Texting Increase -- September 1
Effective Sept 1, pay as you go texting will increase from $0.20 per outgoing message to $0.25
Also, unlimited family texting will go from its current price of $19.95 to $24.95/month. Thankfully they've decided that anyone on the $19.95 plan will be able to keep it, so if you are hesitating right now, get in and signed up before Sept 1 or pay the price with everyone else.
This company sucks more every single day. Mythos is a...
(continues)
motosux said:
Effective Sept 1, pay as you go texting will increase from $0.20 per outgoing message to $0.25
AT&T charges .20 per text, incoming and outgoing.
VZW charges .20 per text, incoming and outgoing, and .25 per pic message, in and out.
T-Mobile charges .15 per text, incoming and outgoing.
USCC doesn't charge for incoming text or MMS. So even at .25 per outgoing message, you can have a two way conversation that breaks down to 12.5 cents per message. Still a better deal than the other carriers.
My only complaint to this is that they didnt include pic messaging in this price increase as some justification.
Gotta pay for the increase in the cost of gas for the tower techs to maintain our awesome network! 😎
The fact that we may be equal too or cheaper than our competition wasn't the purpose of this post. The fact that it costs USCC virtually nothing for customers to text each other shouldn't warrant a price increase.
Does this mean a customer can cancel their contract without the ETF?
Probably not. But it's debatable. SMS is a vertical service not bound by the service agreement. If he were on an SMS plan, and they raised the rate of that plan, then yes, it would apply. But for PAYG, it's going to be pretty difficult to pull the legal card. He can sure try if he wants. But there really is no clear answer on this.
The only time this happens is when an actual price plan recurring charge is increased and the customer is forced to pay this higher premium.
Because pay as you go text messaging is optional to use, this does not qualify.
However, the free incoming text messages is such a great value. I get spam text messages every now and again...so with any other company I would have to pay for those, and that's just a rip off!
However, I am an employee and feel that that is incorrect.
I was able to cancel a contract on my wife's Sprint account back when they changed the fee.
This IS a 'material change to the term's and conditions.' Every customer, regardless of having a text plan, has the capability of sending a text message. That is explained to you when you sign up for service. If that price has changed, then you have the option of cancelling.
The only thing is... if you make a payment after that change in text pricing, then you are agreeing to any change to the contract.