Cingular Wireless Refutes Lawsuit Filed by The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights
"This lawsuit is completely without merit," said Joaquin Carbonell, Executive Vice President and General Counsel. "Cingular has spent nearly $10 billion in integrating and improving its networks in the 21 months since the merger was completed, leading to a significantly improved customer experience and the fewest dropped calls of any national carrier."
Since the merger, Cingular has made extensive improvements including broader coverage, fewer dropped calls, improved capabilities and improved churn.
Cingular today refuted the points made in a lawsuit filed against the company by the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights.
“This lawsuit is completely without merit,” said Joaquin Carbonell, Executive Vice President and General Counsel. “Cingular has spent nearly $10 billion in integrating and improving its networks in the 21 months since the merger was completed, leading to a significantly improved customer experience and the fewest dropped calls of any national carrier.
“Separately, we are considering our options with respect to the false and misleading statements made to the media by the lawyer that brought this case,” he said.
Among the improvements made by Cingular:
Broader coverage:...
(continues)
Especially the FCC complaints being down 53% and moving from fourth to second place in customer satisfaction surveys.
I wonder which research firm it was...
RUFF1415 said:
...especially the FCC complaints being down 53% and moving from fourth to second place in customer satisfaction surveys...
That's right! How immpresive is that?
If you work for them that's cool and all, but why try to support such an obviously crooked organization?
Forcing Customer's to Migrate to Cingular
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
AT&T to Cingular
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
We Just found a Way to force att customers to migrate
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
Either switch to cingular...or we'll switch for you!!!!
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
Former ATTWS Customers That owe Cing money
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
New Migration Policy?? WTF...
(continues)
captainplooky said:
Forcing Customer's to Migrate to Cingular
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
AT&T to Cingular
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
We Just found a Way to force att customers to migrate
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
Either switch to cingular...or we'll switch for you!!!!
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
Former ATTWS Customers That owe Cing money
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
New Migration Policy?? WTF??
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
You're so dumb it hurts.
You quo...
(continues)
You quoted some unfound rumors that who knows decided to post here (untrue BTW) just so you can have something bad to say! Let me start with each stupid link you posted here:
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&ff » ... (Not true) Did you even read how the thread started? "RUMOR" We NEVER forced ANYONE to migrate. Starting April 05. Never!
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&ff » ... (not true) We NEVER charged ETF to customers who migrated to Cingular. Does this even make sense to you? I mean, really?
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&ff » ... (Not true) After the merger the ALLOVER network was created. If you are a fool if you thought that customers were 'ro...
(continues)
Last month, a California state appeals court upheld a $12.1 million fine against Cingular for signing up customers faster than it could provide service and for imposing hefty cancellation fees without a trial period. The court also said Cingular must refund up to $10 million to people who were forced to pay as much as $550 to cancel their contracts.
What were you saying now?
I know. Imagine what my job was like telling customers "migrate over to Cingular and only pay $18 and a new phone" then "sorry, can't" then "you can, but you have to pay the ETF on ATT side" then "its all a mess up, go ahead and migrate like normal."
People were so mad.
What were you saying?
Anxiovert
We NEVER charged ETF to customers who migrated to Cingular. Does this even make sense to you? I mean, really?
I know. Imagine what my job was like telling customers "migrate over to Cingular and only pay $18 and a new phone" then "sorry, can't" then "you can, but you have to pay the ETF on ATT side" then "its all a mess up, go ahead and migrate like normal."
People were so mad.
I really thought you were smarter then this.
I am referring to Upgrade Fee. Two differnt things.
Do you even read what you post? You are starting to piss me off.
Since when Cingular has not given its customers a trial period? Could you please tell me? HUH? That's right, NEVER. All carrier are REQUIRED to give their customer at least 14 to try their new equipment. This is madated by the FCC!
Since when Cingular has not given its customers a trial period? Could you please tell me? HUH? That's right, NEVER. All carrier are REQUIRED to give their customer at least 14 to try their new equipment. This is madated by the FCC!
Exactly, which is why the court FORCED them to pay.
We aren't talking about what ifs and maybes here!
We are talking about FACTS that the COURTS found Cingular to be VIOLATING and ORDERED them to pay FINES.
Maybe you should reread that. Simply because you do not beleive it took place does not invalidate the court's decision.
captainplooky said:
The court also said Cingular must refund up to $10 million to people who were forced to pay as much as $550 to cancel their contracts.
blockquote>
You definatly can't read my friend. They haven't paid anyone, becuase they are going to court for this.
What's your point?
One plaintiff, Amy Frerker, a 28-year-old Seattle architect, said that shortly after the merger she began noticing that she no longer had cell reception in areas she once did. Over the next year and a half, she said, Cingular told her she would have to sign a new contract; live with her current cell service, which was being phased out; or pay a $175 termination fee to get out of her contract.
Go find me a post where someone here that chooses to be upfront about who they are backs any of your claims.
You have zero proof of any actual policies. You are taking the opinions of disgruntled (and usually ignorant) persons and turning them into fact.
Same old Pooky bear, reaching as far as ever.
The latest on loserwitness news at 5 PM.
Anxiovert said:Cingular has improved churn.
I didn't realize churn was something that they desired! 🙂
littlefuzzbear said:Anxiovert said:Cingular has improved churn.
I didn't realize churn was something that they desired! 🙂
Why taking what I quoted out of context? That was quoted as:
"Improved churn: The company’s overall churn rate (percentage of customers leaving the company monthly) has continued to decline – from 2.6 percent (pro forma) in the merger quarter (4Q04) to 1.9 percent in 1Q06."
Anxiovert said:littlefuzzbear said:Anxiovert said:Cingular has improved churn.
I didn't realize churn was something that they desired! 🙂
Why taking what I quoted out of context? That was quoted as:
"Improved churn: The company?s overall churn rate (percentage of customers leaving the company monthly) has continued to decline ? from 2.6 percent (pro forma) in the merger quarter (4Q04) to 1.9 percent in 1Q06."
That says improved churn! Improved means more in most any dictionary that you can find. If they meant less churn then that's what they should have said. Improved churn implies that there's *more* churn!
What dictionary are you using? 😳
RUFF1415 said:
Actually improve means "to better" which anybody that knows anything would know that to better churn, it must decrease.
What dictionary are you using? 😳
Strange. When did you say you learned to speak English?
So what dictionary are you using?
RUFF1415 said:
I didn't, because I don't have to. I thought it was pretty obvious that I did.
So what dictionary are you using?
You're entirely a lost cause. There's no use in trying to explain anything to you.
RUFF1415 said:
I didn't catch anything that you were trying to explain.
You appear to be slow on the uptake. I can't give classes in remedial English. Sorry.
I recall it being you that thought to improve meant to increase.
🤣
Please, go ahead and point out to me why I should be allowed the pleasure of joining your remedial English class. 🙄
"This lawsuit is completely without merit," said Joaquin Carbonell, Executive Vice President and General Counsel. "Cingular has spent nearly $10 billion in integrating and improving its networks in the 21 months since the merger was completed, leading to a significantly improved customer experience and the fewest dropped calls of any national carrier."
Yet, the truth is:
...
Last month, a California state appeals court upheld a $12.1 million fine against Cingular for signing up customers faster than it could provide service and for imposing hefty cancellation fees without a trial period. The court also said Cingular must refund up to $10 million to people who were force
(continues)
I expected nothing less from someone such as yourself.
For your childish comments regarding NSA still make me laugh and fondly remember how foolish I must have been at your age.
bocephus81
oh get over it they only spied on people with Suspected involvement with terrorists
Of course, even then I do not believe I denied facts so that I could maintain a warm happy fuzzy feeling instead of dealing with the nasty truth of reality.
http://www.forbes.com/home/intelligentinfrastructure ... »
The same was said regarding Kinkel versus Cingular, but the Federal courts found that:
We conclude that the prohibition on class arbitrations is unconscionable.
Much to the dismay of Cingular.
Yes, I know what you are going to say, SBC(att) owns 60% of cingular (soon 100%) but it was long before current Cingular initiatives.
Not much different then Verizon inheriting something from GTE or PrimeCo.
plooky, the real question is; why the hell do you care about any of this? Are you a champion for consumer rights or something? Companies get sued for stuff like this everyday. I work for Cingular and I could care less if they get sued as long as I keep getting a paycheck. I tell my customers the same thing if they ask me about it. I just tell them its not something they need to worry about.
RIM got sued this year, Apple got sued, VERIZON IS GETTING SUED RIGHT NOW, Sprint got sued, and Comcast gets sued all the time. All of these companies are still around making products and enjoying massive levels of success. SO ...
(continues)
1. Prior to the merger, AWS charged a $15 "discounted activation fee" (aka upgrade fee) for all equipment upgrades, whether done at a store or through customer service. Cingular charged an $18 fee for the same service. Phone companies are fee based service providers, we provide a service, we charge fees for the services provided. For approximately 10-12 months after the merger, Cingular charged an $18 upgrade fee, it's standard fee, for the upgrade from AWS calling plans/equipment to Cingular calling plans/equipment.
2. The only time a customer is charged an early termination fee is if they decide to terminate service and go to an entirely different carrier (verizon, tMobile, etc). Any customer who move...
(continues)
(continues)
These people see these lawsuits as a way to get money, but forget that sometimes it's not about the money but is more about principles.
Businesses should be held accountable for their misdeeds and not allowed to act without regard to ethics and laws simply because they are large.
There are numerous lawsuits against corporations, businesses, and people that have yielded positive results for everyone ranging from civil liberties, product safety, worker safety, and etc. etc.
I think it is funny that you dismiss the lawsuit considering the circumstances. Numerous customers have had issues across the ...
(continues)
(continues)
(continues)
asiatic1982 said:
The attorneys statement that "everyone" got worse service is laughable, There are millions -and I truly mean millions- of old ATT customers that are now enjoying their Cingular service and had a seamless transition, but nobody cares about that b/c happy people dont sue, its the people who feel wronged, whether they were or werent
I'm one of them!