Wombough SHUT UP AND GO BACK TO SPRINTS FORM>
We all understand that you prefer Sprint over Verizon. That is just fine. I honestly prefer Verizon Wireless over cingular, but that is my opnion. You may or may not be right on the "Sprint has a bigger footprint that verizon wireless thing". Sprint roams just as much as verizon wireless does if not more, but there is one big difference between them. Sprint has a roaming policy and Verizon Wireless does not. We may indeed roam more like you said.................but we do not have to worry about getting cancelled three months down the road for excessive roaming. So, as long as we(people with verizon wireless) have service or are roaming and are able to make calls I dont think anyone really gives a ****.
Thank Y...
(continues)
Adieu
Coverage, as you pointed out, is NOT a matter of opinion, it's a matter of FACTS! All any of these folks who wanna argue have to do is go to each website and see who covers the most people with their native network, and in so doing, they're gonna find out IT AIN'T VERIZON!
Coverage matters! And " most reliable" is worthless if you're out somewhere and can't make a call. I'm honest enough to admit that my Nextel, since it has no roaming, has pitiful coverage nationwide. You'll never get most of these guys to admit that, because a lot of the peop...
(continues)
😳
👿
Nah, just kidding.
Comparing celluar service to a pager is an apples to oranges debate.
As for footprint and all that jibberish... The true king is Cingular which easily trumps both Sprint and VZW.
As for the Sprints network I'm confused. Somebody please explain this to me. A couple of years back I was looking into different coverage because Sprint does have a very good voice network here in Phoenix and I was looking at their coverage maps and it was really really lacking. It really only coverage roads and cities. Now I look at Sprint's maps and its like covering all of the nation but when I look closer at the map I still see the same network in dark green, with a massive light green area.
...
(continues)
As for the pager/cellphone comparison, my point is everyone who is defending Verizon's pricing says that it's worth paying extra because they're so "reiable", and I'm saying that cellular service in generalis anything but reliable.
How can something be called reliable that has tons of dead and "no service" areas? if you werewaiting on an organ transplant, or had a sick family member at home who needed to get in touch with you at a moment's notice, wherever you wee, would you really trust that Verizon cellphone you carry?
Saying Verizon is more reliable than anyone else islike saying a Chevette is more reliable than a Pinto or Vega. Wouldyou drive to Californi...
(continues)
jrfdsf said:...
Well, all I can say is look at the coverage maps and compare the numbers.
As for the pager/cellphone comparison, my point is everyone who is defending Verizon's pricing says that it's worth paying extra because they're so "reiable", and I'm saying that cellular service in generalis anything but reliable.
How can something be called reliable that has tons of dead and "no service" areas? if you werewaiting on an organ transplant, or had a sick family member at home who needed to get in touch with you at a moment's notice, wherever you wee, would you really trust that Verizon cellphone you carry?
Saying Verizon is more reliable than anyone else islike saying a Chevette is more reliable than a Pinto or
(continues)
except for these trolls that keep posting worthless threads...