Home  ›  News  ›

U.S. Cellular To Get uiOne Makeover

Article Comments  

all discussions

show all 8 replies

Ew. Ew. Ew. Ew.

Phydeaux

May 25, 2006, 1:47 PM
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm hating this "custom UI" business. Smacks of control more than it does under the guise of "ease of use" for the simplest of consumers.
...
alejandro

May 25, 2006, 5:27 PM
i have no idea what it even is.
...
captainplooky

May 25, 2006, 5:30 PM
What else is new?
...
GetUSC

May 26, 2006, 10:46 AM
You obviously do not know what you’re talking about. uiOne gives the end user the capability to skin their phone to your preference, not the carriers. Go to
    http://brew.qualcomm.com/brew/en/about/ui one.html
and get a little bit of education before you speak next time.
...
Phydeaux

May 26, 2006, 1:07 PM
Wow, feck off, dude.

I'm not talking about skinning and slapping on a pretty aqua face; how utterly freaking useless of you. I'm talking about uniformly making the underlying UI for the carrier, DISCOURAGING MANUFACTURERS FROM MAKING INTEGRATED HARDWARE/SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS IN THE FUTURE.

You seem to not know of the implications or of what we're talking about. I'm not talking about a freaking WinAmp style skin that keeps the functionality but changes the ****ING COLOUR.

Only a moron would call me out while not knowing the difference between a skin and the OS. Weak.

And your URL doesn't work without some tweaking. Good job at "failing t3h intarnet".
...
classic695

May 26, 2006, 2:19 PM
How can this change "smack of [the provider's] control" when the point is to give users more control over the appearance of their interfaces? Users have no choice over operating system now, so a provider forcing a user to use a different operating system is not any more control than the provider already has; providing a solution that allows users to chose the appearance, however, does give users more control than they currently have. I entertain little hope that you will understand, after seeing your previous response.
...
Phydeaux

May 26, 2006, 4:18 PM
The appearance is and should be irrelevant in the advancement of developing advanced and usable technologies for the phone, and yes, we do have a choice over different technologies and orientations and even the UIs by selecting different models of phone, from different manufacturers.

When you take control of the software, you get a dominating Microsoft-esque control scheme where the manufacturers are no longer driven to innovate their software and their R & D divisions that deal with human interface are wasted and useless, or hindered by the carrier's design.

There's more at stake here than changing a colour here or there, or rearranging where the icon for a phonebook goes. I'm talking about the manufacturer's features being blocked ou...
(continues)
...
jerry 12

May 26, 2006, 8:46 PM
sounds like verizon.i for one when i buy a motorola i want a motorola not some thing a carrier came out with. 👿
...
Phydeaux

May 27, 2006, 4:06 PM
Word.

I just realized that I was trying to argue with shills.

I mean, shoot guys. I work alongside you under the same company, but I'm not allowed to critique this questionable position? Because it is questionable on if it's actually the right choice for consumers. I feel the uniform carrier based OS' simplicity for troubleshooting grandma doesn't outweigh the cons of discouraging innovations in GUI development.
...

This forum is closed.

Please log in to report a message to the moderator.

This forum is closed.


all discussions

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Threads Follow @phonescoop on Mastodon Phone Scoop on Facebook Follow on Instagram

 

Playwire

All content Copyright 2001-2024 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.