Phone Scoop

printed May 19, 2013
See this page online at:
http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/p_forum.php?fm=m&ff=1229&fi=1180659

sponsored
Home  ›  Phones  ›  Pantech  ›

Pantech C3b

 

Info Reviews  7 Shop News Forum

Back to message list

Replying to:  Shouldn't this be just tagged on to the C3? by AshDizzle   May 23, 2007, 9:56 PM

Re: Shouldn't this be just tagged on to the C3?

by Rich Brome (Moderator)    May 23, 2007, 10:15 PM

It's a fine line with a difference like this. We try to be consistent, but there is a small gray area where we could go either way.

In this case, I felt Bluetooth was a major enough feature to warrant a separate entry. If someone does a Phone Finder search for phones with Bluetooth, they should get the C3b but not the C3 / C300.

Plus, we already combined the C300 and C3, which had the feature difference of changeable faceplates. The difference between the C300 and C3b was therefore multiple features, hence the definite need for a separate entry.

The external display on the ic502 is a less important feature than Bluetooth, IMO, so I ended up deciding to do one entry. However, that is an example of one where I could have gone either way.

Report to moderator

Replies


Reply You must log in to reply.

Back to message list

Shop for accessories specifically compatible with the Pantech C3b.

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Twitter Phone Scoop on Facebook Phone Scoop on Google+ Subscribe to Phone Scoop on YouTube

 

All content Copyright 2001-2013 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.
2