It seems as though AT&T is NOT a member of the Open Handset Alliance!. . .
My mothers line on my contract expires in April. I'll be paying very, very close attention to Google's Android and T-Mobile between now and April.
Whatever comments people may have about th...
(continues)
Secondly, I really, really believe Android is going to be a game changer when it comes to mobile operating systems, in a similar way Apple was a game changer when it comes to touch phones.
Google's Android is yet another thing that ATT will be ABSENT from, just as they are absent from the high-end camera phone market.
Oh my mistake, not only is ATT's failure to carry the N95-3 an indication that they refuse to participate in the high-end camera phone market, but ATT ALSO refused to carry the SE K850, another high-end camera phone.
The wireless indus...
(continues)
๐คฃ
AT&T has allowed activating any compatible unlocked phone on their system for quite some time. I fail to understand your issue. Belonging or not belonging to an alliance is not necessarily a sign of resistance to innovation.
AT&T's objection however is most likely their inability to lock down the OS and firmware under Android. That could translate into loss of service sales such as AT&T Navigator....and they don't want that. Afterall, its all about the greed.
YepYepYep said:
Good points. All eyes will be on the T-Mobile G1 to see how that works out, and, if T-Mobile can make money off of that. If not, the controlled OS & Apps method will prevail.
I could see T-Mobile here in the U.S. using Android to increase market share. They could promote themselves as the "free and open" GSM carrier that now has a 3G network that will continue to expand. From what I understand they have always had good customer service and rapport and are very flexible. Android could be a very good fit for them.
Thank you for not bashing me for my viewpoint, I really do believe Android has the potential to shake up the mobile operating systems in a similar way Apple was a game changer with touch phones, and it seems ATT will be adsent from this revolution called Android.
Press conference to announce the Dream G1 is at 10:30am eastern.
VOICE OF REASON said:
๐ Unless you've tried sprint in the last year or two, just stop...
Not that I'm surprised about your reaction, this is the at&t forum... ๐ Get over yourself....
In my house and around my neighborhood, youd be lucky to be able to make/receive calls with ANY gsm carrier.... Yet Sprint, Nextel, Uscc and Verizon work fine..... I left at&t for sprint because they provide better coverage in my area (Northern IL/Chicago/Wisconsin).
BTW tell your friend to try putting his phone to "sprint only" in the roaming options, then it will never roam.... Downtown where?
Jayshmay said:
I just hear a whole, whole, whole lot of bad things about their customer service, there must be a reason Sprint has lost what? At least 2 million customers in less than a year?
They'd be better if the customer service wasn't in India.
AT&T could've released the N95-3, but it would had been so expensive that it couldn't had competed with other real PDA phones with actual QWERTY keypads... (same goes for the K850i) great phones, but they don't meet what most customers want and that's smartphones with QWERTY keypads. It's my understanding that by the end of this year more than 50 percent of AT&T phones will be smartphones...
P.S. Have you thought about how much the N95 would've sucked if it had been released with all the AT&T crap on it?
Mobile Operators
China Mobile Communications Corporation
KDDI CORPORATION
NTT DoCoMo, Inc.
Sprint Nextel
T-Mobile
Telecom Italia
Telefรฦรยณnica
Semiconductor Companies
Audience
Broadcom
Intel Corporation
Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
NVIDIA Corporation
Qualcomm Inc.
SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc.
Synaptics, Inc.
Texas Instruments Incorporated
Handset Manufacturers
HTC Corporation
LG Electronics, Inc.
Motorola, Inc.
Samsung Electronics
Software Companies
Ascender Corp.
eBay Inc.
Esmertec
Google Inc.
LivingImage ...
(continues)
The issue with high end phones is that people want to get their phones for cheap. There is no conspiracy against high end camera phones. It's plain business. AT&T has to buy thousands of these, and offer them at a huge subsidy just to move the product. The end result could likely be a loss.
As others have pointed out, AT&T does not restrict the use...
(continues)