Alpha Tag's and the MLife National Plan
theDMan said:
NO **** SHERLOCK, but since the plan isnt based on whos network your on, hence the alpha tags not indicating coverage how is this going to help you anymore, quit wating our time and think before you open your yap
Sorry, meant to say wasting our time, not waiting
Case in point: San Luis Obispo, CA, is covered under our current local plan, and not the national plan. Your alpha tag, since it's in our area, would read AT&T, but you would be roaming. If you called 611, yes, you would get us, but you'd better make sure you know your calling area when you do call and not just hang up after getting the AT&T Wireless IVR.
To sum up, you both bring up valid points tha...
(continues)
Alpha tags.. bad!
CC maps... GOOD!
I dont need to be a brain surgeon to help you get your head out of your ass where its obviously been stuck for a very long time. If the plan were based on where we have network solely then it would be finebut as Linguist said, there are areas where we have network that the plan does not cover. Obviously we both agree that alpha tags are bad, but as Linguist said, just calling and getting the AWS IVR doesnt tell you any more than the alpha tag as you can also get the AWS IVR if you happen to get another carriers IVR that detects you as AWS and routes you back to us. I'm not saying that custs shouldn't call care if they have questions, just that they can save everyone time if they use the available resources on the web to...
(continues)
Then again, I just got off a call where a guy was having problems in a place in the middle of one of our areas. Verizon cut off roaming agreements, and the maps don't reflect it. Go figure! My conclusion is that the AWS statement of us not guaranteeing coverage in our areas is pretty accurate. The coverage maps us CCR's have are still probably the best, I can agree with you on that one DMan.