Home  ›  Phones  ›  Samsung  ›

Samsung SGH-i320


Info Photos News Forum Reviews  2  

You must log in to post.


Nov 25, 2006, 2:54 PM

Black JAck vs. Pearl


Help me decide.....Black Jack or Pearl?

I have heard good things about both phones and now cant decide.

My phone "wants" include mp3/media device, web browser, easy data (text) entry, blue tooth connection to my Sony Viao (sync Outlook emails).

Any advice?

Nov 20, 2006, 5:10 AM

Landscape issue with tomtom


happy with my i320 i installed Tomtom 6. Installation was fine, but when launching the software (after the tomtom splash screen, which is OK), the software turns the display 90 degrees counterclockwise. The arrow keys actually work and I can access menus. But it displays landscape in this upward fashion and therefore is unusable.

I guess it must be tomtom that somehow detects a landscape screen and wrongly decides to turn the display?

It there a way to control how my OS displays various applications. A registry setting or likewise to control screen direction?

Thanks for any help. 🙂

Nov 10, 2006, 9:16 AM

When is it coming out

Any news on this? I heard that Cingular was going to release it but still nothing out there.

Jun 14, 2006, 1:16 PM

who is supposed to get it?

t-mobile hopefully!!
20 replies

Oct 25, 2006, 5:50 PM

i607 Black Jack comming to Cingular

The Samsung rep today showed us the Samsung SGH-i607 "Black Jack" which should be hitting Cingular stores starting the 6th of November. The phone looks very similar to this one, however there are significant differences. The main difference is that the Cingular version will have HSDPA/WCDMA.

Oct 17, 2006, 10:30 PM

i320 functionality, AIM browsing

just wondering if the device is pretty quick with web browsing, i h ad a sidekick 3 but lookin for something a little smaller, and was wondering if i can install aim or something cuz i dont really use msn messenger.

Oct 9, 2006, 8:52 PM

Car charger and a question re e-mail

I have been trying to find a car charger to use with this unit. Anyone have a source?

Also, I have been trying to access company e-mail, and need to install a certificate (dcrootcert) but the phone won't let me (something about not having sufficient security clearance). Anyone have any ideas?

Other than that I love the phone!

Jul 11, 2006, 5:36 PM

i320 to be used in USA?

I'm a big fan of the Samsung i320 which unfortunately isn't offered by a carrier within the US. IS there anyway I can import the phone and use it with an existing carrier such as Cingular or T-mobile? Below is an excerpt that may help, but doesn't provide much detailed or smart phone specific information.

"You may find that your particular GSM carrier does not offer this specific phone model. This is not a problem if the band/frequency of the phone and the GSM carrier match (i.e., the phone will work)."

"In the USA, the largest GSM carriers are Cingular Wireless, AT&T Wireless and T-Mobile. However, there are numerous other GSM carriers in the USA and world-wide that would also support this phone."

Additionally, someone at sam...
6 replies

Jun 15, 2006, 10:21 AM

Near perfect device except it runs Winblows

Uhg, I would snatch this baby up in a second if only it didn't run WIndows mobiles. 😡 RATS!

Looks like it'll be T-Mobile getting this judging form the specs.
2 replies

Jun 14, 2006, 7:36 PM


so i thought a while back the FCC mandated that all phones activated in the united states were required to have gps location. how is it that this phone along with a couple other samsung phones like the x475 do not have gps? wierd
4 replies

Jun 17, 2006, 10:00 PM


Well OK, I read it somewhere that the shape and the form of this phone does bear a good resembleance to the TI Scientific Calculators that we all used during college, and I agree with that..

Hopefully when designing the next smartphone, Samsung designers will have some sense knocked into them and not go all retro.. 😁
1 reply

Jul 5, 2006, 2:53 PM


Is it just me, or is samsung copying pretty much every one of moto's moves? They don't seem to realize that having two of every thin phone on the market is really annoying
2 replies

Jun 22, 2006, 5:11 PM

Using the Internet??

Could someone tell me if I could have full access to the internet on this PDA, or would it be limited what I could view. Could I scroll to any page I want viewing the full page or just parts of the page. Thank you very much.
2 replies

Jun 18, 2006, 10:57 PM
over in the "3GSM 2006" discussion:

Stereo BT on the nokia 6131?

at the bottom of the page it says

"Although Nokia considers it mid-range, the 6131 is fairly feature-packed, including quad-band GSM, EDGE, stereo Bluetooth, a megapixel camera, and a microSD card slot."

but that is the only place i see that says it has stereo bluetooth. can anyone confirm that it does?


Jun 14, 2006, 12:10 PM


Sammy's answer to the Moto Q......
2 replies

Jun 14, 2006, 11:15 PM


1 reply

Jun 14, 2006, 12:15 PM

"Hey Guys, dya'know what would be so super great!?!?"

"A phone that's just like the Blackberry, but made by somebody other than RIM. I'd like a Nokia! . . .naw, maybe a Motorola. . . or howzabout a Samsung! Aw, but it'll never happen - who really cares about the Blackberry market anyway?"

3 replies

Feb 15, 2006, 10:54 AM
over in the "3GSM 2006" discussion:

How's the W950's keypad?

this seems like a really cool device, despite the lack of camera, i'm just wondering how the 'flush' feeling keypad felt. Especially the dedicated music keys (they looked cramped)

thanx in advance rich
10 replies

Feb 16, 2006, 3:41 PM
over in the "3GSM 2006" discussion:


I've been reading about this "partnership" between Microsoft, Virgin and BT to work together on a mobile TV effort called Movio.

Anyone have any thoughts on why MS and VM would attach themselves to a platform that plans to use DAB, rather than DVB-H? From what I've heard, DVB is much more likely to become the eventual standard... or, if not, then something other than DAB (FLO, TDtv, etc).

Is it just that they want to get to market first, screw the eventual problems?
1 reply

Feb 16, 2006, 1:02 AM
over in the "3GSM 2006" discussion:

Samsung i320 vs. Motorola Q Plastics/Build Quality

I noticed that in the i320 article, it was mentioned that the Q felt hollow and cheap. Does it feel hollow in the way of cheap plastics (like the E815), or just simply becasue it is light? How much better are the plastics/build quality on the Samsung?

Thank you! As you can see, I am very concerned about exterior build quality in my handsets. Motorola historically hasn't delivered that, for me.
2 replies
Page  1  of 1

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Threads Follow @phonescoop on Mastodon Phone Scoop on Facebook Follow on Instagram



All content Copyright 2001-2023 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.