Sprint Found In Violation of Prism Patents
Jun 30, 2015, 3:17 PM by Eric M. Zeman
Sprint was found culpable of infringing on two patents held by Prism Technologies. The patents in question pertain to accessing protected computer resources and were used by Sprint in its "Simply Everything" and "Everything Data" plans, according to Prism. Sprint was ordered to pay a fine of $30 million. Sprint rejects the decision and said it will appeal. "We believe the evidence is clear that Sprint does not infringe the patent. Sprint plans to pursue post-trial motions," said Roni Singleton, a spokeswoman for Sprint, in a statement provided to RCR Wireless. Prism has similar cases pending against T-Mobile, Verizon Wireless, and U.S. Cellular.
Feb 9, 2022
Samsung today announced its lineup of flagship phones for 2022: the Galaxy S22 series. The top-end S22 Ultra sees the biggest changes as it essentially absorbs Samsung's Note series with an integrated S Pen stylus and a more Note-like shape and design, instead of the Contour Cut design of the other models.
Sep 7, 2022
Apple has revealed the iPhone 14 series, with new features, improved specs, and new size options. In place of a Mini option, the iPhone 14 will come in the same 6.1-inch and 6.7-inch screen size options as the Pro models.
Mar 23, 2021
OnePlus today announced the OnePlus 9 and OnePlus 9 Pro, its newest flagship phones. The 9 Pro is a true flagship-class phone with a QHD AMOLED display with variable refresh from 1 to 120 Hz, and IP68 water rating, starting at $969.
Jan 14, 2021
Samsung today officially unveiled its Galaxy S21 series of flagship phones for 2021. All three models sport a distinctive new "Contour Cut Camera" design where the metal frame extends around one corner to surround the rear cameras.
Am I the only one that bothers to actually read patents?
"Method of and device for attracting aquatic life forms using bubble and sound formation in an aquatic environment"?
I knew something was slowing down their network, its underwater battery powered bubble makers. I'll leave the relative stupidity of that patent out of this, but everyone is using this patent number in articles everywhere.
Its obviously not the right one, since the troll's, I mean Plaintiffs other "patent" 8,127,345 is a total BS drown-the-approver-with-seventy-pages-of-high ly-technical-reference for a non-innovative non-unique way of logging into a secured system through a network.
But some companies rolled over and ponied up the extortion money, so now everyone has to, or...