Sprint Sues To Stop AT&T Purchase of T-Mobile
Sprint should be happy about the merger, unless they are liars.
If the acquisition would lead to increased prices and lower quality products as the justice department has claimed, Sprint would be better off after the acquisition.
Sprint would be able to add subscribers, not lose them, because of AT&T's higher prices and lower quality.
If you think about it, Sprint should only oppose the acquisition-as it has- if it thought that the merger would put it in a worse position by increasing the competitive pressures that it already face.
justfinethanku said:
... If you think about it, Sprint should only oppose the acquisition-as it has- if it thought that the merger would put it in a worse position by increasing the competitive pressures that it already face.
That is the point of the suit and third of the contentions.
"Sprint cites three key arguments against the merger:
1. It would harm customers by raising prices and hindering innovation.
2. It would give control of three-quarters of the market to just two companies: AT&T and Verizon, creating a duopoly.
3. It would create too much opportunity for anti-competitive behavior that could harm Sprint and other, smaller carriers."
This forum is closed.