Home  ›  Carriers  ›

Sprint

Info & Phones News Forum  

all discussions

show all 18 replies

Samsung m620 release update?

Snuggles

Mar 24, 2007, 5:28 AM
Anybody?
...
wantacookie

Mar 24, 2007, 10:22 AM
4/1
...
jareddude42

Mar 24, 2007, 11:36 AM
yeah we got the marketing packets it looks sweet. they dont lie one bit though they tell it how it is with its 2.5 hours of talk time
...
Snuggles

Mar 24, 2007, 11:57 AM
what do you mean 2.5 hrs talk time, poor battery life? How about the camera quality? Screen? etc
...
poweredup

Mar 24, 2007, 12:06 PM
yes, poor battery life, considering that it is in a perfect testing enviroment. think about phones now that have a 3.5 hour talk time and you really get about 2.5 or maybe a little less depending on what other features you are using on the phone. other than that the main display is 176.220 pixel and the camera is 1.3 megapixel, trust me its an awsome looking phone. 😁
...
jareddude42

Mar 24, 2007, 12:10 PM
yeah almost enough to make any guy get a woodie haha it is sexy
...
jareddude42

Mar 24, 2007, 12:08 PM
its got small lcd on the front anf a huge one on the back after all it is a fully functional mp3 player as well. it also comes with what is called the extended battery wallet i presume a case with a back up battery similar to a energi to go type deal that is rechargable so it seems cool. 1.3 mega pixel camera. 1 display is 176x220 262k tft color display the other is 176x65 65k tft display
...
Snuggles

Mar 24, 2007, 12:15 PM
I thought it was 2 megapixel camera, so sprint won't get a high end phone that bests the M1?
...
poweredup

Mar 24, 2007, 12:26 PM
you want a digital camera, best but has some real good deals on them 😉
...
poweredup

Mar 24, 2007, 12:26 PM
😲 i meant best buy
...
Snuggles

Mar 24, 2007, 12:35 PM
you bastard, the best digital cameras for phones are the Sony and Nokia's, sweet cameras. But I'd like phone camera please. The m1 has nice phone
...
poweredup

Mar 24, 2007, 12:40 PM
lol yes the M1 does have a nice camera but i really dont see that much of a difference from a 1.3 to a 2 megapixel
...
Snuggles

Mar 24, 2007, 1:03 PM
it all comes down to the quality of the lens and the auto focusing feature. try the sony k790
...
jareddude42

Mar 24, 2007, 1:27 PM
you wont see much until you actually print them the 1.3 will blur anything bigger than a 4x6 where as the 2.0 you should be able to get a decent 8x10 provided your not using any digital zoom (haha i used to sell cameras)
...
poweredup

Mar 24, 2007, 1:35 PM
well that makes sence, never thought of it that way. thanks for the info, it will be helpful in the future when i tell a customer that and actually look like i know what i am talking about 😉 😁
...
Snuggles

Mar 25, 2007, 10:29 AM
yOUR RIGHT THE RESOLUTION HAS nothing to do with the quality, its merely the size of the photo, with larger resolutions able to be cropped and keeping detail. But never blow up a smaller resolution. Quality comes with the lens.
...
Boombaby

Mar 25, 2007, 1:01 PM
Guess what I found (It's not a pic, It's not a vid...)

http://img247.imageshack.us/img247/5264/samsungm620r ... »
...
walker24

Mar 25, 2007, 5:15 PM
i just saw that like 4 hrs ago too!
...
Boombaby

Mar 25, 2007, 11:30 PM
I have also found the thing that might answer all of your questions about the Samsung m620.... 🤤

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=VXVQS8BX »
...

You must log in to reply.

Please log in to report a message to the moderator.


all discussions

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Threads Follow @phonescoop on Mastodon Phone Scoop on Facebook Follow on Instagram

 

Playwire

All content Copyright 2001-2024 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.