Motorola V710
Class Action
The V710 is advertised and packaged as having "Bluetooth," but wireless communication without OBEX is not the full Bluetooth protocol specification.
3 or more consumers = class action. Any takers?
Saying features are network-dependant does not cover themselves for advertising features that are not available in -any- network.
Maybe you should sue your law school for malpractice.
I was under the impression that people are extremely disappointed with the lack of Bluetooth functionality. If I'm wrong, please correct me.
If I'm correct, then folks should make themselves heard, and maybe Verizon Wireless will change their policy as they indicated was possible in the NYT article. If VZW are unwilling to do this, then legal action is an appropriate avenue to either get the functionality or change the advertising.
And on that note đ Has anyone gotten MP3 ringtones to work? Everytime I load one, it simply blips and wont play. WTF?
-PCWOOD
http://qualweb.bluetooth.org/ »
In short, you will be laughed out of court.
I have been a loyal customer for almost 9 years and I am extremely aggrivated that they limit the phone as well as their service. Items like Get-It-Now, making you buy their ringer's is BS!
frank_the_tank said:
By showing the Bluetooth logo the phone must pass certification. So it is clearly a Bluetooth enabled phone. Second, nowhere in any Bluetooth document does it say in order to be called Bluetooth it must have the OBEX profile. Don't belive me, check out the qualification process. It can be qualified for one of dozens of possible Bluetooth profiles.
http://qualweb.bluetooth.org/ »
In short, you will be laughed out of court.
Bluetooth is a short range wireless networking technology that uses the same frequency band (2.4 GHz) as 802.11b wireless networks.
Imagine buying a 802.11b wireless notebook computer and taking it home with you, only to learn that it could not transfer files ...
(continues)
I personally couldn't give two hoots about ringtones, but would really love my (expensive) little phone to join the 21st century and be able to sync contacts with my laptop or send images to the computer as implied by the advertised Bluetooth capability.
Verizon said it limited the Bluetooth functionality to protect security agreements with its Get It Now partners. It promises a software upgrade in the future but only for address book syncing.
I hope the update comes and it doesn't mess with the T-Flash.
They need to allow us to send our photo's to out Blue toothe enabled PC or PDA Without them getting money for it.
That is WRONG!
American User said:
Verizon is GREEDY.
They need to allow us to send our photo's to out Blue toothe enabled PC or PDA Without them getting money for it.
That is WRONG!
"Greedy" is what the market will bear.
Apparently not enough customers care about BT crippling (at least not enough YET) to cause VZW to announce action, BUT it seems they are working on something, so it seems to me the "raised voices" have been heard.
Perhaps "patience" should be the watchword rather than "lawsuit".
American User said:
Verizon is GREEDY.
They need to allow us to send our photo's to out Blue toothe enabled PC or PDA Without them getting money for it.
That is WRONG!
Please explain, using diagrams where appropriate, why sending photos via Bluetooth without being compensated for it is greedy. Furthermore, please provide, with reference to laws currently on the book, how this is illegal. Laws that "Should be" on the book are not included here. "Anti-trust" and the "AT&T Settlement" are also not to be included unless you actually understand what they mean. Finally, explain why you didn't return your phone to Verizon within the 15 day waiting period, with the option of returning to pick up the v710...
(continues)
(continues)
'The Motorola V710 is a phone and a whole lot more. Featuring an integrated 1.2 megapixel camera, video capture, playback and messaging to any email address, and Mobile Web 2.0, it's a phone that is designed for the way you live. And with Bluetooth wireless technology, you can make hands-free, eyes-free calls, and connect to your PC or PDA whenever and wherever you want.'
pay attention to the last sentence. Tha...
(continues)
QuasiMoto said:
People and this society are too litigous, so drop discussion of a class action suit. Why can't you folks take ownership of your own actions and just return the phone if you are that unhappy (Verizon would probable take it back if you are all that unhappy)....this is not life and death and you are talking about a couple hundred bucks or less. Give it a break. The threshhold for lawsuits should be much higher than this type of petty stuff.
Well said. I guess I can add my 2 cents to this. Your under contract for your min allowances, not the features of the phone. Verizon has given the option of many phones, and you chose that phone. Verizon (from my understanding) has not guarenteed any fea...
(continues)
'And with Bluetooth wireless technology, you can make hands-free, eyes-free calls, and connect to your PC or PDA whenever and wherever you want.'
From the multiple reviews I have read, you cannot connect the phone 'hands free' to your PC or PDA via bluetooth. You supposedly have to buy the data cable which verizon doesnt even offer in their online store--that is according to Motorola. Also, the Ad for the phone is blat...
(continues)
(it appears as if youve just prolonged the conversation)
I agree that americans sue too much over frivolous things, however I'd like to point out in the phone description on verizon's website that there is nothing about the phone that indicates that you have to pay to transfer pictures and mp3's for ringtones to your phone. Further, according to this statement on the site: but has verizon said it woule give it to you free? You assume that it would be free from motorola. The vzw site says supported optional feaures get it now..
'And with Bluetooth wireless technology, you can make hands-free, eyes-free calls, and connect to your PC or PDA whenever and wherever you want.'
From the multiple reviews I have read, you cannot connect the phone 'hands free' to your...
(continues)
nathanjax said:...
nathanjax said:
but has verizon said it woule give it to you free? You assume that it would be free from motorola. The vzw site says supported optional feaures get it now..
My point here is that Verizon is being misleading and not telling the consumer that the bluetooth is crippled due to get it now. Nowhere in the description of the phone does it say that, nor anywhere else on the site--and I have spent sometime looking for it. According to the phone description, you supposedly get all those features--which is obviously not the case. Also, the description of the phone indicates that the features it lists are fully functional--so technically you are paying for them when you purchase
(continues)
'And with Bluetooth wireless technology, you can make hands-free, eyes-free calls, and connect to your PC or PDA whenever and wherever you want.'
You can actually do all of these things. This statement does not imply that you can sync your contacts and calender, etc. between phone and computer/PDA via BT.
I use my v710 with both my PDA and my laptop PC. I "connect to" these to allow me to surf the internet via a wireless connection in remote locations.
There may be other places where they are misleading people, but I disagree with what you are saying here - from both a personal and legal perspecive.
QuasiMoto said:
People and this society are too litigous, so drop discussion of a class action suit. Why can't you folks take ownership of your own actions and just return the phone if you are that unhappy (Verizon would probable take it back if you are all that unhappy)....this is not life and death and you are talking about a couple hundred bucks or less. Give it a break. The threshhold for lawsuits should be much higher than this type of petty stuff.
In this society, we don't take people out back and pump two in the back of their heads - we don't gather the people responsible and hang them from a rope on the nearest tree -
We bring suit against them. That's the way things are done in America.
...
(continues)
CatInFL said:...
In this society, we don't take people out back and pump two in the back of their heads - we don't gather the people responsible and hang them from a rope on the nearest tree -
We bring suit against them. That's the way things are done in America.
I'm all for a class action suit against Verizon. The best evidence for such a suit can be found on the nuclear elephant page:
http://www.nuclearelephant.com/papers/v710.html »
It's high time somebody brought up this idea. Sadly - companies like Verizon don't respond to customer complaints - maybe they'll respond if it looks like they are going to see money coming out of their pocket.
What exactly do you propose and how should we contact you to get th
(continues)
Last weeek I spent an hour just raising wholy hell, getting names and phone numbers of who is responsible for this mess.
The $400 phone is not the total issue, I have a $40,000 car that can not function in it's safest capacity, due to Verizon.
My BMW, purchased in August, came with the integrated Bluetooth kit, and all I can do is "HOPE" that Verizon is going to fix this issue.
For now, hope is the only practical option, since the store manager said they WOULD fix the problem, just not saying WHEN.
Poser said:
I am in a similar situation and I have investigated the possibility of a class action lawsuit. Are you attempting to use the phone with a BMW? If so, it does not work. I appreciate your response.
Yes.
Verizon is denying me from integrating my phone into my Bluetooth car, and causing irrepairable and reckless endangerment, while they play games holding back technology that Motorola has already developed into the Bluetooth handsets.
I purchased my car and phone together in the same month. Now I feel that I have been deceived, and left with very few choices.
~Jake
PHANTOM_LORD said:
EXACTLY!!!! That is why I chose the Audiovox CDM-9900 and paid $49, no wait sorry, I got mine for free!!!!!!! with my $100 every 2. Can't beat that deal! Verizon cripples blue-tooth and there is nothing crippled on the CDM-9900.
This phone does not have Bluetooth, though.
Which Verizon phone do you get if you need Bluetooth to integrate with your car?
Let me know your experience and whether you would be interested in a class action suit.
Poser said:
I agree because I attempted to use it with my BMW and it was a no go. I also investigated the likelyhood of a firmware update from Motorola and was told last month that none was being offered by Verizon. When I asked to have the phone replaced with a different phone (since bluetooth was nonfunctional) Verizon refused. So I left Verizon and went to Cingular and bought the Razor which works without any problems from day one.
Let me know your experience and whether you would be interested in a class action suit.
Similar situation. Leaving Verizon was not an option because we have several phones contracted under the same plan.
The cost of replacing all of the handsets and / or paying mobile-...
(continues)
What can i do to help???
also after i got my 5 dollars and you got you couple of hundred thou motorola would just recoup the cost by raising the price of the next phone i want 10 dollars so the 5 i got from you would just cover half of the increase and the other half i have to pay reall would just go to you.
so tell me this why don't you start a thread asking all the users here to send you 5 bucks at least it would be an ho...
(continues)
(continues)
The things you think are problems are their doing. They want them that way. They don't feel they are problems. therefore easily fixed or not you most likely won't see a compleatly functional bluetooth phone from verizon weather you want it or not.
THEY DON'T THINK THESE ISSUES ARE PROBLEMS -- TO THEM THE PHONE IS FUNCTIONING IN THE WAY IT SHOULD -- LIKE THEY INTENDED -- SO THEY CAN GIVE A RATS BUTT ABOUT WHAT YOU WANT OR I WANT OR ALL OF US HERE OR ON HOFOF WANT YOU SEE WE ARE A SMAL...
(continues)
(continues)
(continues)
spiff said:
cool me too
Yeah, cool me too !
I agree with the users of this forum, that we really don't need to turn this into a "Verizon vs. the World" issue about Bluetooth.
A Class Action Lawsuit would probably get some of us a free headset (or something) in a few years and not much more. The lawyers would probably get hundreds of thousands of dollars and who knows what Verizon would be put through, whether they win or not.
To me it is amazing that VZW can't simply post a FAQ about whether the Bluetooth issues will be resolved, specifically what will be restored and when.
The advances in technology have been great for all of us. I love my V710 for all of the right reasons and I think Veriz...
(continues)
Just my $.02 worth.
Call Laura DiGirolamo
Kirtland and Packard, (310) 536-1000, 2361 Rosecrans Ave Ste 450, El Segundo, CA 90245
If you live in California and would be willing to give testimony, it will happer quicker. I live in NJ.
Let's get what we bought.
I only signed one year contract and that was almost 5 months ago... so in 7 months... I'm free with no penalty to pay!!!!
I've been with VZW for a long time but what they have done to this phone and their general lack of customer service has me convinced to take my bushiness elsewhere.
By the time I am with Cingular with my new Razor or maybe MPx.... your lawsuit will not have even gotten off the ground very well.
I wish you good luck with though because it is my opion that a company does not have a right to cripple the functions of the phone to force you to use their network to transfer data to a phone that h...
(continues)
There's more here, but it's in *everybody's* best interest if I keep my m...
(continues)
wirehead said:
She has no problems with me posting her email address (lmd@KirtlandPackard.com) and invites people with new and useful information to email her -- but please don't waste her time. Also, for a variety of reasons, it's much more useful to her if you are a Californian.
There's more here, but it's in *everybody's* best interest if I keep my mouth shut and stay vauge. However, you'll have to trust us that things are in motion.
I agree. Email her if you are a Californian and let's just sit back and see what happens.
cp_lawyer said:
I propose class action litigation against Verizon Wireless for false advertising and failure to deliver product as advertised with respect to the incomplete implementation of the Bluetooth specification.
The V710 is advertised and packaged as having "Bluetooth," but wireless communication without OBEX is not the full Bluetooth protocol specification.
3 or more consumers = class action. Any takers?
The suit was filed last Thursday.
http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?s=&postid ... »
You should email the attorneys if you live in California, according to the post.