Verizon Version of Samsung Femtocell Passes Through FCC
Nov 5, 2008, 10:55 AM by Eric M. Zeman
The FCC has approved a new version of the Samsung Ubicell product with Verizon branding on it. This suggests that Verizon will follow Sprint's lead and offer a femotcell to customers seeking better reception in their homes.
Samsung Refreshes Galaxy S Series with S Pen, New Cameras
Samsung Refines its Foldable Phones
iPhone 14 Plus Offers a Big Screen For Less
Google Adds COVID Cards to Android Wallet
Samsung Brings Galaxy XCover6 Pro to US Businesses
Comments
And of course, do it better in the process 🤣
...
JesusSaves said:
FOLLOW SPRINTS LEAD 🤣
Well I guess Sprint was following Tmobile's lead since they were the first to offer a similiar service. Also, tmobile service is better than what sprint and verizon will b...
(continues)
I Remember...
I Remember when the Airave was first announced by Sprint, and all the Verizon fanboys were screaming about how "you wouldn't need a device like that if you had a superior network with better signal".
😳 😳 Where are those fanboys now? 😁 😁
Probably looking forward to having better signal in their house, just like the Sprint peeps...
😳 😳 Where are those fanboys now? 😁 😁
Probably looking forward to having better signal in their house, just like the Sprint peeps...
Verizon fanbois are doped up about they're carrier, and aren't in touch with reality, and they're brainwashed by those "network" advertisements!!!!
AT&T has worked just fine for me for 7yrs now. From now on I'm calling Verizon fanboys Verizon crack...
(continues)
AT&T has worked just fine for me for 7yrs now. From now on I'm calling Verizon fanboys Verizon crack...
(continues)
...
Right here.
and its for area of location where towers are not around.
like at my grandparents lake house, theres a huge clif behind em, then the lake with Alabama on the other side. Verizon gets one bar, and its EVDO. No one els does. What you c...
(continues)
and its for area of location where towers are not around.
like at my grandparents lake house, theres a huge clif behind em, then the lake with Alabama on the other side. Verizon gets one bar, and its EVDO. No one els does. What you c...
(continues)
...
I'm torn - Like the coverage increase, but like TMobile's better
I'm torn -
On the one hand, I'd really like to see this kind of thing because it seems like no matter where I move to I have borderline Verizon coverage. This would be great for that.
On the other hand, conceptually I liked TMobile's version, where you can use any wireless internet connection, better. It's nice to be able to go over to a friends house where coverage is limited and have my phone work 100% there, to.
On the one hand, I'd really like to see this kind of thing because it seems like no matter where I move to I have borderline Verizon coverage. This would be great for that.
On the other hand, conceptually I liked TMobile's version, where you can use any wireless internet connection, better. It's nice to be able to go over to a friends house where coverage is limited and have my phone work 100% there, to.
Yeah, t-mobile's version is pretty sweet. Do you have to put in the info for the router to use the wi-fi or it just automatically picks it up? How many t-mobile phones can actually use this feature?
...
Enough bash talk... this is a good thing...
I liked the idea of Cellular expansion via VoIP. It's a good thing Verizon is bringing it in. After all, there are some areas that no cellular service covers well.
This is where having the VoIP/Cellular router helps out, for any carrier. You can't have perfect coverage everywhere, as you would have a tower every square mile, which is a logistics nightmare, not to mention a significant drain on the power grid, when you multiply the number of cells by 5 or more to factor in all the carriers.
Please, quit the VZW/everyone else bashing, and embrace the (not really) new technology.
This is where having the VoIP/Cellular router helps out, for any carrier. You can't have perfect coverage everywhere, as you would have a tower every square mile, which is a logistics nightmare, not to mention a significant drain on the power grid, when you multiply the number of cells by 5 or more to factor in all the carriers.
Please, quit the VZW/everyone else bashing, and embrace the (not really) new technology.
This is a great thing. All marketing bull crap out of the way, no carrier has perfect or even great service on their own. All this can do is make the cell phone industry even better.
