Home  ›  Carriers  ›

Verizon

Info & Phones News Forum  

all discussions

show all 46 replies

Crappy new Verizon plans.

davidl340

Jan 17, 2005, 11:16 AM
"Can you hear me now? We are now offering lower granularity on our plans, and for some local markets (MS), you get less minutes for your money. Our strategy to keep customers from going to Cingular is to take away some of their choices"

🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄
...
electrica

Jan 17, 2005, 11:24 AM
In most markets these new plans will increase a customer's minutes without increasing their cost per line. Not to mention save customers with 3 or more lines on a share plan money. It won't really effect any customers with two person share lines so ... what do they care? They can't get a lousy $49.99 plan anymore. Big deal! If they liked the plan enough, they'd already be on it and in that case they can keep it.

Stop being a cynical jerk and posting pointless crap like this. 🙄
...
davidl340

Jan 17, 2005, 11:37 AM
Hello, wake up, how do you call having no minutes between 450 and 900 anything but bad. On my budget, having those increments makes a difference. My local plan went down in minutes for the same price and took away increments, it's either 500 or 1000, no step between, I don't see any advantage for me. Don't know about the sharing lines deal, hopefully someone is getting something good out of the new deal.

Pointless is your last comment, not mine.
...
electrica

Jan 17, 2005, 5:14 PM
Okay, like I said ... if the customer was so damn infatuated with a $49.99 plan, they'd already be on it! And in that case, stay! No one is tellig you that you have to change, are they?
...
Corpo Rat

Jan 17, 2005, 11:31 AM
davidl340 said:
"Can you hear me now? We are now offering lower granularity on our plans, and for some local markets (MS), you get less minutes for your money. Our strategy to keep customers from going to Cingular is to take away some of their choices"

🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄

In the Houston/GC markets, the minutes went down too, at least, on the LDC plans. The way it was explained to me is this:

1. VZW as a company is trying to push people away from local plans due to roaming issues(!) and the fact that people with LDC plans tend to churn more than people on the AC plans.

2. When you give people more than 2-3 choices, they tend to get brain lock. I sort of agree with this. When you...
(continues)
...
Aleq

Jan 17, 2005, 2:24 PM
Corpo Rat said:
3. Shut up and sell what you have. No kidding. Somebody actually was overheard saying this to a coworker of mine.


It's a valid point, albeit rudely expressed. As a sales person, you just have to deal with what's available, because if YOU have a bad attitude about the company product, it WILL carry over to your customer. Part of sales is emphasizing the good points while downplaying the weak ones, and hoping the company brass wakes up and makes your job easier some morning. Believe me, as a TMobile rep my life got SOOOOO much easier as soon as we brought out the new 45.99 1000 N/W plan, especially dealing with credit limit accounts... 😉
...
BetterThanJake

Jan 17, 2005, 9:03 PM
Corpo Rat said:
1. VZW as a company is trying to push people away from local plans due to roaming issues(!) and the fact that people with LDC plans tend to churn more than people on the AC plans.

Why would local plans have more roaming issues than the AC plans? Beyond the obvious 'if you're out of the local area' ones?

It seems like if someone signed up for a local plan, they'd be aware that its a LOCAL plan and not get mad if they roam out of their local area and get charged for it. Then again, I may be assuming too much rationality here.

But if you stay within your local area, you wouldn't run into any more roaming than you would on an AC plan, si or no?
...
mycool

Jan 17, 2005, 10:51 PM
BetterThanJake said:
Corpo Rat said:
1. VZW as a company is trying to push people away from local plans due to roaming issues(!) and the fact that people with LDC plans tend to churn more than people on the AC plans.

Then again, I may be assuming too much rationality here.


You are assuming too much rationality here...
...
juice13

Jan 29, 2005, 12:00 PM
The local plans on average use more local roaming partners, therefore as a company it costs verizon more money to provide a local plan than a national plan. If you visit a Verizon store or view their coverage plans online, you will notice that the local plans (especially out west) offer more coverage in the limited areas they do cover than the national plans.
...
BetterThanJake

Jan 17, 2005, 2:33 PM
I'm just annoyed that the local plan minutes didn't go up... that was the only part of the rumor that didn't come true.

Oh well... at least I got on the Local 600 for $39.99 promo while it was still running (it still is here in California).
...
Aksarben

Jan 17, 2005, 3:19 PM
Not that it affects me but the LDC Family Share option went away as well (no longer available).
...
JDigital

Jan 17, 2005, 6:39 PM
In my market the LDC plans are not affected at all by the new America's Choice promos. Local plans did not change, and customers can still sign up on Family Share plans also.
...
mycool

Jan 17, 2005, 10:52 PM
They are grandfathered in until 01/31/05 ... then they go bye-bye. So really the LDC and LDC FSP are still available, but only until 01/31/05.
...
BetterThanJake

Jan 18, 2005, 5:14 AM
mycool said:
They are grandfathered in until 01/31/05 ... then they go bye-bye. So really the LDC and LDC FSP are still available, but only until 01/31/05.

Whaa? No more LDC plans, period, after 1/31? Am I interpreting this correctly?
If I am, no more LDC would kinda suck. I admit I'm sorta thinking of switching to an AC 450 plan to save the 5 bucks a month on long distance, but still, it seems a lot of ppl would want to jump on that LDC 600 promo. If you're seldom out of state, its a great deal.

Not to mention that, even without promos and even with the recent improvements to AC minutes, LDC still offers 50-200 minutes more than ADC, depending on price level.

I thought the recent spate of mergers was...
(continues)
...
mycool

Jan 18, 2005, 8:24 AM
No... the NEW LDC plans will be available after 01/31/05 ... but until then they offer the same ones as before... I do believe the NEW ones will offer the same minutes but only at 3 different levels...

I think it's 39.99, 59.99 and 79.99 but I could be wrong on one of those. AFTER 01/31/05 those will be the ONLY ones offered... until then, the other ones can still be gotten including the 49.99 plan.
...
BetterThanJake

Jan 18, 2005, 2:24 PM
Whew... well, that's way better. Except for the part about no more $49.99 plans.

Seems like a ploy on VZW's part to increase revenue. A lot of average users are somewhere around that sweet spot, and may have to bump up to the $59.99 plan. Still kinda ugly for consumers. ☚ī¸
...
VZW_insider

Jan 20, 2005, 10:49 AM
Just a quick comment, a majority of customers are on the $39,99 plan or the $59.99 plan. Very few customers choose the $49.99 - 500 minutes which is why they got rid of the plan.
...
BetterThanJake

Jan 20, 2005, 2:24 PM
Few customers were on the $49.99 plans because of the way Verizon graduated the minutes.

For LDC for $40/50/60 it was 500 or 600 minutes(promo)/700/1000.

For old AC it was 400/500/800.

If the $50 level had been a true intermediary step, instead of giving not much more minutes than $40, more ppl would have chosen it.

Again, I think it works out to be a revenue-enhancer for VZW to get rid of the $50 level... a lot of ppl will be caught in the big gap between the 450 and 900 minute levels in AC and have to go up to the $60 level to avoid overages.

Ditto on the new LDC (which I've heard will have a monster step between 550 and 1100 minutes).
...
Celling_it

Jan 21, 2005, 10:20 AM
Who cares you are only talking about a difference or 10.00 per month (difference in old 500 min to 800 min plan)? People spend that much on lunch in one day. VZW is selling value. Double your minytes for only and extar 20.00 per month. That sounds pretty sweet to me. Take a bag lunch to work 2 times per month and you will have the extra 10.00 that you need.
...
BetterThanJake

Jan 21, 2005, 2:26 PM
$10 a month works out to $120 per year... it definitely adds up. Why should a consumer not care about that amount of money? Puzzling. 😕
...
VZWCustServ

Jan 22, 2005, 1:39 PM
Because $120 isn't a lot of money. it's less than half a percent of what the average american makes in a year.
...
BetterThanJake

Jan 22, 2005, 2:20 PM
Trust me... lots of ppl do indeed care about saving $120. Under your premise, Amazon.com shouldn't exist, since you're 'only' saving 5-10 bucks per movie DVD.

Matinee movie pricing? Ditto.
Fast food? Ditto.

C'mon, let's be real now. 🙄
...
bleu_tropix

Jan 23, 2005, 1:12 AM
I have to agree with you on this one because, as a full-time college student on federal pell grants and part-time working on campus...$10 does indeed look like a lot of money on a phone bill. I don't think comparing it to food is reasonable, because we have to eat to live...lol. And if they're going to do away with the "in between" plans like I said earlier...the only ones benefitting are those with the extra cash and VZW corporate.

At least that's how I see it. Just my $0.02 😕
...
SPCSVZWJeff

Jan 20, 2005, 9:33 PM
Why is it so weird for a carrier to push customers to the $59.99 level? Cingular does it with additional lines on their plans. If you want a 9.99 additional line you need to sign up for a 59.99 or higher price plan.
Wireless carriers are not out to save their customers money, they are out to make money just like everyone else is. Companies like Cricket, Unicel, Metro PCS and T-Mobile know what their network is worth to their customers. Their churn rates speak for themselves. If all of those carriers customers think they are getting such a good deal then why are they leaving? On the other hand if Verizon is so overpriced then why are they growing so fast and why are so few of their customers leaving?
The facts seem to support the notion th...
(continues)
...
BetterThanJake

Jan 21, 2005, 1:56 AM
SPCSVZWJeff said:
Why is it so weird for a carrier to push customers to the $59.99 level?

Well, at least you admit that's what they're doing. Some reps would have a hard time being as forthright.

As far as the rest of it goes... yes, I'm sure we're all quite aware that Verizon is in this to make money. Still... do you make more money pushing ppl to a $60 level they don't want to go to, or do you make more money by building customer loyalty though giving them the kind of choices that fit their needs?

Short-term, the answer is probably the former, but long-term, the jury's out. And its not like the competition is going always going to be playing New Jersey Generals to Verizon's Harlem Globetrotters. On...
(continues)
...
muchdrama

Jan 21, 2005, 9:29 AM
BetterThanJake said:
SPCSVZWJeff said:
Why is it so weird for a carrier to push customers to the $59.99 level?

Well, at least you admit that's what they're doing. Some reps would have a hard time being as forthright.

As far as the rest of it goes... yes, I'm sure we're all quite aware that Verizon is in this to make money. Still... do you make more money pushing ppl to a $60 level they don't want to go to, or do you make more money by building customer loyalty though giving them the kind of choices that fit their needs?

Short-term, the answer is probably the former, but long-term, the jury's out. And its not like the competition is going always going to be playing New Jersey Gener
...
(continues)
...
SPCSVZWJeff

Jan 21, 2005, 11:29 AM
In my opinion it is kind of irresponsible for a carrier to major in discounts when so much of the country is not adequately covered.
Ever notice how many T-Mobile people churn to Verizon or another carrier for coverage reasons?
Building out a wireless network takes money, that money comes from customers.
Verizon could be like T-Mobile and build the cheapest network possible, not cover all of a city or the surrounding areas and depend on roaming agreements within their own licensed markets for coverage.
Discounters are terrible at overall service. They may excel at certain areas but cannot afford to offer the complete package. Where would you rather eat a hamburger, McDonalds or Red Robin?
...
muchdrama

Jan 21, 2005, 12:49 PM
SPCSVZWJeff said:
In my opinion it is kind of irresponsible for a carrier to major in discounts when so much of the country is not adequately covered.
Ever notice how many T-Mobile people churn to Verizon or another carrier for coverage reasons?
Building out a wireless network takes money, that money comes from customers.
Verizon could be like T-Mobile and build the cheapest network possible, not cover all of a city or the surrounding areas and depend on roaming agreements within their own licensed markets for coverage.
Discounters are terrible at overall service. They may excel at certain areas but cannot afford to offer the complete package. Where would you rather eat a hamburger, McDonalds or Red Robin?
...
(continues)
...
BetterThanJake

Jan 21, 2005, 2:23 PM
muchdrama said:
Did you ever think that this is a Verizon corporate mandate and the employees have no say in it at all? When my employees were selling Verizon phones, the yard stick for success was how many $59.99 plans they sold. And this was Circuit City.

I'm aware that's its a corporate mandate and that the reps have to play the cards they're dealt, for good or bad. Its just that some reps defend policies that aren't so good sometimes.

Oh, and to reply to another of your posts and kill two birds with one stone: Red Robin is a chain that has stores out here in California. And yes, they do make a mighty fine burger... way better than the fast food joints 🙂
...
muchdrama

Jan 21, 2005, 8:52 PM
BetterThanJake said:
muchdrama said:
Did you ever think that this is a Verizon corporate mandate and the employees have no say in it at all? When my employees were selling Verizon phones, the yard stick for success was how many $59.99 plans they sold. And this was Circuit City.

I'm aware that's its a corporate mandate and that the reps have to play the cards they're dealt, for good or bad. Its just that some reps defend policies that aren't so good sometimes.

Oh, and to reply to another of your posts and kill two birds with one stone: Red Robin is a chain that has stores out here in California. And yes, they do make a mighty fine burger... way better than the fast food joints 🙂
...
(continues)
...
bleu_tropix

Jan 21, 2005, 9:46 PM
I personally use the LDC 49.99 plan, and quite frankly, I think it's the best plan they have (locally of course) because you get 1000 anytime, free LD, free n/w, free IN...so that would definitely suck if they do away with the 49.99/month option...it already sucks that they don't have it on the AC plans ☚ī¸ What are people supposed to do who need the "in between" minutes? Cos right now, as I see it, it's either too little minutes, or too much 😕
...
mycool

Jan 21, 2005, 10:23 PM
They are looking to increase ARPU simply put.

Also, it wouldn't help them out when they tie it into their Double or Triple your minutes advertising -- for $20 more than $39.99 you double your minutes or for $40 more than $39.99 you triple your minutes. What would they say for the $49.99 plan?? For $10 more than $39.99 you get 1.5 times as many minutes! or whatever.
...
QuasiMoto

Jan 18, 2005, 8:54 AM
Verizon effectively raised the rates Amer Choice rates with the new Family Plans and eliminated some minutes levels, while falsely advertizing 25% more minutes, with 9.99 additional phones. This is a huge ripoff.

For instance, my 149.99 3,000 minute AC plan with 20.00 for 1 additional phone = 169.99. Now the new plans have 149.99 for 2,500 monutes (plus .25 for the other 500 minutes = +125.00 to get to 3,000) = 274.99 (a $105.00 increase). There is no 3,000 minutes plan option, only 2,500 and 3,500 plans in this range. The other plans still get all the same free IN and nights/weekends calling as well.

In most if not all cases, one is better off with the other plans and paying $20 for an additional line (if you have 4 extra lines ...
(continues)
...
BigMacDoodle

Jan 18, 2005, 12:33 PM
You can keep your plan, you don't have to change. I will. My tier is a better deal for me if I change. When companies change plans, it doesn't always suit the needs of all their customers.
...
GWFOX

Jan 18, 2005, 1:25 PM
#1. There is nothing false or deceptive about these rate plans. Your title statement is completely wrong

The standard plan of $79.99 family share is DOUBLE the family share of $59.99. The $79 rate plan is double the minutes of the $59 plan.

These plans are geared more toward the mid-range and the low-range user. You are in the 3000 minute plan bracket with a family share.

You could easily switch your plans around to take advantage of the new pricing. $99.99 for 2000 minutes on one phone, $59.99 for 900 minutes on another phone. You would be saving approximately $10. This is just a speculation since I have NO idea of your usage. Heck if one of your lines has almost a zero usage, you could save ALOT of money but splitting your plans u...
(continues)
...
VZWCustServ

Jan 28, 2005, 1:08 PM
Hey, my wife and I have 39.99 + 20.00 right now, but we just hit the 1 year mark. Since she's getting a new phone we have to go to the new plans. 59.99 for 2 lines on family share, same as we are paying now, the only difference is that we will get 500 minutes instead of 400. Since this is the first month we have ever gone over (by about 25 mins) The change has come just in time. I can't believe people are complaining about more minutes for less money. The times when this hurts the customer are RARE exceptions. This change will help all of VZW's new and existing customers by giving them more for their money. It will also keep VZW competitive with Cingular.
...
Stevo2k4

Jan 20, 2005, 3:00 PM
davidl340 said:
"Can you hear me now? We are now offering lower granularity on our plans, and for some local markets (MS), you get less minutes for your money. Our strategy to keep customers from going to Cingular is to take away some of their choices"

🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄



I don't think the plans are crappy... but

I would like to point out that now with the early upgrade policy on 2 yr contracts with another 2 yr contract after one year of having the phone. Northeast area at least now requires a $59.99 rather than a $49.99 PPLAN.
...
bmore

Jan 20, 2005, 7:24 PM
so does that mean you get to upgrade your phone early if you sign another 2yr contract at the halfway point in your original 2yr contract? did i understand correctly? and if so what kind of upgrade would you be eligible for thanks bro also i live in baltimore this is the northwest right? thanks
...
Stevo2k4

Jan 22, 2005, 10:41 AM
bmore said:
so does that mean you get to upgrade your phone early if you sign another 2yr contract at the halfway point in your original 2yr contract? did i understand correctly? and if so what kind of upgrade would you be eligible for thanks bro also i live in baltimore this is the northwest right? thanks


Yes, that's exactly what it means... And sometimes it's a misconception that taking another 2 year contract doesn't tack 2 years on and make it three years, it just forgets about what you had and makes the contract two years. And yes, you're definately Northeast area in Baltimore.

~Steve
...
bmore

Jan 22, 2005, 1:11 PM
thanks steve what kind of upgrade am i eligible for at the halfway point? i get the prorated price on a new phone like a new customer? im following you thanks again
...
GWFOX

Jan 22, 2005, 1:26 PM
Steve is 110% correct about the early upgrade program. That is how I make alot of my money nowadays!

You will be eligable to purchase a new phone at the upgrade price AND be able to take advantage of any promo price/promo plan at that time. Just like a customer that has finished their contract, or is signing up for the first time.

Cool huh?
...
bmore

Jan 23, 2005, 10:06 PM
but if you do the early upgrade and sign a new 2yr contract you are not eligible for the ne2 program until 2 years from the new contracts ending period, right? thanks!!
...
Stevo2k4

Jan 26, 2005, 11:40 AM
Exactly.

Sorry for the delayed response... out of town on business.

~Steve
...
Zaniphan

Jan 26, 2005, 2:24 PM
Don't forget, early upgrade requires that at the time of upgrade, you have to move to a price plan of $49.99 or higher. On the bright side of that, part of the worry free garantee you can change back to the $39.99 the day after you upgrade 😛
...
Stevo2k4

Jan 26, 2005, 5:31 PM
Actually, now that there is no $49.99 price plan (as of 1/17/05) it is required that the customer accept a $59.99 pplan or higher, with an average monthly revenue of $49.99 or higher (which takes into account any monthly discounts a customer may have).

~Steve
...
Zaniphan

Jan 26, 2005, 5:37 PM
:LOL: Kudos to you, I totally forgot about it, I feel ashamed. For those who want the 300 min plan but still wants to upgrade early, add pckgs to make your avg revanue 49.99 or higher, then delete them 😛
...
Stevo2k4

Jan 28, 2005, 10:34 AM
Zaniphan said:
:LOL: Kudos to you, I totally forgot about it, ... 😛


Thanks for the kudos, they're quite delicious...

😛

~Steve
...

You must log in to reply.

Please log in to report a message to the moderator.


all discussions

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Threads Follow @phonescoop on Mastodon Phone Scoop on Facebook Follow on Instagram

 

Playwire

All content Copyright 2001-2024 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.