I have never had an LG phone , can anyone tell me how it compares to the nokias? as in reception wise? is it as good quality? The nokias that I have had always pick up good, but Im starting to like the features on the LG's any opinions? thanks
Nokia is a better overall product than Nokia. Nokia has better reception, better battery life, better quality, etc. The LG F9100 was okay but a much better product than the other LG phones. I haven't used the F9200, but I do know that the other LG's that are currently listed on the Cingular website are terrible phones as far as reception and there's a lot of complaints about the reception.
I'll echo phillyslickset's comments on the solid quality of Nokia phones. It you want a reliable phone that packs good battery life and great reception, go with Nokia. I have have owned both Nokia and LG phones. I like both, but given the choice between the two (with equivalent features) I would go with Nokia. LG tends to package more features in their phones, but it just doesn't have that polished feel that Nokia tends to have. I haven't experienced terrible battery and reception problems with LG. It wasn't great, but it wasn't terrible either. However, if you are specifically interested in the LG F9200, I wouldn't be too concerned about these issues since this phone is based off of an older model (aka, they learned from their mistakes and ... (continues)