Mexican Regulators Approve AT&T's Iusacell Acquisition
Oh Gee, Can't monopolize in the US so lets change countries.
AT&T may be a welcome change to break up Telmex, if you really dislike Telmex, okay, awesome, fantastic, but AT&T wont bring anything new to the Mexican market, except maybe more expensive data plans, and high priced international USA/Mexico plans. On top of this, I am sure that AT&T USA and AT&T Mexico will both have different SIM cards, different locking policies, and one SIM card sold on one side of the border wont be compatible with a device sold on the other - meaning, you MUST buy a data plan from AT&T, or roam...
(continues)
ATT has no monopoly.
1: exclusive ownership through legal privilege, command of supply, or concerted action
2: exclusive possession or control
3: a commodity controlled by one party
4: one that has a monopoly
I've watched the 'monopoly whiners' on this board for years.
How in the world can ATT's mobile service be called a monoply when Verizon has more subscribers that ATT?
What they don't fully grasp is that both Verizon and AT&T having the most customers does not make them a monopoly where both compete in the same markets (in no market do they compete landline, but they do for mobile) but it makes them a duopoly, in that both control majority of all customers both landline and wireless, as well as have swapped spectrum from one to benefit the other (sometimes without any money exchanging hands), have colluded to not compete in select areas against each other, and in others, price fix themselves so even if you did want to leave one for another, the exact same thing you get on the oth...
(continues)
rwalford79 said:...
People seem to understand that in many areas AT&T is a monopoly, in others Verizon is, both in landline and/or mobile service.
What they don't fully grasp is that both Verizon and AT&T having the most customers does not make them a monopoly where both compete in the same markets (in no market do they compete landline, but they do for mobile) but it makes them a duopoly, in that both control majority of all customers both landline and wireless, as well as have swapped spectrum from one to benefit the other (sometimes without any money exchanging hands), have colluded to not compete in select areas against each other, and in others, price fix themselves so even if you did want to leave one for another, th
(continues)
Blow your own mind. You apparently love to exercise your already big piehole. 😉
rwalford79 said:...
People seem to understand that in many areas AT&T is a monopoly, in others Verizon is, both in landline and/or mobile service.
What they don't fully grasp is that both Verizon and AT&T having the most customers does not make them a monopoly where both compete in the same markets (in no market do they compete landline, but they do for mobile) but it makes them a duopoly, in that both control majority of all customers both landline and wireless, as well as have swapped spectrum from one to benefit the other (sometimes without any money exchanging hands), have colluded to not compete in select areas against each other, and in others, price fix themselves so even if you did want to leave one for anoth
(continues)
This forum is closed.