VERIZON LOSING CUSTOMERS?????????????
HA!
megs72979 said:
I work for cingular, according to our porting department, verizon is taking a few days to release numbers because they cannot handle the volume of numbers porting out.
HA!
Now, this doesn't even make sense.
texaswireless said:
Why doesn't it make sense?
First, why would verizon have a hard time managing the number of port outs? Why and how would Cingular's port center know about it. and last why the hell would they tell megs to relay it to phonescoop. Even if it was true, Cingular corporate would never release a statement like that, almost bashing the competition. So it is either a rumor someone told megs or a rumor megs made up.
Employees in different departments talk to each other. They get bored and have nothing else to talk about.
It is a rumor, but that doesn't mean it's not credible.
ralph_on_me said:
The port centers talk to each other, that's their job. They call up each other when there are problems to make things work smoothly for the customer.
Employees in different departments talk to each other. They get bored and have nothing else to talk about.
It is a rumor, but that doesn't mean it's not credible.
Somehow, this rumor lacks credibility.
muchdrama said:ralph_on_me said:
The port centers talk to each other, that's their job. They call up each other when there are problems to make things work smoothly for the customer.
Employees in different departments talk to each other. They get bored and have nothing else to talk about.
It is a rumor, but that doesn't mean it's not credible.
Somehow, this rumor lacks credibility.
Especially since Verizon has had the lowest Churn in the industry since....well....since cell phones were invented (or at least it seems that long).
SForsyth01 said:muchdrama said:ralph_on_me said:
The port centers talk to each other, that's their job. They call up each other when there are problems to make things work smoothly for the customer.
Employees in different departments talk to each other. They get bored and have nothing else to talk about.
It is a rumor, but that doesn't mean it's not credible.
Somehow, this rumor lacks credibility.
Especially since Verizon has had the lowest Churn in the industry since....well....since cell phones were invented (or at least it seems that long).
But somehow, according to Megs, Cingular can't handle the thousands of Verizon subs...
(continues)
muchdrama said:...SForsyth01 said:muchdrama said:ralph_on_me said:
The port centers talk to each other, that's their job. They call up each other when there are problems to make things work smoothly for the customer.
Employees in different departments talk to each other. They get bored and have nothing else to talk about.
It is a rumor, but that doesn't mean it's not credible.
Somehow, this rumor lacks credibility.
Especially since Verizon has had the lowest Churn in the industry since....well....since cell phones were invented (or at least it seems that long).
But somehow, according to Megs, Cingular can't
(continues)
SForsyth01 said:...muchdrama said:SForsyth01 said:muchdrama said:ralph_on_me said:
The port centers talk to each other, that's their job. They call up each other when there are problems to make things work smoothly for the customer.
Employees in different departments talk to each other. They get bored and have nothing else to talk about.
It is a rumor, but that doesn't mean it's not credible.
Somehow, this rumor lacks credibility.
Especially since Verizon has had the lowest Churn in the industry since....well....since cell phones were invented (or at least it seems that long).
But someho
(continues)
muchdrama said:ralph_on_me said:
The port centers talk to each other, that's their job. They call up each other when there are problems to make things work smoothly for the customer.
Employees in different departments talk to each other. They get bored and have nothing else to talk about.
It is a rumor, but that doesn't mean it's not credible.
Somehow, this rumor lacks credibility.
I wouldn't give the rumor much credit, but I wouldn't discount it entirely either. I definitely wouldn't spend two days debating the subject on forums.
ralph_on_me said:muchdrama said:ralph_on_me said:
The port centers talk to each other, that's their job. They call up each other when there are problems to make things work smoothly for the customer.
Employees in different departments talk to each other. They get bored and have nothing else to talk about.
It is a rumor, but that doesn't mean it's not credible.
Somehow, this rumor lacks credibility.
I wouldn't give the rumor much credit, but I wouldn't discount it entirely either. I definitely wouldn't spend two days debating the subject on forums.
Well think about it, Ralph. Whichever call center she's talking about can't ha...
(continues)
Their numbers combined are only about 250,000 more additions per quarter than VZW. And VZW has the LOWEST churn in the industry. Do the math. It will take MUCH longer than 1 year for Sprint/Nextel to catch a company that is starting off 2,000,000 subscribers ahead (VZW). Without taking into consideration Churn, it would take S/N 2 years, only based on their advantage in subscriber additions (advantage based on combining the 2 company's quarterly numbers).
And another thing....Nextel has always had the best Churn???? What screwed up planet have you been living on. VZW has held that title for at least 5 years.
SForsyth01 said:...
Sprint/Nextel will pass VZW in a year or so???? ๐ You must have lost your mind. ๐
Their numbers combined are only about 250,000 more additions per quarter than VZW. And VZW has the LOWEST churn in the industry. Do the math. It will take MUCH longer than 1 year for Sprint/Nextel to catch a company that is starting off 2,000,000 subscribers ahead (VZW). Without taking into consideration Churn, it would take S/N 2 years, only based on their advantage in subscriber additions (advantage based on combining the 2 company's quarterly numbers).
And another thing....Nextel has always had the best Churn???? What screwed up planet have you been living on. VZW has held that title for at le
(continues)
With regards to Nextel has the best churn, yes, recently they have cept verizon, now, is a few basis points lower. Nextel also has a higher arpu and higher lifetime revenue per user then verizon also. In addition, boost mobile their prepaid market is only $10 less in arpu then verizon, which is PATHETIC!
nextel18 said:
Yep, I did my computations concerning how many Nextel/sprint gets per quarter and what verizon gets per quarter. Find the post and you can see my analysis.
With regards to Nextel has the best churn, yes, recently they have cept verizon, now, is a few basis points lower. Nextel also has a higher arpu and higher lifetime revenue per user then verizon also. In addition, boost mobile their prepaid market is only $10 less in arpu then verizon, which is PATHETIC!
๐
What is pathetic is that a prepaid service can is a company's only claim to fame anymore....
Cingular - 50.5 Million Customers
Verizon - 45.5 Million Customers
Nextel - 17 Million Customers
Now who is pathetic. And ...
(continues)
they have a total of 43 million customers.
well, you are still like before, but that isnt new.
nextel18 said:
by the way, the sprint is with nextel too, i am not sure if you knew that.
they have a total of 43 million customers.
well, you are still like before, but that isnt new.
THEY ARE 2 SEPARATE COMPANIES!!!!!!!!
The merger has not completed yet, and it still has many hurdles to clear before it is complete (which, I might add, is still well behind your initial timeline).
I will restate this to make you happy:
Cingular - 50.5 Million Subscribers
Verizon - 45.5 Million Subscribers
Sprint - 28 Million Subscribers
Nextel - 17 Million Subscribers
Now who is pathetic??? It looks even worse for your precious nextel when you throw Sprint into the mix.
SForsyth01 said:...nextel18 said:
by the way, the sprint is with nextel too, i am not sure if you knew that.
they have a total of 43 million customers.
well, you are still like before, but that isnt new.
THEY ARE 2 SEPARATE COMPANIES!!!!!!!!
The merger has not completed yet, and it still has many hurdles to clear before it is complete (which, I might add, is still well behind your initial timeline).
I will restate this to make you happy:
Cingular - 50.5 Million Subscribers
Verizon - 45.5 Million Subscribers
Sprint - 28 Million Subscribers
Nextel - 17 Million Subscribers
Now who is pathetic??? It looks even worse for your precious nextel when you throw Sprint into t
(continues)
Why do you say that? Their boost service is only about $10 less in arpu then cingular's, which is quite pathetic. In addition, Nextel has the best churn, best arpu, and best lifetime revenue per user then any other carrier even your almighty cingular. In addition, when sprint/Nextel merges they will be very strong especially against the almighty cingular. They will have the highest arpu, and the highest lifetime revenue per user and perhaps the highest data arpu, but I am not sure on that.
Given all of that, Nextel is a huge competitor in this industry and the combined Nextel/sprint will be even bigger, especially with their management core, their 80 MHz of spectrum, 4...
(continues)
For Nextel being on iden, they have the best, most reliable customers. Again, highest arpu, best churn, great margins, and the best lifetime revenue per user.
Therefore, youโre saying that iden is the problem. Well, I would say youโre wrong by the industry leading metrics.
Funny thing is, cingular/att wireless is still having problems integrating their two networks. However, guess what? They both use TDMA AND GSM and still having problems, which is pathetic.
what's going on with all these suits against the 2 companies
https://www.phonescoop.com/news/item.php?n=1287 »
I think that if the affiliates sue them for violating their clause sprint/Nextel will be forced to buy them out.
hellfire666 said:
thanks for the input. that's good to know.
Except for the fact that Sprint can't afford to do that...
More and more affiliates are jumping in to prevent it from happening. So, no 'non-events' going on here.
And you mentioned that ATT/Cingular were having all these problems integrating the network. Everything I have read actually shows that the integration is going well. Care to show us your sources? Or are they 'non-events'?
Al_Swearengen said:
More 'non-events'? ๐
More and more affiliates are jumping in to prevent it from happening. So, no 'non-events' going on here.
And you mentioned that ATT/Cingular were having all these problems integrating the network. Everything I have read actually shows that the integration is going well. Care to show us your sources? Or are they 'non-events'?
Al, he's been making up stuff about the network integration going wrong from the get go. Just ignore him. Or bash him relentlessly for my entertainment. Either or.
nextel18 said:
sorry, sir. i do have a life and have been very busy today and for the past weekend. sorry that i dont revolve my life around phonescoop. lol
And yet you match us post for post. Interesting.
I don't think you understand the implications of these issues.
If they choose to buy them to make it "go away" it will add billions to the cost of the merger. This additional cost is something you previously cited was "overpayment" by Cingular for ATTWS. Are they now going to end up overpaying for Nextel? You can't have your interpretation go both ways.
If they choose to dig in their heels and fight they have several contract issues that are legitimate concerns. Sprint/Nextel will have issues in Nextel partners markets competing and using the name. S/N will have issues in affiliate markets since most of them have agreements that Sprint cannot offer a competing service.
Now if they buy all the "problems" they will ...
(continues)
They wonโt be overpaying for Nextel. They already paid their moneys for Nextel. By the way, itโs actually a merger of equals where 1.3 shares are exchanged and .50 per share in cash is given. That is chump change. (I.e. $2billion)
Anyway, when they spin off their local division it will kick off a lot of the debt thatโs already on the books.
Again, if they have to buy out the affiliates, then itโs a non-event, as I keep on saying.
If there will be forced divestitures, then thatโs a good thing, because they will be able to sell some licenses or whatever to any cdma buyer. (There are plenty of them)
Again for the 100th time it's a non-event.
Us Wired was a non-event, same with the o...
(continues)
I think we need to make a friendly wager about these affiliates. I believe the costs were not adequately measured in regards to these companies. I am willing to bet the costs to deal with these affiliates whether via aquisition or settlement will exceed 15 billion. That isn't chump change.
I almost passed out laughing
Sprint/Nextel
7.3 million Subscribers
Verizon wireless=
6.3 million Subscribers
2005 net adds
Sprint/Nextel
1st quarter= 1.3 million+ 810k subscribers= 2.1 million
2nd quarter=
3rd
4th
Verizon wireless=
1st quarter= 1.6 million
2nd quarter=
3rd
4th
Letโs estimate and say that Nextel/sprint based on the 2.1 million per quarter will end up with about 8.4 million per year.
Verizon wireless over the year with just using their 1st quarter sub additions would be 1.6 million times 4, which equals 6.4 million subscribers.
Thus; Nextel/sprint has 2-million subscriber surplus over verizon at the end of the year and that is of course if they continue on their current trends.
...
(continues)
nextel18 said:...
2004 net adds
Sprint/Nextel
7.3 million Subscribers
Verizon wireless=
6.3 million Subscribers
2005 net adds
Sprint/Nextel
1st quarter= 1.3 million+ 810k subscribers= 2.1 million
2nd quarter=
3rd
4th
Verizon wireless=
1st quarter= 1.6 million
2nd quarter=
3rd
4th
Letโs estimate and say that Nextel/sprint based on the 2.1 million per quarter will end up with about 8.4 million per year.
Verizon wireless over the year with just using their 1st quarter sub additions would be 1.6 million times 4, which equals 6.4 million subscribers.
Thus; Nextel/sprint has 2-million subscriber surplus over verizon at the end of the year and that is of course if they cont
(continues)
Pssst, he just talking about your mom! ๐ฒ
uNt0uChAbLe said:
Oh cmon muchdrama, I know you can do better than that. I miss when you and nextel would rip each other relentlessly. Are you waiting for him to start something? *shoves Nextel18 into muchdrama*
Pssst, he just talking about your mom! ๐ฒ
Nextel's pretty much given up on responding to me 'cause he can't take my superior wit and intellect. As for the whole "ripping him relentlessly" thing...I decided to pull my punches a little so as not to attract so much attention. I don't necessarily want to get banned, you know.
P.S. I was just kidding about the superior wit and intellect. I can barely handle my infant son.
With that said, i have ignored all of his posts since a few weeks now, and will continue to do so.
You wonโt get a reply out of me towards him.
thanks.
Put your (proverbial) money where your mouth is.
Once you commit I will be happy to give you my theory. It is very easy to understand and makes sense based on buyout prices of several companies, not just US Wired.
They said that they paid about 1.3 billion dollars and they have 500k subscribers, which mean that it comes out to be $2,600 per subscriber. Therefore, we will do the same exact calculations with the other affiliates.
Sprintโs affiliates are= UbiquiTel + Alamosa + US wired.
Nextelโs affiliates are= Nxtp, however, they have a put option clause, so it will be difficult to count them, but we will do the same with the $2,600 per subscriber.
Let us start with sprints affiliates first.
1. US wired were taken care of for $1.3 billion.
2. Alamosa has about 1.5 million subscribers and that is multiplied by $2,600 which gives a total of= $3.9 billi...
(continues)
Dude, why do you let your immature childlike actions ruin a good debate.
I told you I would give you figures when you pony up, which you did.
Patience man.
Immature childlike actions? What actions? Doing computations that you couldnโt do? Yea, very immature. Lol
nextel18 said:
I have no patience when people say a figure without proving it as I have. I did my computation while you havenโt.
Immature childlike actions? What actions? Doing computations that you couldnโt do? Yea, very immature. Lol
You never show your cards when someone is trying to make a wager involving you. ๐
texaswireless said:
I asked if you wanted to wager. Do you want to or not? Do you believe in your theory or not?
Put your (proverbial) money where your mouth is.
Once you commit I will be happy to give you my theory. It is very easy to understand and makes sense based on buyout prices of several companies, not just US Wired.
Just wanted to make sure and get you to commit to a figure.
Now, since buyouts are not based on subscribers alone but also points of presence, you cannot simply value them based on one deals cost per sub.
Since Alamosa (and other publicly traded affiliates) also service many other additional markets their value will be much higher. They own more spectrum, not just more ...
(continues)
like i said with partners i told you there is a put option involved and they can get a lot of money from that, but i was just doing per subscriber times $2600.
Anyway.
I stand by that.
It wasnโt a 35 billion dollar price tag lol. It was a merger of equals with .50 cents per share going to shareholders or up to $2.6 billion dollars. It was mostly an all-stock deal so shareholders will get a lot more stock and not much cash. Therefore, it isnโt truly a $35 billion dollar deal. Sorry ๐
Now, the cingular deal was an all cash deal and not a sto...
(continues)
And I guess the Wall Street Journal is wrong about the deal. They said it was a $35 billion deal.
http://www.mobiletracker.net/archives/2004/12/12/spr ... »
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/57807 »
They said, Nextel partners, US wired, Alamosa and ubiquitel, and that are all i used. Sorry.
Again, that is a mostly all stock deal with a cap of $2.6 billion in cash to the shareholders.
It isnโt in theory a $35 billion dollar deal, because of it mostly being stock and rolled into the new company's stock symbol "s". The cash portion is what counts.
Good luck.
While they mentioned just the major players, all affiliate subs are at risk (unless someone operates in a market w/o Nextel currently. I used all affiliate figures and plugged them into your formula.
In this wireless industry, everyone is at risk.
nextel18 said:...
They are not any competition to cingular. Hmm thatโs interesting.
Why do you say that? Their boost service is only about $10 less in arpu then cingular's, which is quite pathetic. In addition, Nextel has the best churn, best arpu, and best lifetime revenue per user then any other carrier even your almighty cingular. In addition, when sprint/Nextel merges they will be very strong especially against the almighty cingular. They will have the highest arpu, and the highest lifetime revenue per user and perhaps the highest data arpu, but I am not sure on that.
Given all of that, Nextel is a huge competitor in this industry and the combined Nextel/sprint will be even bigger, especially with their managemen
(continues)
1. In 2007 half of Nextelโs towers/spectrum would be on the cdma network anyway.
2. Its very easy to transform the 800 MHz contig spectrum into cdma spectrum.
3. Yes, their arpu data arpu, churn, and lifetime revenue per user will still be strong. They offer very good products now and new in the future.
4. The integration between Nextel/sprint wouldnโt be that hard, especially when you have one of the best CTO in the land! In addition, add the great management core by Nextel and sprint, and you will have a great company.
5. dual phones would take care of that problem at first(it will include push to talk by the way), and then qchat will be ...
(continues)
dual phones would take care of the problem to a point for some loyal customers, but ask anyone at Cingular - GAIT phones were nothing more than "complaint machines" - dropped calls left and right until the GSM network was built out enough to overtake TDMA. Unless, of course, ...
(continues)
This is a false statement. They are actually working on that and so far it is looking good.
"I don't see them taking over VZW anytime too soon (maybe 2-3 years out if they can prove the merger is going smoothly), let alone Cingular."
I do. I did the numbers on another post that you can find an analyze my computation. Maybe they wonโt pass cingular right now, but verizon they will.
I do like some of your points though, but keep in mind, cingular/att wireless are a lot weaker then sprint/Nextel with a lot of the important metrics and most importantly, Nextel/sprint has the best CTO in the land as well as the b...
(continues)
nextel18 said:
"I don't see them taking over VZW anytime too soon (maybe 2-3 years out if they can prove the merger is going smoothly), let alone Cingular."
I do. I did the numbers on another post that you can find an analyze my computation. Maybe they wonโt pass cingular right now, but verizon they will.
but my point is that your numbers are based on the assupmtion that there will not be an increase in people leaving the company due to the problems associated with merging.
nextel18 said:...
I do like some of your points though, but keep in mind, cingular/att wireless are a lot weaker then sprint/Nextel with a lot of the important metrics and most importantly, Nextel/sprint has th
(continues)
With your second point, i have been hearing that they have been having a lot of problems and my sources include corp and other sources that are tied into cingular/att wireless. In addition, consumers who i talk to on a daily basis also have been saying that they have been experiencing a lot of problems with result of the integration. (It is coming from the horse's mouth, not mine.)
In addition, you mentioned about Nextel/sprint might be facing problems with integration; i differ, because again, they...
(continues)
It isnโt a couple, itโs many. Sorry.
nextel18 said:
In addition to that, i talk with consumers who are nationwide who also explain to me whets going on with the merger.
So explain to us how this enormous customer group let's you in on proprietary merger information. 'Cause we'd love to know.
See it talk to informative people, while you just list your parents and a few people of sources.
So who should I believe you or them? Hmm. That is quite difficult to decide. Lol.
Good luck.
By the way, I know whom I talk to. ๐
Thanks.
By the way good luck.
"highier"
And don't even try to say that it was a typo, because you mispelled it twice.
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
If you're going to attempt to insult people, at least do it right.
nextel18 said:
So yes, Nextel/sprint will have a different outcome then cingular/att wireless's integration situation.
You're basing that statement on nothing concrete. We have absolutely NO idea how smoothly this integration will go.
muchdrama said:nextel18 said:
So yes, Nextel/sprint will have a different outcome then cingular/att wireless's integration situation.
You're basing that statement on nothing concrete. We have absolutely NO idea how smoothly this integration will go.
If it happens at all.
with your "PLEASE WAIT WHILE WE LOCATE THE NEXTEL SUBSCRIBER" statment, you dont get why it says that. it says that becuase the customer (nextel's) can be on the direct connect, or the internet and that is why that message is told. it has nothing to do with coverage.
if nextel does "suck", then why do they have the best metrics in the industry, and why do they have a push to talk product that is better then a cdma solution and will be better the...
(continues)
nextel18 said:
with your "PLEASE WAIT WHILE WE LOCATE THE NEXTEL SUBSCRIBER" statment, you dont get why it says that. it says that becuase the customer (nextel's) can be on the direct connect, or the internet and that is why that message is told. it has nothing to do with coverage.
Actually, that's a complete falsehood. While I used Nextel service, I had friends complaining every once in a while about how they couldn't get through to me even though my phone was sitting on my counter untouched. I've got the same complaint from a friend who's used Nextel's service for a good 6 years.
anyway its all about numbers and metrics. by the way, now they are number 3 and almost will be number 2 with total subscribers.
its all about churn, lifetime revenue per user, and arpu. you have those and you will do quite well.
they cover 263 million people and covers 297 out of the top 300 markets in the united states. with their lack of spectrum, that is quite good.
nonetheless, that will all change with this merger.
in addition, boost mobile, Nextelโs prepaid service is the best in the industry and what is funny is that their arpu is only 9 dollars less then both cingular and verizo...
(continues)
nextel18 said:...
Yea, its not a great opinion, though, al though I do give you credit for saying what you did.
1. In 2007 half of Nextelโs towers/spectrum would be on the cdma network anyway.
2. Its very easy to transform the 800 MHz contig spectrum into cdma spectrum.
3. Yes, their arpu data arpu, churn, and lifetime revenue per user will still be strong. They offer very good products now and new in the future.
4. The integration between Nextel/sprint wouldnโt be that hard, especially when you have one of the best CTO in the land! In addition, add the great management core by Nextel and sprint, and you will have a great company.
5. dual phones would take care of that problem at first(it will include push to talk b
(continues)
ConvergysSlave said:
Or when these young people get older they will dump T-mobile and move to an Adult company. And considering there is a growing older population base it may actually be the exact opposite of what you predict.
I am in no way predicting that T-Mo will ever come close to being the size of Cingy, VZW, or S/N.
What I was trying to elude to was that Nextel currently likes to market their products toward lower income young people (in addition to the traditional business that can benefit from Direct Connect). My prediction was that when the merger goes through, the younger generation that Nextel is appealing to right now will go to either T-Mobile (hugely growing young subscriber base) or ...
(continues)
SForsyth01 said:...ConvergysSlave said:
Or when these young people get older they will dump T-mobile and move to an Adult company. And considering there is a growing older population base it may actually be the exact opposite of what you predict.
I am in no way predicting that T-Mo will ever come close to being the size of Cingy, VZW, or S/N.
What I was trying to elude to was that Nextel currently likes to market their products toward lower income young people (in addition to the traditional business that can benefit from Direct Connect). My prediction was that when the merger goes through, the younger generation that Nextel is appealing to right now will go to either T-Mobile (huge
(continues)
muchdrama said:...SForsyth01 said:ConvergysSlave said:
Or when these young people get older they will dump T-mobile and move to an Adult company. And considering there is a growing older population base it may actually be the exact opposite of what you predict.
I am in no way predicting that T-Mo will ever come close to being the size of Cingy, VZW, or S/N.
What I was trying to elude to was that Nextel currently likes to market their products toward lower income young people (in addition to the traditional business that can benefit from Direct Connect). My prediction was that when the merger goes through, the younger generation that Nextel is appealing to right
(continues)
SForsyth01 said:...muchdrama said:SForsyth01 said:ConvergysSlave said:
Or when these young people get older they will dump T-mobile and move to an Adult company. And considering there is a growing older population base it may actually be the exact opposite of what you predict.
I am in no way predicting that T-Mo will ever come close to being the size of Cingy, VZW, or S/N.
What I was trying to elude to was that Nextel currently likes to market their products toward lower income young people (in addition to the traditional business that can benefit from Direct Connect). My prediction was that when the merger goes through, the younger generati
(continues)
ConvergysSlave said:
Or when these young people get older they will dump T-mobile and move to an Adult company. And considering there is a growing older population base it may actually be the exact opposite of what you predict.
Who's to say this young demographic will dump Tmobile in favor of another carrier? Research shows people tend to stay with carriers they're happy with.
nextel18 said:
That is very true. In addition, when the other carriers are starting to attack the older age markets with different products it will entice them to leave tmobile USA. In addition, tmobile USA will lose a lot of customers when they wonโt be able to roll out a higher speed data with umts/hsdpa. As I keep on mentioning its all about arpu, DATA arpu, lifetime revenue per user and churn. If you win those metrics, you will be the industry leader in every category.
The only people who are nerdy enough to give 2 $hits about high speed data on a phone are those of us who frequent this website. The lack of 3G will not hurt T-Mobile in the near future (long term it will, if they don't react soon) beca...
(continues)
Yes, 3g will hurt providers who donโt have a 3g network. As I keep on saying, soon this market will get saturated and DATA arpu will be extremely important. By the way, did you check out DATA arpu for the carriers? Well, if you havenโt which I am sure you didnโt, those numbers are rising quarter after quarter, which tells us what? PEOPLE WANT DATA SERVICES! In addition, did you look at how many people signed onto verizon's ev-do system? Probably not, but anyway, they got a very nice base right now and it is continuing to grow on a daily basis.
It is all about 3g! Therefore, your theory that no one cares for 3g or data services is false with my statements.
Do some rese...
(continues)
nextel18 said:...
Here he goes swearing again. Lol. Nothing else is new anyway.
Yes, 3g will hurt providers who donโt have a 3g network. As I keep on saying, soon this market will get saturated and DATA arpu will be extremely important. By the way, did you check out DATA arpu for the carriers? Well, if you havenโt which I am sure you didnโt, those numbers are rising quarter after quarter, which tells us what? PEOPLE WANT DATA SERVICES! In addition, did you look at how many people signed onto verizon's ev-do system? Probably not, but anyway, they got a very nice base right now and it is continuing to grow on a daily basis.
It is all about 3g! Therefore, your theory that no one cares for 3g or data services is false
(continues)
SForsyth01 said:...nextel18 said:
Here he goes swearing again. Lol. Nothing else is new anyway.
Yes, 3g will hurt providers who donโt have a 3g network. As I keep on saying, soon this market will get saturated and DATA arpu will be extremely important. By the way, did you check out DATA arpu for the carriers? Well, if you havenโt which I am sure you didnโt, those numbers are rising quarter after quarter, which tells us what? PEOPLE WANT DATA SERVICES! In addition, did you look at how many people signed onto verizon's ev-do system? Probably not, but anyway, they got a very nice base right now and it is continuing to grow on a daily basis.
It is all about 3g! Therefore, your theory that no one ca
(continues)
muchdrama said:...SForsyth01 said:nextel18 said:
Here he goes swearing again. Lol. Nothing else is new anyway.
Yes, 3g will hurt providers who donโt have a 3g network. As I keep on saying, soon this market will get saturated and DATA arpu will be extremely important. By the way, did you check out DATA arpu for the carriers? Well, if you havenโt which I am sure you didnโt, those numbers are rising quarter after quarter, which tells us what? PEOPLE WANT DATA SERVICES! In addition, did you look at how many people signed onto verizon's ev-do system? Probably not, but anyway, they got a very nice base right now and it is continuing to grow on a daily basis.
It is all about 3g! T
(continues)
SForsyth01 said:...nextel18 said:
Yea, its not a great opinion, though, al though I do give you credit for saying what you did.
1. In 2007 half of Nextelโs towers/spectrum would be on the cdma network anyway.
2. Its very easy to transform the 800 MHz contig spectrum into cdma spectrum.
3. Yes, their arpu data arpu, churn, and lifetime revenue per user will still be strong. They offer very good products now and new in the future.
4. The integration between Nextel/sprint wouldnโt be that hard, especially when you have one of the best CTO in the land! In addition, add the great management core by Nextel and sprint, and you will have a great company.
5. dual phones would take care of that problem at
(continues)
They will be able to retain them. Look at their lifetime revenue per user. They are number 1 and number 2 in the industry.
nextel18 said:...
Of course, young people are flocking to Nextel/sprint. Look at virgin mobile and boost mobile. They are prepaid customers targeting the same customers tmobile is, and guess what? Boost and virgin mobile are one of the best-prepaid products in the industry. In addition, boost mobile has the best arpu and lowest churn in the prepaid market. In addition to that, Nextel and sprint are doing extremely well with their core businesses and their mvno/affiliates and wholesale. No one is leaving them because their churn is decreasing by a few basis points every quarter while arpu and data arpu increases.
They will be able to retain them. Look at their lifetime revenue per user. They are number 1 and number 2 in t
(continues)
anyway... now i will keep my promise and say that you will be on ignore now...
since you say stupid things, there is no point of debating with you anymore.
sorry.
nextel18 said:
didnt even read it....
anyway... now i will keep my promise and say that you will be on ignore now...
since you say stupid things, there is no point of debating with you anymore.
sorry.
Just quit posting here. This post is a perfect example of how you react when you are confronted with factual statements that prove how little you actually know about this industry. Like a little child.
Much, yourself, and I are all supposedly "on ignore". It is extremely funny that he always chooses to not read the posts that disprove his very ramblings and then ignores us from then on.
RUFF1415 said:
Join the club. ๐
Much, yourself, and I are all supposedly "on ignore". It is extremely funny that he always chooses to not read the posts that disprove his very ramblings and then ignores us from then on.
But that is how all individuals would act when proven wrong. At least all individuals that have too much pride to admit when they are wrong.
nextel18 said:...
They are not any competition to cingular. Hmm thatโs interesting.
Why do you say that? Their boost service is only about $10 less in arpu then cingular's, which is quite pathetic. In addition, Nextel has the best churn, best arpu, and best lifetime revenue per user then any other carrier even your almighty cingular. In addition, when sprint/Nextel merges they will be very strong especially against the almighty cingular. They will have the highest arpu, and the highest lifetime revenue per user and perhaps the highest data arpu, but I am not sure on that.
Given all of that, Nextel is a huge competitor in this industry and the combined Nextel/sprint will be even bigger, especially with their managemen
(continues)
megs72979 said:
GOOD LUCK with nextel, i don't even see them as competition. i would suggest saying no to number guard when they offer it so when you want to leave nextel it doesn't take over a week.
Marvelous job answering the guy's question.
By the way, according to channel checks, it looks like verizon and cingular will be number 1 and number 2 respectively. My take is that verizon will be number 1 and cingular will be number 2 when they report their q2 earnings.
nextel18 said:
This is actually a very dumb comment to say. A few days are the right amount of time for porting in numbers and porting out numbers.
By the way, according to channel checks, it looks like verizon and cingular will be number 1 and number 2 respectively. My take is that verizon will be number 1 and cingular will be number 2 when they report their q2 earnings.
From the king of dumb comments himself. ๐คฃ
Ok, so according to your 'channel checks', Verizon will have more than Cingular based on 2Q 2005 reports?
That's right there next to impossible.
Currently, Cingular has 50.3 million customers and Verizon has 46 million. So, you're saying that will gain more than 5 million customers...
(continues)
Al_Swearengen said:...nextel18 said:
This is actually a very dumb comment to say. A few days are the right amount of time for porting in numbers and porting out numbers.
By the way, according to channel checks, it looks like verizon and cingular will be number 1 and number 2 respectively. My take is that verizon will be number 1 and cingular will be number 2 when they report their q2 earnings.
From the king of dumb comments himself. ๐คฃ
Ok, so according to your 'channel checks', Verizon will have more than Cingular based on 2Q 2005 reports?
That's right there next to impossible.
Currently, Cingular has 50.3 million customers and Verizon has 46 million. So, you're saying that
(continues)
" My take is that verizon will be number 1 and cingular will be number 2 when they report their q2 earnings."
Notice where it says when they report their q2 earnings.
If this doesn't convince the rest of the AWS customers to switch to a better network and get off the crappy TDMA system, I don't know what will... Wait yes I do, special promotion mailers being sent out for: 400 daytime minutes for $29.99 or 1000 for $39.99. With, of course, MTM and N&W minutes. Well no MTM on the $29.99 but with 400 minutes, you can't go wrong.
It was about time that they took off the 18-dollar fee for migration. That was a very stupid decision, in my view, to charge customers who were forced to go to cingular to also get charged extra for it.
๐
they took it off recently to make the transition easier. in my market, at&t customers now have to wait the same period to get a cingular phone as cingular customers do to upgrade. 11 months in a one year and 21 months in a two year contract. cingular obviously has exceptions since we no longer offer at&t phones for people to migrate earlier.
megs72979 said:
verizon charges the same fee to upgrade and activate.
they took it off recently to make the transition easier. in my market, at&t customers now have to wait the same period to get a cingular phone as cingular customers do to upgrade. 11 months in a one year and 21 months in a two year contract. cingular obviously has exceptions since we no longer offer at&t phones for people to migrate earlier.
Verizon has never charged an upgrade fee. The only activation fee you get charged is when you first sign up for service.
Even AWS charged a fee to upgrade the phones, even if they switched to the AWS GSM system.
"Hey need more daytime minutes for the same price, renew for another 1-2 years and it's yours for the rest of this rate plans life."
The Cingular oppressor doesn't have that, it's all about the money. People are greedy bastards.
That reminds me, I have to go after my friend who owes me $600.00.
well goodnight and we can continue tomorow or day after.
i wish you a good night. ๐
get that friend! lol.
In my opinion Cingular deserved it. Why? Because...
when my mom's phone stopped working for no reason, cingular told her that she would have to spend 100 dollars to get a new phone, whereas T-mobile would have sent her a replacement at no extra cost.
When I have talked to customer service (when I had cingular) they would tell me to go to a local store rep, and when I went to the store rep, they told me to call customer service!!!!
T-Mobile
Get More From Life.
From where are you getting this days time period?
Not a valid source
E911 hasn't had a hard rollout date so your comparison is not valid.
November 26th, 2003 (top markets) and May 26th 2004 (rest of country) number portability was required to be made available with a 3 hour completion time. Fines would be assessed for carriers not complying with this time period. I would be wiling to bet over 90% of the responders here would agree ports take about 3 hours.
BTW, what are "the charges".
e911=
http://www.fcc.gov/911/enhanced/ »
"The deployment of E911 requires the development of new technologies and upgrades to local 911 PSAPs, as well as coordination among public safety agencies, wireless carriers, technology vendors, equipment manufacturers, and local wireline carriers. The FCC established a four-year rollout schedule for Phase II, beginning October 1, 2001 and to be completed by December 31, 2005"
The FCC has granted various limited waivers of the Phase II rules to wireless carriers, subject to revised deployment schedules and quarterly reporting requirements. The revised schedules and reporting requirements for each carrier may be reviewed in t...
(continues)
texaswireless said:
From where are you getting this days time period?
I can't say for sure, but I bet it tickles something fierce when he pulls it out of there... ๐
Aleq said:texaswireless said:
From where are you getting this days time period?
I can't say for sure, but I bet it tickles something fierce when he pulls it out of there... ๐
Dammit, man! Coke on the monitor again!
HA!
if you can make up posts, so can I!
HA HA!
probably the most uncredible post ever.
port center reps aren't going to know anything about carrier successes/troubles any faster than regular employees.
(continues)
I don't know why it would make a "satisfied" Cingular customer happy that Verizon may have lots of numbers porting over to other carriers. Even if the rumors were true, how does it benefit the customers of Cingular? It's like a big personal,emotional race here between Cingular and Verizon--each one trying to say "Na Na Na Na Na Na" to the other. If you're happy with Cingular, great, stay with them. No need to trash Verizon, the company with the better reputation for quality (deserved or not). Does trashing Verizon give you some kind of pleasure? Lets say Veri...
(continues)
I guess it's also like people and their cars. GM vs. Ford, American vs. Japanese cars. Or Apple computers vs. Windows. People get pretty loyal and a lot of times, comments are based on emotions rather than hard facts.
I guess the carriers involved have to be happy that they have created such strong loyalties.
You may want to recheck your sources and make sure they know what they're talking about before posting it.
megs72979 said:
I work for cingular, according to our porting department, verizon is taking a few days to release numbers because they cannot handle the volume of numbers porting out.
HA!
In Your Face!
See? now, who is losing customers? or better yet.... mmmm... who is not adding enough customers?
1.9 millions customers added on 2Q. VZW (even thou not a big fan any more) has impressed me on 2Q results.
BeachSlapped said:megs72979 said:
I work for cingular, according to our porting department, verizon is taking a few days to release numbers because they cannot handle the volume of numbers porting out.
HA!
In Your Face!
See? now, who is losing customers? or better yet.... mmmm... who is not adding enough customers?
1.9 millions customers added on 2Q. VZW (even thou not a big fan any more) has impressed me on 2Q results.
Okay?
BeachSlapped said:megs72979 said:
I work for cingular, according to our porting department, verizon is taking a few days to release numbers because they cannot handle the volume of numbers porting out.
HA!
In Your Face!
See? now, who is losing customers? or better yet.... mmmm... who is not adding enough customers?
1.9 millions customers added on 2Q. VZW (even thou not a big fan any more) has impressed me on 2Q results.
Yep, and so much for the credibility of megs' 'porting department'.
I mean, if it ever had any to begin with. ๐
Seriously, read the news. VZW added 1.9 million folks 2nd quarter. Cingular, 1.07 million. Which makes megs' orginal post:
megs said:
I work for cingular, according to our porting department, verizon is taking a few days to release numbers because they cannot handle the volume of numbers porting out.
HA!
... more than a bit off.
HA! yerself, megs. ๐คฃ
but anyhow Im Planning on checking Cingular out for a lil while to see how they perform against the comp as a customer they rock in pretty much every aspect of the wireless industry all you have to do is a lil research to find this out.. but cing...
(continues)