Why does T-Mobile have far superior voice clarity then Cingular?
jinx7676 said:
could be the phone you used. some models sound better than others.
jinx7676 said:
i repeat:jinx7676 said:
could be the phone you used. some models sound better than others.
I repeat:
I know they are the same, I just can't believe it. T-mobile sounds so much better.
Cellenator said:jinx7676 said:
I know they are the same, I just can't believe it. T-mobile sounds so much better.
what phones did you compare? i guess i wasn't suggestive enough with my comment to convey this...
Cingular will have a little bit less voice quality but nothing should be drastic. We use 850 Freq which has a slight less call quality with a stronger output to get through buildings better.
Tmobile uses 1900 so the call quality will be a slight bit better.
In general, you cannot tell the difference and in that case it would revert back to what the past people said about maybe it is the phone because they can make a difference.
All other things equal there is NO difference between 850 MHz and 1900 MHz in call quality.
Where do you people come up with this crap?
xoxo
liamdeschain said:
they make it up as they go along. that's the whole point of the internet. nothing is a fact anymore.
xoxo
Is that a fact? 😉
texaswireless said:
What????????
All other things equal there is NO difference between 850 MHz and 1900 MHz in call quality.
Where do you people come up with this crap?
haha sorry i know its old.. but i missed that post.. thanks for being there Texas, i dub you our forum police to question all crap that comes through and to call him or her out accordantly
It is the same with Frequencies. Higher freq give off a better quality but lower coverage. Lower uses more battery power and has a slight less quality.
Do not call me stupid when you have no clue what you are talking about.
Let me restate that. Wrong phrasing.
Higher freq will not penetrate through buildings as well not coverage. They are able to produce a higher quality signal but at the same time more likely to be interrupted by structures.
Lower frequencies have a lower quality but send a stronger signal and can penetrate structures better.
Same as a wireless router or house phone. You use higher freg to get the quality signal but its easier to interrupt.
You think that, based on comparisons between AM and FM, lower frequencies do not produce better quality than higher frequencies.
While that is correct about AM and FM in most instances it has everything to do with the transmission type and quality at the source than the frequency in use.
Have you ever heard of AM Stereo? Not widely deployed but it makes AM sound awesome. But how could that be? According to you the frequency makes the quality so poor.
Furthermore, AM and the attached quality was first used because transmission of frequencies at higher ranges was not possible.
Anything else on which your theory is based? I am not an engineer but I understand basic physics. The q...
(continues)