Verizon's "largest" network relies on analog in some places and without it your won't recieve a signal in places outwest, or very rural areas.
Huh? I need analog to recieve a signal on Verizon if I'm 'out west'? That's sure news to me. I'm in California, and very few places here are analog.
Now, there are some fairly large swathes of land in states like Texas, Oregon, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah that are analog for Verizon, but those areas tend to be way out in the boondocks where few ppl live. Most folks would seem to be on the digital network, even 'out west'.
mrbrowngreen said:
Does anyone know if Verizon is going to bring out any thin handsets or are we always going to be stuck with these walking handcannons? It seems like the other providers are always carrying better products.
Actually, having a 'walking handcannon' sounds kinda neat. Where can I get one of those? đ