Captainplooky for President?
These lawsuits will be settled in court, not on phonescoop. It is apparent that Cingular has done some shady business and this will come to light shortly.
I WAS a at&t/cingular customer through the migration process and everyone knows that it was SHADY as hell. I'm a customer that never complains about policies, but a migration fee and new contract?? That's BS. ๐คจ
Some people are just so ignorant it is painful.
texaswireless said:
So tell me troll, under what terms did they require you to sign a new contract? Was it to get a phone at a discount? And that fee? Oh yeah, the upgrade fee that EVERYONE PAYS.
Some people are just so ignorant it is painful.
Troll? I'm a former customer and you're a fat douche bag. You might want to be careful with name calling. We can both call each other names.
Next, I never said I was "required" to sign a new contract. However, I was called by Cingular at least once a week because they wanted me to go to their much better GSM service... HAHA, it sucked worse! It was a bunch of lies that sounded good at the time to the customers.
"EVERYONE" pays an upgrade fee?? Are you su...
(continues)
And that's coming from a former AT&T customer, now happily migrated Cingular customer.
I would have to disagree with you that the AT&T customer base was treated better. I am not sure if you are/were an employee, or customer. But I was a AT&T employee. On AT&T for the longest time we rarely charged an upgrade fee. Plus when Cingular first took over the AT&T side, they werent helping the customers all that much. There plans were higher, they did offer a rebate/trade in for AT&T phones , but it was almost embarassing. Back when the V600 was the hot phone to have ( whether it sucked or not ! ) was like a $20 trade in, when John Doe just paid $199.00 for it 2 weeks ago on AT&T.
It always the talk of our region ( Chicago ) that Cingular should have called it a buy out over a merger.
And no offense guy, but ATTWS was bleeding revenue and losing customers with those great "policies". They were giving away anything they could to keep what they had left.
ATTWS customers were treated fairly but they weren't going to get to keep the charity given to them at the end. Once their agreements were up that stuff was going bye bye. It isn't shady, it isn't unfair.
AT&T financial reports purely showed that the company was not in the gutter. That was purely a rumor created by SBC/Cingular in grounds of buying them. In fact, after the 3rd quarter of 2004 pre "merger" AT&T wi...
(continues)
The changes in the upgrade program do not work the way you state. That is speculation based on zero facts. If a customer is always roaming Cingular will not offer to subsidize another handset. It has nothing to do with monthly amount so long as it is reasonable (as I stated previously the FEW $14.99 - $24.99 single line plans may not be eligible but the rest are slated to be eligible).
Why don't you pull those financial reports you speak of and tell me about their growth. Forbes, WSJ, etc. must have been in on that rumor Cingular started huh?
Over paying sales reps
Over paying for customers
Slow, no or negative growth in customer base
Sounds like a bad business p...
(continues)
Regarding the profitabilty, I clearly stated that it was in a thread that I read. If its true , I dont know. Do I doubt it. No.
I will dig through my emails and see if I can find the articles. I as like many AT&T employees, followed the company and merger very closely. I ask you to do the same, show ME where it states in financial records that ATTWS took a dive, that they had a higher then normal retention drop on a constant basis.
Overpaying employees and customers in purely opinion. I could say that you are over paid for what you do. There was alot of people that made ATTWS their career. E...
(continues)
So you now admit that you made claims based on items from forum posts rather than factual information?
You don't know alot about this industry. I think you are in over your head in this conversation. Your opinion about the fact you enjoyed where you worked is great. But on every other point you make statements based on speculation, inuendo and rumor.
http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dis ... »
They are out there. If oyu care to know the truth you can do the other reasearch yourself.
I am a customer, not an employee. I signed a 2-year contract with AT&T on April 30, 2004. I then later signed a new 2-year contract with Cingular on February 5, 2005. I paid no upgrade fee (because it was waived), and was offered a reasonable deal on new equipment. The plan pricing was a little more expensive on the lower end for minutes but I decided to take a $10 step up in plan for 250 more minutes than I had with my AT&T plan. Rollover was included.
...
(continues)
And that friendly "advice" from your rep was purely the company driven "upsell". Start them off with the $59.99 plan , then try to add a line, if not work from there. As business practice that is good, but do take it as more sales technique then advice.
It was good advice, any way you look at it.
And you absolutely implied you were required to do a new contract. Tap dancing around it because you were called on your B.S. is pretty weak.
So, Nextel18, how exactly did they overpay for ATTWS? Any idea how much ATTWS spectrum would cost if purchased via auction? Now the towers they chose to keep? Now the customer base?
Sprint bought Nextel for close to 50 billion. Overpaid for them too I suppose? Add it up, between aquisition costs and the requirement to buy out all the affiliates the paid $50 billion for less spectrum, less towers and less customers.
Now, douche bag, counter me with facts.
texaswireless said:
What are you, ten?
And you absolutely implied you were required to do a new contract. Tap dancing around it because you were called on your B.S. is pretty weak.
So, Nextel18, how exactly did they overpay for ATTWS? Any idea how much ATTWS spectrum would cost if purchased via auction? Now the towers they chose to keep? Now the customer base?
Sprint bought Nextel for close to 50 billion. Overpaid for them too I suppose? Add it up, between aquisition costs and the requirement to buy out all the affiliates the paid $50 billion for less spectrum, less towers and less customers.
Now, douche bag, counter me with facts.
Ok, hold on... You can't call me the same name I called y...
(continues)
What, no response on the rest?
texaswireless said:
And you could have kept what you had and kept the same service through the end of your contract. I know plenty of ATTWS blue customers who are STILL happy with the service they have. How did it ONLY degrade for some and not others if it was intentional?
What, no response on the rest?
Oh sorry, you're **** sweat...
I can't explain how the service got worse after the merger - it just did.
Also maybe take into affect that the people who are "happy' are not heavy to moderate users. Of course if you use your phone once or twice a week to call aunt gertrude in Utah you wont see a problem bec...
(continues)
900 Mhz is NOT used in the United States
Switching bands does not in of itself degrade service. ATTWS sold dual band phones.
T-Mobile and Cingular had a joint venture in NY and CA. Cingular began to use the ATTWS system and sold out of the joint venture leaving T-Mobile sole ownership of the old Orange network and Cingular using the newly aquired blue network. ORANGE customers in those areas potentially experienced changes in coverage as they were converted to the new network but BLUE customers saw no change (same network).
Network integration is still going on. Markets switched first might have experienced issues due to trial and error but not conspriracy. Integrated markets have far superi...
(continues)
Amazing all these people have similar complaints and problems yet nothing ever happened.
The At&T TDMA customers have suffered unfair business practices and service degradation.
Perhaps you missed it, but in late May 2005 it was reported by Li Yuan, staff reporter for the Wall Street Journal that:
...
Cingular continues to push former AT&T Wireless customers to move from their old TDMA network to Cingular's newer GSM network, which requires those customers to upgrade their phones.
Although 28% of aftermerger Cingular subscribers are still using the old TDMA ne
(continues)
temerityboy said:
the company is investing close to nothing in that infrastructure, says Ed Reynolds, Cingular's network operations president. The TDMA network is "emptying out," and handles only 16% of Cingular's total air minutes, he says. Cingular says the combined network will ultimately improve coverage, but the integration will not be finished until June 2006.
Cingular has invested next to nothing in maintaining and repairing the TDMA network.
That comes from Ed Reynold's, the PRESIDENT of operations, how the hell can you possibly dispute that?
it said, investing close to nothing in that network... why expand or add towers etc. in a dying netowrk... you turned it around and said 'm...
(continues)
the company is investing close to nothing in that infrastructure
How do they repair and maintain it when no money is going into it?
temerityboy said:
the company is investing close to nothing in that infrastructure
How do they repair and maintain it when no money is going into it?
well answers.com says Investing The act of committing money or capital to an endeavor (a business, project, real estate, etc.) with the expectation of obtaining an additional income or profit.
so, by repairing and maintaining it is not the same as investing..............
LITTLE TO NO MONEY IS BEING SPENT ON IT PERIOD.
Now why won't someone repair my Commodore 64. I have an Intellivision with a broken controller. Damn them for not still making parts for it. Any why is no no readily available knobs for my 13" B&W 13 station TV anymore.
BECAUSE IT IS A WASTE OF MONEY!
mikeymancini said:
Also maybe take into affect that the people who are "happy' are not heavy to moderate users. Of course if you use your phone once or twice a week to call aunt gertrude in Utah you wont see a problem because you have little to base it off of.
I'm happy. I'm a moderate user. I was an AT&T customer for 5 months after the merge. I did not experience any service degredation.
I've since migrated to Cingular. The service is still spectacular. I still am a moderate user. And I could not be happier.
People will always have the mind to find things to complain about. Especially when they can sue and get money for it.
mikeymancini said:
Watch after this suit is over, Cingular will be coughing up some money for these peoples fees, etc.
I honestly do not think they will be, but we shall see.
I sure the responses will be upmost interesting.
(continues)
I did not think it was possible for a creature to live with its head up its ass.
Everything you have said is nothing but Cingular talking points all the while ignoring what other people have to say.
Oh and I guarantee I have listened to and helped to solve more problems in this forum in the last year than you have in your entire life.