Phone Scoop

printed August 25, 2016
See this page online at:
http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/p_forum.php?ff=3824

Home  ›  Phones  ›  Motorola  ›

Motorola Atrix HD

 

Info Photos Reviews  5 News Forum  

You must log in to post.

dougm

Feb 12, 2014, 11:18 PM

KitKat / 4.4.2

Am having lots of problems obtaining an LTE signal on 4.1. Battery life also drains very quickly to 1%, then stays at 1% for up to a couple hours. Anyone know if and when this device is slated to receive KitKat?
1 reply
johnhr2

May 12, 2013, 3:08 PM
over in the "FCC Outs Mystery Motorola Handset for AT&T" discussion:

If this is the rumor Motorola/Google X Phone.

I would buy this phone if:

1) It had a removable battery

2) It kept the Kevlar backing (more for personal reason)

3) Especially if it got regular updates, especially since its rumored to be stock updates (Nexus-like), I'd take a month delay simply because that would be better than what is happening now
3 replies
wicked39180

Dec 14, 2012, 10:47 AM
over in the "Motorola Atrix HD Updated to Jelly Bean by AT&T" discussion:

4.1 update

been checking system updates for about a hour now still nothing Evil or Very Mad
2 replies
keithfrombm

Dec 14, 2012, 1:29 PM
over in the "Motorola Atrix HD Updated to Jelly Bean by AT&T" discussion:

I should've gotten it instead

instead of the increasingly disappointing HTC One X
bobc74

Oct 20, 2012, 4:00 PM
over in the "Motorola Talks Jelly Bean Updates for Its U.S. Devices" discussion:

Motorola also

originally promised ICS updates for some devices like the original Photon, and then later said no. Don't believe it until it actually happens folks.
3 replies

AD       discussions continues below...

tschlicht

Jul 25, 2012, 3:15 PM

Camera Quality, what's wrong?

I keep reading that the camera isn't that great, but no details as to why. Is it picture quality, the application that is used to take the pictures??? Can anyone who has the phone, or tested it in person, tell me what the "Issue" with the camera is?
1 reply
Pilgrim7

Jul 23, 2012, 9:17 PM
over in the "Review: Motorola Atrix HD for AT&T" discussion:

Dream Theater FTW!

You went to 'A Dramatic Tour of Events'! Cool
I am anxiously waiting for the concert on August 10Th (South American Tour).
Nice review, but I would get the Nexus! (though I am an iPhone user) Very Happy
MOKLA40

Jul 15, 2012, 2:20 PM

Speakphone- Half Dulpex?

Sad

Really???
5 replies
Rich Brome

Jul 12, 2012, 3:22 PM

no Lapdock / Webtop

Unfortunately, we've rec'd confirmation from Motorola that the Atrix HD does not include the Webtop software and therefore won't work with the Lapdock accessories. It's a price issue; it's one way they got the price down to $99 (on contract.)

It's still a very high-spec consumer device, but for those looking for that particular business feature, the Atrix 2 might be a better choice.
2 replies
TH3ORY

Jul 21, 2012, 7:59 PM
over in the "Review: Motorola Atrix HD for AT&T" discussion:

Motorola Atrix HD for AT&T

Thats one ugly looking phone Motorola really need to get a new product designer seriously...
tschlicht

Jul 17, 2012, 10:46 AM

Atrix HD for $49.99

If you want this phone I see it's only $49.99 at Best Buy.
40oz_Warrior

Jul 16, 2012, 8:35 AM

Unfortunate Trends

Another phone with a sealed-in battery ?. Ugh.
And what's up with deleting the Webtop just to make a $99 price point ? That was just software, unless Motorola has to pay someone royalties for it. The prior Atrix's were typically offered for $49 and sometimes $0.
Both the battery situation and lack of Webtop support on this phone are deal breakers for me.
I own an Atrix 2 and love it, but I guess if I had to upgrade right now I'd be ditching Motorola for a Samsung Galaxy S III.
2 replies
bluecoyote

Jul 12, 2012, 6:35 PM
over in the "Motorola Atrix HD Doesn't Support WebTop or Lapdock" discussion:

Did anyone actually buy these, and if so, why?

Why did anyone buy these? I get it, the idea is very cool, but also cool: a sustainable product and accessories roadmap that doesn't leave a $500.00 accessory obsolete when you change models of your phone.

Does anyone, ever think Motorola has *ever* enough foresight to work this kind of long-term platform?
2 replies
Jaywireless

Jul 12, 2012, 2:24 PM

atrix hd launch

anyone have
any other specs for this phone other then on this page
3 replies
tschlicht

Jul 12, 2012, 4:04 PM
over in the "Motorola Atrix HD Doesn't Support WebTop or Lapdock" discussion:

scree mirroring?

No WebTop isn't a big deal. But does this also mean that you can hook up an HDMI cable and mirror the screen without a stupid media dock???
3 replies
Vmac39

Jul 12, 2012, 4:09 PM
over in the "Motorola Atrix HD Doesn't Support WebTop or Lapdock" discussion:

Certain Phones, Really?

When the Atrix first launched, I don't recall any Motorola phones that could use the lapdock. At least, they never advertised it. Besides, for those who spent the $400 for the phone and dock combo, do any of the newer Moto phones work for it? Just seems like a waste of customers money to me if it doesn't.
stevoe101

Jul 10, 2012, 8:40 PM

Flash support

Im assumng this motorola doesnt have flash? anyone have any idea? I saw HTML 5,
1 reply
Tofuchong

Jul 10, 2012, 3:29 PM
over in the "Motorola Officially Introduces the Atrix HD for AT&T" discussion:

Keep it in your inner left jacket pocket

Never know when a Ninja is going to throw a shuriken at you.
2 replies
Tofuchong

Jul 5, 2012, 1:14 PM
over in the "Motorola Outs the Kevlar-Lined Atrix HD with 4.5-Inch Display" discussion:

Kevlar is a Gimmick

Everybody hears kevlar, and they instantly think MY PHONE IS BULLETPROOF OMG!!!

wrong.

Kevlar used to mean something, these days, when I hear it being included in the linkes of Cellular phones, thats just ridiculous.

I don't see Sonim advertising they put kevlar in any of their phones, but I bet just about any Sonim phone is tougher than this one is.
6 replies
tschlicht

Jul 5, 2012, 10:17 AM
over in the "Motorola Outs the Kevlar-Lined Atrix HD with 4.5-Inch Display" discussion:

Hit or miss?

Size looks good, not too big like the S III might be. The only thing that has me worried is the battery and the fact you still need a media dock to see the display on the TV. Hopefully I've just miss understood that and it won't HAVE to have the dock.
1 reply
 
 
Page  1  of 1

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Twitter Phone Scoop on Facebook Subscribe to Phone Scoop on YouTube Follow on Instagram

 

All content Copyright 2001-2016 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.
1