Home › News ›

NJ Says Cops Need Warrants to Track Cell Phones

Jul 19, 2013, 10:35 AM by Eric M. Zeman

The New Jersey State Supreme Court handed citizens of The Garden State a victory against the tracking efforts of law enforcement on Thursday. The court ruled that police must first obtain a warrant before tracking suspects' cell phones. The ruling is one of the first such in the country and may set the tone for similar cases around the country. The decision was the result of an appeal made by Thomas Earls, who was arrested on burglary charges in 2006. Earls contended that law enforcement tracked his location via cell phone without obtaining a warrant and in so doing violated his state-protected privacy rights. New Jersey's state constitution contains stricter privacy safeguards than even the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment. "Cell phones are not meant to serve as tracking devices to locate their owners wherever they may be," wrote Chief Justice Stuart Rabner of the decision. "People buy cell phones to communicate with others, to use the internet, and for a growing number of other reasons. But no one buys a cell phone to share detailed information about their whereabouts with the police."

NJ.com »

Related

Google Pixel 6 Pro is Google's "First Flagship" Phone

Oct 19, 2021
Google released details of the new Pixel 6 series phones that the company has been teasing for months. The Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro are both high-end phones with a striking new two-tone design and the company's own Tensor chip instead of a Qualcomm Snapdragon chip.

FCC Proposes Stricter Deadline on Tech to Fight Illegal Robocalls

May 20, 2021
The FCC today formally proposed moving up the deadline for smaller companies to implement STIR/SHAKEN technology by one year. This technology makes number spoofing difficult, allowing law enforcement and voice service providers to identify and block bad actors.

New Senate Bill Would Reshape App Stores

Aug 12, 2021
A bipartisan group of three US Senators has introduced new legislation that would place major new rules on the app stores run by Apple and Google. The Open App Markets Act would: Ensure users could access third-party app stores and make them the default.

Google Making Maps Location History Private, Even from Police

Dec 15, 2023
Google is changing how Maps stores your location history, moving it on-device by default and encrypting it when saved to the cloud. This change means even Google can't access that data, which also means Google will no longer be able to respond to "geo-fence" warrants from police wanting to know who was in a given area at a given time.

South Korea Passes Major New Law Targeting In-App Purchases

Aug 31, 2021
South Korea's National Assembly has passed a new law that will require Apple and Google to open up in-app purchases to third-party payments. Apple and Google currently require the use their own payment systems for in-app purchases, from which the companies extract a cut of up to 30%.

Comments

This forum is closed.

This forum is closed.

dalius_maximus

Jul 19, 2013, 11:35 AM

I wonder...

I wonder what he will receive as compensation. I wouldn't be surprised if he gets half the appropriate penalty just because of this... Certainly a little compensation for the breach may be in order, but I bet he gets way more than he deserves. Reminds me of a case I read about once where an individual was robbing a home and got locked in the garage somehow whilst trying to escape. He was trapped there for 6 days, until the family arrived home from vacation. He survived on a case of mountain dews and some dog food that was left in the garage. The family pressed charges for burglary, he counter sued for cruel and unusual punishment for his entrapment. He won and then family had to confer a large sum. I think he still spent a little time in pri...
(continues)

msteven3

Most likely, any evidence gathered as a result of the tracking will be thrown out, and a new trial will be ordered. At that point, the DA will decide if the evidence that's left will be enough to get a conviction, and he or she will decide whether to...
(continues)

Page 1 of 1