Phone Scoop

printed July 24, 2014
See this page online at:
http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/discuss.php?fm=m&ff=88&fi=753214

Home  ›  News  ›

FasTap Video Diary

Article Comments  

Back to message list

Top message:  Disappointing... by acnova1   Aug 23, 2006, 10:49 AM

Replying to:  Re: Disappointing... -- THIS VIDEO REVIEW SUCKS! by malejko   Aug 23, 2006, 2:53 PM

Re: Disappointing... -- THIS VIDEO REVIEW SUCKS!

by eric Lin    Aug 24, 2006, 3:37 PM

malejko, i am no longer a scientist,

but i don't believe that i corrupted the design of this experiment by explaining t9 to tim. i also explained things like how punctuation work on fastap. additionally i gave time practice time with each method and allowed him about twice as much practice time with fastap than with t9 because of the new letter layout.

if you were *really* worried about my expiremental design, then i would admit that it is invalid because their is only 1 subject in each group. that is not valid statistically, but it is still better than just the opinion of 1 guy who uses t9 every day.

i would agree there are people who will find learning fastap easy. learning how to use the fastap keyboard is (other than punctuation and the space key) self explanatory. (yes, i had to explain the space key symbol to tim, my control subject.) one key = one letter. however i would argue that with a name like "FASTap," that the makers are implying this is a faster text entry method, which is what i wanted to check.

i hope that a GSM fastap phone is produced and sold in north america so that you can get one. there is no reason to deny you a phone you're looking forward to whether we found it faster or not.

Report to moderator

Replies


This forum is closed.

Back to message list

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Twitter Phone Scoop on Facebook Phone Scoop on Google+ Subscribe to Phone Scoop on YouTube Follow on Instagram

 

All content Copyright 2001-2014 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.
2