AT&T Publishes Public Letter Refuting Verizon Wireless Ads
Article
Comments
‹ all discussions
show all 6 replies
Correct me if I'm wrong but...
This whole "legal" battle between AT&T and VZ its kinda like if McDonald's went after Burger King for their double cheese burger adds comparing the size of their double cheese burgers to McD's double cheese burgers 🤤 or even if Microsoft 😈 went after Apple 😈 for the PC VS MAC commercials. Those companies dont have time for all that when they are just standing on their own two feet just fine. Shouldn't AT&T do the same. (not an AT&T hater or VZ lover by any means also 🙂 )What do yall think 🙄
...
I totally agree. The adds are the exact same idea. I don't know why AT&T thinks they are any different.
...
...Verizon is claiming in their ads that an AT&T customer won't have service at all outside of a 3G area.
Not the same.
...
I am looking at a poster right now, it says "Want the Largest 3G network?" and shows the two maps.
In the fine print, it says when the info was gathered with VZW and AT&T websites to back up the info. SOOOOO.... where does it say you won't have any service at all?
...
Who sees the fine print on a TV ad?
...
Well AT&T should to avoid losing money by the lawsuit. Don't you make sure that you read the fine print when you sign something like a car or something major? Who is at fault for not reading the fine print? If there was no fine print THEN it would be a big deal. The fine print is there for a reason
...
No it does not. It is the way you comprehend the commercial. This is why there is a lawsuit. BECAUSE AT&T took the commercial the wrong way. If you look at that commercial again, look at the tiny, tiny, fine print on the bottom of the screen.
...
This forum is closed.
‹ all discussions