Home  ›  Phones  ›  Nokia  ›

Nokia 6225 / PM6225

 

Info Photos News Forum  82 Reviews  

Average Ratings

3.5
Overall
 
 

Please log in to post a review.

Sort by most:      
 
Page 123 4 

what are they thinking

 

May 26, 2004 by babyface

i cant believe this is what nokia came to the fight with. "what are they thinking" the camera (sucks) ring tones (sucks) battery life(sucks...okay okay a few good things infraed transfer, fm radio (witch is pretty good)..but thats about it.


Avoid this phone Avoid sprint

 

Aug 19, 2005 by Clentfamily

The only thing this phone has is a few cute ringtones. It is very difficult to navigate. The battery life is poor and the camera quality is a joke. [...]

Ed. note: Removed rant about carrier

Advertisements       reviews continues below...


nokia 6225 Bad Battery , good phone

 

May 29, 2004 by smutkov

This battery is worst battery I have ever had . and I have had 8 different cell phones.

I like the phone, just not used to having to charge every night.

Also, I do not even use the camera, or text messaging.


Why do Nokia, Radio Shack, Sprint

 

May 2, 2004 by madatnokia

The phone features FM radio but it is only possible with the head set add on not included in purchase price.

This is the classic bait and switch so you must continue to add items to get the full service from your phone!

Why the heck Nokia wouldn't have the market savy to include the head set in the purchase price so that the FM actually works is just plain dumb.

I will prolly take this phone back after the short battery life and inability to access the feature without more & expensive add ons.

Nokia et al better find another three legged pig to eat b/c this ones gonna hobble out of their life!! lol

 
Page 123 4 

Add your review

Subscribe to reviews of this phone with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Twitter Phone Scoop on Facebook Subscribe to Phone Scoop on YouTube Follow on Instagram

 

All content Copyright 2001-2022 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.