Phone Scoop

printed July 3, 2015
See this page online at:

Home  ›  Phones  ›  Pantech  ›

Pantech C3b


Info Photos Reviews  7 News Forum  

Back to message list

Replying to:  Shouldn't this be just tagged on to the C3? by AshDizzle   May 23, 2007, 9:56 PM

Re: Shouldn't this be just tagged on to the C3?

by Rich Brome (Moderator)    May 23, 2007, 10:15 PM

It's a fine line with a difference like this. We try to be consistent, but there is a small gray area where we could go either way.

In this case, I felt Bluetooth was a major enough feature to warrant a separate entry. If someone does a Phone Finder search for phones with Bluetooth, they should get the C3b but not the C3 / C300.

Plus, we already combined the C300 and C3, which had the feature difference of changeable faceplates. The difference between the C300 and C3b was therefore multiple features, hence the definite need for a separate entry.

The external display on the ic502 is a less important feature than Bluetooth, IMO, so I ended up deciding to do one entry. However, that is an example of one where I could have gone either way.

Report to moderator


Reply You must log in to reply.

Back to message list

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Twitter Phone Scoop on Facebook Subscribe to Phone Scoop on YouTube Follow on Instagram


All content Copyright 2001-2015 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.