Union Authorizes Strike Against AT&T
With so many people unemployed right now
Just because you have a union, doesn't mean you are immune to the reality of the times.
Just because you don't understand the obligations and business strategies required to keep a company growing, does not other's can't either. Didn't AT&T just cut over 20K jobs last year?
A strike is a risk. Apparently it's a risk the members have agreed is worth taking. Is your union going to pay your rent for you while you are not going to work (and as I und...
(continues)
taoareyou said:...
I don't see this strike sitting well with the general public. Refusing to work because you are not getting a raise and you are having to pay some more for your health care is not an uncommon union move, but doing so in a recession with unemployment on the rise is just really bad timing.
Just because you have a union, doesn't mean you are immune to the reality of the times.
Just because you don't understand the obligations and business strategies required to keep a company growing, does not other's can't either. Didn't AT&T just cut over 20K jobs last year?
A strike is a risk. Apparently it's a risk the members have agreed is worth taking. Is your union going to pay your rent for you while you
(continues)
Part of the dispute centers on unrealistic quotas being placed on workers by management that are intentionally designed to harass them into either quitting, or being fired.
Let's hope the unions have some documentation or management to testify to directly support this claim.
I know from personal experience this is an across the board practice that companies all over America are putting into place that allows them to legally harass and fire high paid workers that they then can replace with low wage, non-unionized contracted labor.
What can you reference to back up this claim?
...
The end result of letting corporations get away with doing this is that in the not so very
(continues)
taoareyou said:
Let's hope the unions have some documentation or management to testify to directly support this claim.
What can you reference to back up this claim?
Unfortunately, to do so would jeopardize my own job, even though these forums are set up with anonymous user names. I can tell you this: as a manager, I am privy to information that isn't shared with the folks out on the production floor. I know for a fact that management lies about the real purpose behind policies they implement, and many actively seek ways to terminate workers they dislike. This is reality.
taoareyou said:...
I don't think companies want to revert the economy to an early 1900's standard of living
(continues)
However, that does not mean every company is like that.
...
I know from personal experience this is an across the board practice that companies all over America are putting into place that allows them to legally harass and fire high paid workers that they then can replace with low wage, non-unionized contracted labor.
This is a pretty big claim. When I asked for validation you told me that you work for a really shady company that hires illegals and drug users and has management (which you claim to be pa
(continues)
the fact of the matter is that wireless companies need ARPU to go up. they need subs to go up. they want to make money like any other RETAIL store does. they need GOOD sales reps to do this.
while i agree that the company has made some questionable decisions, especially the piece of **** health benefits they offer, i do not agree that the retail reps need so much more time off and extra raises over what they already get, and even MORE quota relief.
management is not getting a raise this year PERIOD. the reps should be lucky for what...
(continues)
any workers who strike will not get quota relief while striking, so they are only hurting themselves.
second of all, they ARE the same as a rite aid worker - they are RETAIL REPS. they sell retail goods at a cash register. they work most holidays and weekends, including sundays. like i said i spent 2 years as a rep. i didnt try to fool myself into thinking i was something more than i really was. that's why i moved on.
i could care less about them "taking my raise". i still make more in base pay than them.
and, no, i dont wish i had a union to stand behind me. i had that for 2 years. i paid my dues. i didn't see a return on that investment.
so many "write ups" ge...
(continues)
jinx7676 said:...
first of all, i making a general statement and then following it up with a detail statement, providing more specifics as to the REASONS people here arent going to strike.
second of all, they ARE the same as a rite aid worker - they are RETAIL REPS. they sell retail goods at a cash register. they work most holidays and weekends, including sundays. like i said i spent 2 years as a rep. i didnt try to fool myself into thinking i was something more than i really was. that's why i moved on.
i could care less about them "taking my raise". i still make more in base pay than them.
and, no, i dont wish i had a union to stand behind me. i had that for 2 years. i paid my dues. i didn't see a return on that in
(continues)
Azeron said:
I don't think the auto industry's problems can be placed solely on UAW. The fact that they dumped the EV technology that they had same as Toyota and allowed Toyota to leverage it for hybrids while they did nothing. The fact that their CEOs make more than their Japanese counterparts and are not as profitable play some role in it.
the american auto companies problems started WAY before hybrids were even an idea. i agree that the problems are not ONLY UAV, i think that is a major reason.
(continues)
This forum is closed.