Question About SE.
The I also bought the Sony Erricson T68.
They both could be in the same room, same position, and the nokia would have a FULL signal, and the t68 would have 1 or no bars. I exchanged it 2x before finally selling it.
Could someone please tell me if SE has made their phones better, or am I still going to get a phone that provides no signal.
Current blakjack owner. Love the signal it provides in MY area.
Let me know SE guys.! 🤤 🤤
The Sony Ericsson s710a was the highest performing model Cingular ever sold while it was in the lineup.
I would go as far as to say that SE is just as good as Nokia on reception nowadays.
Nokia really screwed it up for themselves with the Nokia 6102. Thankfully, they caught their mistake and brought out the 6102i but for my friends who got the 6102, the damage has already been done. Now they are avid Motorola fans.
sangyup81 said:
I will take it a bit further than these guys and say SE's are better than Nokia, especially when you put Clamshell Nokias in the mix.
Nokia really screwed it up for themselves with the Nokia 6102. Thankfully, they caught their mistake and brought out the 6102i but for my friends who got the 6102, the damage has already been done. Now they are avid Motorola fans.
Really? The 6102 was the highest performing clamshell cingular had released to date. also, nokia holds the patents for the codecs and all gsm manufactures pay them royalties.
I got the 6102 before the "i" came out and it's never missed a beat. Call-quality wise it's second only to my 6230. I've had the V3xx, 6126 and N75 and returned all of them as they couldn't match the RF and call quality of either the 6230 OR 6102 (and NOT the 6102i).
could that be why the motorolas performed better than the 6102?
I've been trying to upgrade now for almost a year and getting frustrated because I just can't find a phone that will provide the top consistent quality (for me and my area) that the 6230 & 6102 do.
I tried ...