I need help deciding on what to replace a A400 with... VI660, PM-6225, VI600 or VGA1000
Originally I was going to get the Sony Erickson Bluetooth Phone from Sprint. But after hearing various problems people had around here, even though they seem to be minor issues, I'm thinking I'll wait on the route until they release their next BT phone. But, for the time being, I'm thinking that it's time I part with my phone and get something a little more reliable and updated.
These are what I'm...
(continues)
jikhead said:
Sprint sells so many Sanyo's, Sprint now required them to change the signal meter so that it's on par with the other brands. Only to make them appear equal. The newer Sanyo's may only show a bar or two, but will still actually have a very high signal strength.
I always wondered how a Sanyo could display 5 bars in a crowded movie theater and still drop calls like they were hot potatoes.
muchdrama said:jikhead said:
Sprint sells so many Sanyo's, Sprint now required them to change the signal meter so that it's on par with the other brands. Only to make them appear equal. The newer Sanyo's may only show a bar or two, but will still actually have a very high signal strength.
I always wondered how a Sanyo could display 5 bars in a crowded movie theater and still drop calls like they were hot potatoes.
If that was a sarcastic remark, keep in mind you're probably in a thick concrete building...otherwise you may indeed have something wrong w/the phone.
I still have time to change my mind... I might go to the sprint store and try the Sanyo® 8100 one more time... But, so far, I like my decision... I'm thinking that if they come out with a decent Bluetooth phone in the next year, I might get that anyways.
Thanks for all your comments.
Bill
towermonkey said:Since when was the a400 a piece of junk? It sure performed better than its successor, the a460. I always liked the a400.
Jebus, ANYTHING would be better than that POS. The Sanyo handsets are, almost without exception, solid & take loads of abuse, not to mention hold signal like a junkie holds onto his last syringe. The 4900 was awesome, no reason to think the 4920 would not be any worse.
muchdrama said:towermonkey said:Since when was the a400 a piece of junk? It sure performed better than its successor, the a460. I always liked the a400.
Jebus, ANYTHING would be better than that POS. The Sanyo handsets are, almost without exception, solid & take loads of abuse, not to mention hold signal like a junkie holds onto his last syringe. The 4900 was awesome, no reason to think the 4920 would not be any worse.
Both were crappity crap crap, IMHO. The A460 WAS worse though. The A500 was a solid little phone.
towermonkey said:But that's just it, the a400 wasn't a piece of crap. It as a sturdy, rugged little phone that outperformed its...muchdrama said:towermonkey said:Since when was the a400 a piece of junk? It sure performed better than its successor, the a460. I always liked the a400.
Jebus, ANYTHING would be better than that POS. The Sanyo handsets are, almost without exception, solid & take loads of abuse, not to mention hold signal like a junkie holds onto his last syringe. The 4900 was awesome, no reason to think the 4920 would not be any worse.
Both were crappity crap crap, IMHO. The A460 WAS worse though. The A500 was a solid little phone.
(continues)
muchdrama said:...towermonkey said:But that's just it, the a400 wasn't a piece of crap. It as a sturdy, ruggemuchdrama said:towermonkey said:Since when was the a400 a piece of junk? It sure performed better than its successor, the a460. I always liked the a400.
Jebus, ANYTHING would be better than that POS. The Sanyo handsets are, almost without exception, solid & take loads of abuse, not to mention hold signal like a junkie holds onto his last syringe. The 4900 was awesome, no reason to think the 4920 would not be any worse.
Both were crappity crap crap, IMHO. The A460 WAS worse though. The A500 was a solid little phone.
(continues)
towermonkey said:...muchdrama said:towermonkey said:But that's just it, the a400 wasn'tmuchdrama said:towermonkey said:Since when was the a400 a piece of junk? It sure performed better than its successor, the a460. I always liked the a400.
Jebus, ANYTHING would be better than that POS. The Sanyo handsets are, almost without exception, solid & take loads of abuse, not to mention hold signal like a junkie holds onto his last syringe. The 4900 was awesome, no reason to think the 4920 would not be any worse.
Both were crappity crap crap, IMHO. The A460 WAS worse though. The A500 was a solid little phone.
(continues)