Cingulars Claim
http://www.cingular.com/enhancedNetwork »
(continues)
Drive tests were conducted in 290 US markets across the country, covering approximately 88% of the US population.
1.5 million calls were placed among the top carriers (Cingular, Verizon, Sprint, Nextel, T-Mobile) and the number of calls dropped versus the number of calls placed were recorded.
The results of the drive tests showed that Cingular was significantly better than all four of the other carriers on this measurement.
If the claim wasn't true, Cingular couldn't easily be advertising it. They would be sued out the ass.
cingular is just a desperate company trying to change their falling image and inferior network.
ArmySF said:
blah blah blah
What a catchy lead! That's about what I got from the rest of your post too.
Denial.
RUFF1415 said:
The drive tests were conducted by Telephia, an independent wireless research company.
Drive tests were conducted in 290 US markets across the country, covering approximately 88% of the US population.
1.5 million calls were placed among the top carriers (Cingular, Verizon, Sprint, Nextel, T-Mobile) and the number of calls dropped versus the number of calls placed were recorded.
The results of the drive tests showed that Cingular was significantly better than all four of the other carriers on this measurement.
If the claim wasn't true, Cingular couldn't easily be advertising it. They would be sued out the ass.
Yeah, this is the same independant company that ranked Verizon the best...
(continues)
Just go across the country and poll over-the-road truck drivers. They'll tell you which carrier is best π
magellan said:
"Independent wireless research company". Ok, yeah, and I bet they did it all for the good of humanity.
No, they get paid by companies that want to acquire their results. Cingular has been buying the results since 2001 in order to figure out areas that needed improvement. Looks like it's working.
RUFF1415 said:magellan said:
"Independent wireless research company". Ok, yeah, and I bet they did it all for the good of humanity.
No, they get paid by companies that want to acquire their results. Cingular has been buying the results since 2001 in order to figure out areas that needed improvement. Looks like it's working.
The "independent" portion of your argument loses all validity when Cingular is paying them! Is any other carrier paying them? If so, how much and who? Who is verifying their results? I smell BS.
Consumer Reports, JD Power, and anyone who has used VZW and Cingular know this is BS.
chaos987123 said:RUFF1415 said:magellan said:
"Independent wireless research company". Ok, yeah, and I bet they did it all for the good of humanity.
No, they get paid by companies that want to acquire their results. Cingular has been buying the results since 2001 in order to figure out areas that needed improvement. Looks like it's working.
The "independent" portion of your argument loses all validity when Cingular is paying them! Is any other carrier paying them? If so, how much and who? Who is verifying their results? I smell BS.
Consumer Reports, JD Power, and anyone who has used VZW and Cingular know this is BS.
The "independe...
(continues)
ArmySF said:
No, what is getting old is your refusal to understand the truth like the rest of America.
The rest of America? I would prefer that you spoke for yourself, not me or other plp who have other carriers π‘
Apparently we choose something else. Oh! and we are still americans π‘
RUFF1415 said:...chaos987123 said:RUFF1415 said:magellan said:
"Independent wireless research company". Ok, yeah, and I bet they did it all for the good of humanity.
No, they get paid by companies that want to acquire their results. Cingular has been buying the results since 2001 in order to figure out areas that needed improvement. Looks like it's working.
The "independent" portion of your argument loses all validity when Cingular is paying them! Is any other carrier paying them? If so, how much and who? Who is verifying their results? I smell BS.
Consumer Reports, JD Power, and anyone who has used VZW and Cingular know this
(continues)
I don't know about the other companies, usually the results are kept confidential within the companies to see where they need to improve. But I guess you give credit where credit is due.
There is no company out there that will invest money into testing and not have any guarantee of receiving payment for it? That's what a research company does, brilliant.
crazymicd said:
I want to know what percentage of calls were connected. From what I have heard Cingular has made it so that there phones will not connect if there is a chance the call will drop. If that is the case then there claims are bogus. If there was an emergency and my call would not connect, because It "could" drop the call I would be very upset!
LOL! Read what you just wrote! It doesn't make NY SENSE... You -vzw fan boys- invent anything... Gosh! π
Anxiovert said:crazymicd said:
I want to know what percentage of calls were connected. From what I have heard Cingular has made it so that there phones will not connect if there is a chance the call will drop. If that is the case then there claims are bogus. If there was an emergency and my call would not connect, because It "could" drop the call I would be very upset!
LOL! Read what you just wrote! It doesn't make NY SENSE... You -vzw fan boys- invent anything... Gosh! π
Could be worse. He could be like Cingular and try claiming that he has "the BEST network in the San Francisco Bay Area". π³ π π
I have peeps there, and they are laughing their asses o...
(continues)
That is totally untrue. Imagine...if Cingular was actually as bad as Verizon "fans" made it out to be and Cingular made it so that their phones won't connect a call if it could drop...nobody would ever get a call through!
And anyway, there is absolutely no way of knowing whether a call will drop before you connect it.
Whoever told you that is full of it.
crazymicd said:
Actually, I beleave I read it somewhere. Do research and find out if it is true. Don't just come out and tell me your opinion, cuz that means nothing! True facts that are documented are what I am looking for. When my Cingular phone had 2 bars of reception and I place a call and it says "Unable to connect", or just doesn't allow the call to go, thats when I get upset. With my Verizon phone I can connect with no bars as long as it says Verizon on the screen. I dropped Cingular last August and got another Verizon because of the not connecting problem.
No, I will not do research because I am telling you it is false. If you are the one that wants to make claims about Cingular, and you say you've...
(continues)
Of course there's going to be certain areas where Cingular is better than Verizon. Sprint as well. Ditto T-Mobile, even Nextel. Even a blind squirrel will find a nut eventually.
I just find it extremely funny that Verizon "fans" attempt to attack any and every positive statement that is made about Cingular...even if they're based on factual data.
I like Verizon. I don't have any problems with them now that I don't use them, because they make plenty of people happy. For me, Cingular is the one.
But why is it so hard for people to accept that Cingular may be better than Verizon at something?
I'll admit right now that Verizon is better than Cingular (and everyone else for that matter) in a hell of a lot of respects. It's not a hard thing to do.
Verizon claims Best Network according to...
THEMSELVES
Cingular claims least dropped calls according to a research company that has been around since before Cingular and Verizon were formed (and coincidentally had been rating Airtouch very well in So Cal).
If you don't like one claim because you feel it is biased, you are a hippocrite for believing the other.
Relax people.
I know plenty of customer who think Verizon is of poor quality for THEM and I know plenty who think Cingular is of poor quality for THEM.
The rest of this is just a big sword measuring contest.
You are an idiot, and seem to truly represent my statement above. You don't even realize the fact that I consistently support Verizon as a good carrier, you just want to rip me to rip me.
Like I said, devoid of meaning.
"For that reason, the most effective way to judge cell-phone service is through massive owner surveys -- massive enough that you'd still have thousands of respondents in the same areas -- enough that you'd be able to collect a consensus of opinion comprehensive enough to conclude which wireless carriers have the best network coverage, the fewest circuit overloads, the least number of dropped calls and the most effective customer service."
verizion makes a claim that they have the best network (and they don't)
cingular makes a claim that they have the best network (and they don't)
face it there is no best network. an independant test done by verizion doesn't give them right to say they are the best. if they weren't do you think they would say "hey t-mobile is better than us?" NO!
and cingular, you pay an independant company which is highly noted like jd powers to test your stuff against others. silly. nuff said.
and jd powers and consumer reports OVERATED!
However, my personal experience is this: I have both VZW (Moto E815) and Cingy (Moto ROKR) and at work I drop calls on VZW left and right. If I am not standing by a window, well, the call is going to end REAL soon.
Cingy works beautifully over the entire store.
I took both phones to the suburbs outside of Chicago; both worked quite well.
I have taken the phones out in the sticks south of Milwaukee; both work great.
So, not sure exactly what to think. VZW worked for me so well untill I moved closer to Milwaukee. Doesn't make much sense, I am closer to the city and my coverage is worse.....