No more "I moved outside of coverage" to waive ETF
I don't agree with this, personally, but I do feel that some people abuse the old policy too often. I'm perfectly ok with having to show that I'm outside of coverage, but people come into the store all the time to cancel BEFORE they move out of coverage. I feel that if you're going to claim you're moving somewhere outside of coverage, you should prove that you're living in that area by actually living there, bills and all.
Alternate path, have someone AOL your line. 🙂
(AOL = Assumption of Liability; Basically they take over the line, pay the bills and are financially liable for it)
This is not cool for the people that really do not get service or move outside of the vzw footprint. But sadly the dishonest people have yet again ruined it for everyone.
Not sure what I am talking about? Google 'getting out of a verizon wireless contract'
http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1 ... »
Bulletin Board postings, websites, forums, even youtube movies... I once saw someone that for $25 he would forge the documents you needed to get out of your cell carrier contract. (not something I approve of and will not provide further details)
So before the mass of people...
(continues)
Probably costs them a lot of money to subsidize a phone price, have the customer move out of range (waiving the ETF and losing the subsidy), and then the customer will sell the phone to a friend at a dirt-cheap price. It's about time this was corrected.
With Sprint, there was someone who would sign up for service on his friend's in-coverage address, get an expensive phone cheap, and then give them proof of his actual out-of-coverage address to get out of the contract. Then, he'd resell the phone, often at a profit. Repeated the process every 2 months for a year before he was caught.