FCC Not Satisfied with Verizon's ETF Explanation
Dec 23, 2009, 10:36 PM by Eric M. Zeman
Mignon Clyburn, a member of the Federal Communications Commission, has called Verizon's official response to the FCC's query into the companies' recently revised early termination fees "unsatisfying" and "troubling." In November, Verizon Wireless doubled the ETFs for advanced devices from $175 to $350. Verizon explained that it loses money on customers who choose to break their contract as late as the 23rd month. It said the new ETFs offset the higher cost of the devices, and that it is being used to cover advertising and marketing costs associated with customer acquisition. "Consumers already pay high monthly fees for voice and data designed to cover the costs of doing business," Clyburn said. "It is hard for me to believe that the public interest is being well served." The FCC also points out that Verizon's explanation of erroneously charged data fees does not mesh with consumer complaints. The FCC plans to investigate the matter further when it reconvenes in 2010.
Comments
Oh Really?
(continues)
(continues)
(continues)
I work for VZW, here's how I see it
However, I see absolutely no problem with the ETF increase. Consider these points:
1. The ETF is completely optional. 100% not required. If you bring in your own phone or purchase one from us, you can activate month-to-month on postpaid pricing and won't EVER have to worry about paying a single dollar towards canceling early.
2. I'll also confirm what's been said several times: we pay close to full retail for each phone. Yes, there is SOME markup on the full retail price, but very very little. As has been stated in previous threads, the man...
(continues)
(continues)
qcjl84 said:...
First off, I completely agree regarding the $1.99/MB charges. While many of them are valid, more often than not they seem shady. When I worked in customer care I almost always credited them back.
However, I see abso
(continues)
(continues)
qcjl84 said:...
1. The ETF is completely optional. 100% not required. If you bring in your own phone or purchase one from us, you can activate month-to-month on postpaid pricing and won't EVER have to worry about paying a single dolla
(continues)
When a carrier, any carrier, purchases phones in bulk from a manufacturer the carrier gets a discount or subsidy on the per-unit price. The "full retail" price asked by the carrier is higher than what ...
(continues)
(continues)
Allow me to elaborate…
While yes the ETF is explained in the...
(continues)
qcjl84 said:...
2. I'll also confirm what's been said several times: we pay close to full retail for each phone. Yes, there is SOME markup on the full retail price, but very very little. As has been stated in previous threads, the m
(continues)
T-MO has it right.
Note that this is NOT prepaid. You get the exact same pricing ...
(continues)
Hopeful
FCC needs to stay out of business
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON FOR THE FCC TO BE GETTING INVOLVED IN PRIVATE BUSINESS.
No one is forcing people to sign a contract with a $350 etf, they can sign with another carrier or they can pay retail and not sign a contract at all.
Celling_it said:...
This is a free market economy and that means that companies can charge what they feel is fair and consumers can buy what they want to buy.
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON FOR THE FCC TO BE GETTING INVOLVED IN PRIV
(continues)
(continues)
(continues)
Celling_it said:...
This is a free market economy and that means that companies can charge what they feel is fair and consumers can buy what they want to buy.
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON FOR THE FCC TO BE GETTING INVOLVED IN PRIV
(continues)
I'm not sure if this has been explained properly...
The raise in the ETF from $175 to $350 came shortly after the launch of the Moto Droid. Why? Say you aren't eligible to upgrade. You want a new Droid. If you were to add a new line to your existing account, buy a Droid at the discounted price ($199.99 after rebate) for the new phone line, then move the Droid over to your pre-existing phone number, then turn around and cancel the new line you just added after 31 days, you end up getting a Droid for $374.99 ($199.99 + $175 ETF), while if you w...
(continues)
make the ETF the difference of the subsidized price.
The *ACTUAL STORY* behind Verizon's higher ETF's.... For those who think you can just pay full price
Back in the day, handsets were only subsidized by roughly $150.00 / $175.00 , but in order to compete with AT&T, Verizon Wireless is subsidizing handsets upwards of $300.00 in order to remain competitive.
If you were to purchase a handset at full price on Verizon's network such as the Motorola Droid, you would effectiv...
(continues)
And try buying a new Bold without a contract (paying retail) it's not cheap either.
If you had any sense of histor...
(continues)
(continues)
(continues)
bluecoyote said:...
The doubling of Verizon Wireless's ETF is due to Verizon Wireless doubling their device subsidies. The hardware cost of the Motorola Droid, for example, is some $400.00 HIGHER than the cost with contract. Verizon W
(continues)
Prepaid it's not just for the credit challenged anymore.
(continues)
http://www.pagepluscellular.com/Plans.aspx »
AT&T is going to do the SAME thing
You don't think they are keenly aware that the iPhone scam can be halted with one quick move?
The only reason they did not immediately follow suit is to wait and see what the FCC might do. Once the FCC shows they legally cannot do anything about VZW legitimately raising their fees to reflect actual subsidies AT&T will do the same on the iPhone.
It doesn't. the NYC area is an area with poor call quality DUE to the iphone so it seems to me that they're trying to cut it down a bit in order to give them a chance to correct the issue. ...
(continues)
The ETF is there for a good reason
(continues)
- Our data is still faster than you, Our plans are better than yours, were cheaper then you. Your ETF reasoning is crap and VZW is a...
(continues)
phoneman29 said:
Fact, we offer far more better service than anyone in the wireless industry and this does come at a huge expense.
Your fact is fiction.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/business/13digi.html »...
(continues)
verizon is lame!!!
Is it $350 per line even on business account????
Missing the point.
(continues)
Verizon is strong arming anyone, if you allow it.
For those who said to un-regulate things, we did that with Wall Street and look at the mess we are in.. Corruption, munipilation, and the top 1% gets richer. If Verizon got their way you won't be able to use future data, or wireless service without hefty fees or restrictions.
we gave a TON of money to government run loan companies, signed LAWS making it harder to deny loans to people with poor credit, and then told these investment firms that they were "too big to fail." aka, all risk...
(continues)
Over 125 responses...............
From the very start of the cellphone industry and until the very end there will be practices that will not please anyone....period 😉
Don't want a contract? Fine! Again, you have choices people. You can ...
(continues)
The FCC makes a great point.....
Check out overage charges especially - depending on the plan and carrier, overage charges have usually ranged in price. Trust me, these are little profit centers for the carriers. Those per minute service charges don't cost them diddly, and they're charging as much as $.45 a minute for them.
It's nice to see the FCC finally looking out for the interests of consumers, rather than their big business golfing buddies.
I guess the fcc should look and see what most consumers have said about it i don't think it has stopped many from buying. It would not stop me I have no intention of cl...
(continues)
It's about damn time
Good luck.
Question of the year.....
to paraphrase, if vzw loses money when a customer cancels in the 23rd month, how do they make money when a customer upgrades to another device in the 23rd month or before? Vzw's argument makes no sense at all......
To rephrase.....if Verizon doesn't make m...
(continues)
(continues)
Which is faster...
Help me understand
So the question she be pointing to AT&T for there prices
(continues)