Why would you guys even bother!!!!!
Any ways... as I was saying...
Not like USCC, other carriers are National and don't concentrate in a certain areas causing to have many gaps. Unless they also have agreements with other carriers, you're out of luck if you're outside their network. That's why I personally prefer a local carrier that can give me better reception in my area. For those of you who travel, take advantage of the $35 National plan before it is discontinued.
Like I said, even USCC needs improvements in a couple of small areas and they are working on that (hopefully).
But based on the CBS report... USCC had the best reception in the chicagoland area.
I am located in New Hampshire. I can buy a Regional Plan from US Cellular that gives me more minutes than Verizon's plans of the same monthly cost, as long as I am located in any of 9 states in the northeast. I never travel outside those states, so "nationwide" plans mean nothing to me.
US Cellular's service in NH is better than Verizon's. They have their own towers in 85% of the state, and where they do not have their own towers, they roam (free with the Regional Plan) on Verizon, Sprint, whoever. So I have the best of both worlds -- US Cellular service, which is superior in NH, and Verizon or Sprint 0utside NH. And it's cheaper tha...
(continues)
1. The reply from the NH guy that doesn't travel throughout the country. Not all people travel that much, in fact 95% of all minutes used are within 50 miles of someones house. Now I understand that people don't want to p...
(continues)
maverick96 said:
Let's talk seriously why would any of you people in this forum even waste your time with such a pathetic company like US cell? Can anyone say horrible calling area!! I mean with a company like Verizon out there I don't understand what you people are thinking!!! REALLY!!
You can troll and bash all you want. Like the previous post, USCC rocks in Chicago. I was a Verizon customer for over seven years and I still love Verizon. But I get service which is equal or better than Verizon in Chicago and I pay much less.
1500 minute National Plan with no roaming for $45. I avoided USCC because it lacked a national plan at a reasonable price. Now it has it. Nothing wrong with Verizon but its plans c...
(continues)
maizeandblue said:
yeah that national plan is amazing, i just hope we aren't loosing money on it. if not, i could see something along those lines for all markets.
I think it will spread but with fewer minutes but include Mobile-to-Mobile or something else to makeup for the fewer minutes. An example would be a 1200 or 1300 minute plan with M2M.
Just my guess. I have no affiliation with USCC and do not know anyone with the company.
Please stop trolling and flamebaiting, or your account will be suspended.
Thank you.
You are not doing Verizon any favors by posting these things. You are making them look like a bunch of fools with no courtesy. I happen to know this is not the case.
Rich warned you in the T-Mobile forum.
(continues)
maverick96 said:
I would have U.S. cell but since I do travel alot I have Verizon. U.S. cell is reliable thanks to the cdma 1x
Weren't you talking bad about USCC.....?
I see... 😁
Or is it that your upset 😢 that you're locked into a contract with Verizon that you can't change to the USCC National plan.
Do you get service anywhere in the country with Verizon? I heard that if you're outside their network you're out of luck. USCC will give you coverage anywhere in the country.
Remember that USCC is still offering the National plan for a few more days. That can really work for you. If I was you, I'll pay the ETF because with the USCC's National plan you'll probably be saving more in the l...
(continues)