My problem with VZW - Prove me wrong...
Cingular, Tmobile & Sprint - Yes, by comparison their networks do not have nearly the coverage that VZW does...But you know what Cingular, Tmobile and Sprint do not do?
THEY DO NOT CRIPPLE THEIR DAMN PHONES IN THE NAME OF GENERATING MORE REVENUE.
When a new phone is released to Sprint and Verizon with Bluetooth file transfer and DUN capabilities, here's the process from Sprint:
"Cool! This phone can transfer files via bluetooth between a computer and the phone AND it can be the modem for a laptop too! Kick Ass! Our customers will love it!"
Here's the process from Verizon:
"Uh Oh, this phone will transfer files via bluetoot...
(continues)
as for you crying like a school girl about paying 15$ to use your blackberry as a modem no one cares, if you had a pc card it would be 59.99 for just broadband on the laptop.
44.99 for unlimited broadband access +15 for the added ability to tether it =59.99, but you get it on your blackberry plus your laptop. how is that a rip off?
every carrier has its pro's and cons. VZW's pros are the best network and customer service(along with tmobile) the cons are "crippled" bluetooth. We feel the pro's far outweight the cons, and if you are not...
(continues)
Because the phone does it NATIVELY and VZW purposefully DISABLES it so they can charge for it and VZW's competition DOES NOT DO THAT.
It's like buying a car with a navigation system in it, the dealer disables it and says but you can pay X amount a month to use it if you like...You paid for the car AND the navigation system and the dealer F'd you. VZW disabling DUN on phones that worked in this manner natively is VZW F'ing you - period.
Folks like you that seem to be happy in the face of someone screwing you over crack me up...It's like you like being abused or something.
...
(continues)
The frquency is 850 CDMA and VZW has NOT activcated a single CDMA 850 tower yet...why, they just bought that spectrum.
Sadly...they sold the towers necessary to use the CDMA 850 already.
The frquency is 850 CDMA and VZW has NOT activcated a single CDMA 850 tower yet...why, they just bought that spectrum.
Sadly...they sold the towers necessary to use the CDMA 850 already. you do know 800 and 850 has been the same.
BECAUSE THEY CAN.
Yep, either you like the service and put up with the things you don't like or you leave.
To bitch and moan really won't change anything... not until Sprint/Cingy/T-Mo can offer the complete package the way VZW does, VZW aint gonna do squat because why should they... they lead in new customers every quarter... don't fix what ain't broke.
Do I like it... no but I had Cingular for 3 months and had to drop it over CS. I won't even bother with Sprint and T-Mo.
Oh? Is that how VZW got to where it is today? Cingular? Any other company on Earth? By just ignoring feedback from customers? Hmmm...Me thinks you need to take a business class or two to gain a clue.
BTW, if I need to take a Business class or two (which I don't... my MBA from U of Penn (Wharton) can attest to that) you need to take a writing comprehension course or two because your rant is completely incoherent. "Me thinks...", ok lets leave Popeye out of this... he's good people too.
I think you need to grow a brain...I didn't say squat about whether they were number one or not...I'm quite sure they are, they do have the best coverage.
"BTW, if I need to take a Business class or two (which I don't... my MBA from U of Penn (Wharton) can attest to that)"
You apparently didn't learn much...Businesses have to cater to their clients to survive - period. That does not hold true only for rave reviews, that also holds true for complaints and pissed off customers. So again, if you don't like it, don't read the complaints.
Again, you don't like that? Ok fine...take a hike.
You're kidding yourself if you think that Cingular, Sprint, T-Mob, etc gives away services because they are benevolent companies. They are doing it because they are getting their ass kicked and they need to generate revenue however possible to keep stockholders happy. Be it 7pm N&W, rollover minutes, free bluetooth transfer, whatever. If any of the others were on top they wouldn't need to suck people in with gimmicks. Rollover minutes were genius. They picked up a ton of customers that will never use all the rollover anyway a...
(continues)
Reselling a product that is exactly as it is when it came out of the factory it was built in, with the exact and intended functionality it was designed to have is NOT giving something away as you say. The mere fact that you think that shows your skewed thinking.
If you don't like it, take a hike.
sdgmcdon said:
No, you don't get it...You consider it a perfectly legitimate practice to cripple something then sell it to customers then tell them you will essentially reverse the crippleing of it for X amount a month. I CALL THAT UNETHICAL - PERIOD.
Reselling a product that is exactly as it is when it came out of the factory it was built in, with the exact and intended functionality it was designed to have is NOT giving something away as you say. The mere fact that you think that shows your skewed thinking.
If you don't like it, take a hike.
So to continue on that theme, they shouldn't be charging for mobile web on regular phones. It comes with the functionality to do it. 🙄 Again, its a bu...
(continues)
VZW has to do nothing to make DUN work it’s a feature of the phone, as an example if you have a Motorola V710 you can us DUN to dial an ISP and access the net at 14.4k or you could choose pay VZW for mobile web $5.00 and then access the 1xrt network at 144k or you could have owned the first versions of the Motorola E815 and choose to acces...
(continues)
jcoberg10 said:
businesses have to cater to the majority of their customers if that means making a profit quarter over quarter to maintain a Good network for their phones to work then so be it?? they don't change their entire business structure to cater to one bitching customer.
Thank you! Something must be working in spite of all the b....! This world we live in just continues to became more, "Me, Me, Me" if I dont like something, well that major corporation should change it just for ME! Unbelievable! Obviously if things were not working for VZW I am more than quite sure the higher powers would make changes, and for all you may know things could be in the process (not saying that they are!) but cou...
(continues)
If he/she/it does have an MBA it just goes to show what that will get you these days.
sdgmcdon said:
"To bitch and moan really won't change anything"
Oh? Is that how VZW got to where it is today? Cingular? Any other company on Earth? By just ignoring feedback from customers? Hmmm...Me thinks you need to take a business class or two to gain a clue.
I took me a class or two in business at the Shaneequa Janelle Schmooey Anderson Community Technical Vocational College in Schmooeyville, Indiana. I learnt me a lot about them there businesses. And I got my Associates degree in Underwater Naked Hoochee Dancing.
I am still confused about how good the call service is, since I couldn't even receive a call with VZW inside my house, but can with T-Mobile. If I have a prob with T-Mobile in the future I am going to back to Cingular because when I had them, they were better than Verizon too, so it all depends on what region you are in. I am also not just saying this because I don't like VZW, I constantly check signals and keep track of where my phone calls are being lost, and that is sad if I can't get calls inside a house so I will never believe in "Its the Network!"
And I was tired of hearing VZW people saying "none of my other customers ...
(continues)
Well, with any network there are differences in exact areas covered and deadspots. A dead spot here and there in a home here or there is typical of anyones coverage.
ArmySF said:
Just another reason why Tmobile is so awesome, verizon lies and you won't have to worry about that with Tmobile they have service everywhere, including the ranch!!!!!!!
Really? Cause T-Mobile does not have coverage where I am. In fact, I don't think there is T-Mobile service for, oh, I don't know, 100 MILES IN ANY DIRECTION??? Point of fact, NO WIRELESS CARRIES PICKS UP EVERYWHERE AND ANYONE WHO TELLS YOU THEY DO IS LYING TO YOUR FACE! Its a radio signal, subject to the same restrictions and barriers as ANY OTHER radio frequency. Basically, you buy what works for you. T-Mobile cornered your market? Swell. Go for it. VZW? Fine. Buy what makes you happy. If you find you do nothing but whine ab...
(continues)
sdgmcdon said:
Cingular, Tmobile & Sprint - Yes, by comparison their networks do not have nearly the coverage that VZW does....
Ex-cuuuu-se me??? 😡 Have you ever seen a Cingular coverage map?
schlittertex said:
Hell yes, I got charged 200 bucks roaming charges alone, IN LOS ANGELES! "THANKS VERIZON!" for that bill, you twits.
Well, maybe if you paid attention to what plan you had which obiviously had to have been an OLD one, then you would know what coverage you had.. So.. who is the twit, the irresponsible one? BTW, there is a extra fee for babysitting! 🤣
I really think you should look at a Cingular coverage map sometime. They do street-level coverage and the interface is almost identical to T-Mobile's.
Cingular- 3 levels of signal strength
Sprint- 3 levels of signal strength
Verizon- No signal strength details and does not allow you to zoom in anywhere near street level. In fact, in Washington, DC the maximum zoom level could show both Washington, DC and Baltimore in the same map if you are centered between those cities. Not a very good maximum zoom level. How about sharing some of that testman data with the rest of us hmmm?
Oh well
Which means that not even the lwer downs in Corporate know the results..and certainly NOT any of the sales people.
Love how a comapny tells ppl where to test and what type of test to place. Doesn't show much. Get 3rd party results..then come bragging to rest of the world. (And im not talking about Consumer based reports...those are changing like a hearbeat these days.)
jmac32here said:
Oh wait..The VZW "Internal Tests" are still Classified??
Which means that not even the lwer downs in Corporate know the results..and certainly NOT any of the sales people.
Love how a comapny tells ppl where to test and what type of test to place. Doesn't show much. Get 3rd party results..then come bragging to rest of the world. (And im not talking about Consumer based reports...those are changing like a hearbeat these days.)
So Consumer Reports magazine isn't a 3rd party. Well skippy f-ing day, I didn't know that. JD Powers, oh, that doesn't count either. Who exactly would be satisfactory for this determination. Oh yeah, anyone who doesn't rate VZW at the top, got it. 🙄
sangyup81 said:
T-Mobile- 5 levels of signal strength
Cingular- 3 levels of signal strength
Sprint- 3 levels of signal strength
Verizon- No signal strength details and does not allow you to zoom in anywhere near street level. In fact, in Washington, DC the maximum zoom level could show both Washington, DC and Baltimore in the same map if you are centered between those cities. Not a very good maximum zoom level. How about sharing some of that testman data with the rest of us hmmm?
Don't know where you work, but I can zoom in on street level maps and do everyday , also pull up cell sites, measure distance, et, you must be looking at a way different map than me!
So far, when it comes to Coverage Locators, VZW is in last place...and they still have the bold disclaimer.
Maybe where you are they don't have this issue, but here they do and excuse me for being concerned about whether or not a cell company can provide reliable coverage where I live.
The world does not revolve around you.
Also, years ago I traveled the country for my job, at that time Sprint was the best company for that specific purpose (every large city covered etc). But the signal was only good in large cities, on major freeways and airports...pretty much every where else, no signal. I suppose it's possible that has changed and I have heard from others that it has, but I'm still in contract with VZW (though I pay them enough each month that I'd likely ...
(continues)
It's the consumer market, get use to it.
And do you really think the folks over at VZW don't read whats being said about them on this forum?
And/or do you really think I haven't mentioned this to VZW directly as well?
"The only way any company is going to make a change is if enough people call in about it"
It seems you know why I complain about it...But yet, you still feel the need to bitch at me for doing it...Interesting.
"If you really hate the company that bad, then switch carriers and deal with less service"
I don't hate the company and I've already said why I wont switch companies.
It's amazing to me how brain dead the people on this forum ar...
(continues)
Second, I know I can tether on other carriers with these (or similar) phones for no more than I pay for the data plan...That was kind of my point of the post.
Third, not everyone is a complete technology geek that can't wait to hack their cell phones like you. Some people just want to buy a cell phone and use it.
Lastly, put the joint down.
And obviously access on a laptop will cost more (or the same as competitor's in this case), you're transferring more data! If competitor's offer a laptop access solution for less then $59.99 why do they even offer aircards for that price?
I pay comcast extra for my HD channels, but why? My TV and cable box are already NATIVELY capable of HD. And on top of paying for the service...
(continues)
You can't find it because it's not an option...it just works because the phone natively supports it; kind of my point.
I went through Cingulars site, seems like they are taking on the Verizons stance with the blackberry specifically, however with the other smart phones (most capable of DUN) they leave the ability for it to act like a modem for a laptop intact and they do not charge you to use it as such. Same with Sprint & Tmobile. VZW on the other hand, disables it on everything and allows it only on the blackberry and only for $15/month...
Quick note here I thought was funny. In the typical response from a VZW employee again I heard "security" as the reason for...
(continues)
and some quick browsing on howardforums showed that most people are stealing their tethering from sprint by disabling some crap on their phones or something.
lol, so if Sprint's going to keep letting people steal their service more power to them...
Also after browsing howardforums, I found a link to Cingular's data plans:
https://www.cingular.com/midtolarge/data_connect »
and look at that under LaptopConnectCard or Tethered Device unlimited service starts at $59.99.
same thing goes for cingular as I said wit...
(continues)
I would say I'm sorry to see that the majority of people seem to think this is a completely reasonable and acceptable practice.
I'm just not a sheeple.
It seems like the INDUSTRY, not vzw set the standard that broadband laptop access is going to cost $59.99, if vzw is being such nazis for charging for tether access, wouldn't competitor's gain more by offering cheaper prices not matching vzw?
So I think your argument has been reduced to the standard blahblah bluetooth obex restrictions. Yes, everyone knows it's not for security, but as long as they are making millions off gin downloads that isn't going change....
(continues)
Cingulars basic description of the blackberry 7130c
"Find form and function in this stylish, lightweight, phone-style handset with the Cingular exclusive SuretypeTM QWERTY keyboard. Browse the web, view attachments and run applications with Quad-band, high-speed EDGE, and Bluetooth®. It's got a sleek design, fast performance, light sensing screen, and more. Plus speakerphone, Bluetooth® technology, IM, and polyphonic and MP3 ringtones. Best of all, no need to carry a wireless PC card. Just connect your laptop or desktop computer to the Internet and use the 7130c as a tethered modem."
Notice the last sentence. Now, select the phone and go through the services menu's to add voice service, data etc...THERE I...
(continues)
So I stand corrected, either way my original point was other companies do have specific tether plans that are generally more expensive then pda only access. So, Cingular is the same price for unlimited and Sprint is $20 cheaper. Minutes are cheaper tmobile and metro then vzw, cing or sprint, but if companies can charge more for a "superior" product why shouldn't they?
And you can tether on nonblackberry devices. The 700p, moto q, and a lot of their phones, lg 9800, 8300, 8100, moto v3c/m, k1m, samsung a930, a990 are all tetherable off the top of my head. Yes, it looks like...
(continues)
Voice service is the most standard service built into a phone. You pay a minimum in order to use the network. I really don't see how tethering is any different. Pricing aside, are you not paying for an additional service?
Two posts ago you stated the numbers for me... $40 for sprint's phone as modem plan is more then the $20 or whatever they charge for powervision and I'm still kinda confused about how cingular is charging for tether access... but we agree that they have different plans for tethering blackberries, correct?
Their data plans are kinda confusing, but statements like:
"Note: Customers who wish to tether with their PDA device and have an unlimited PDA data plan will need to upgrade their rate plan to a Data Connect Plan for Laptops. Unlimited Data Connect Plans for PDA do not include tethering capabilities and may incur additional charges."
directly from cingular's website:
https://supportcingular.atgnow.com/cng/resultDi »...
(continues)
$40 is cheaper than Verizons $45 + $15
Cingular only mentions the that unlimited blackberry service also allows tethering. They say nothing about the non BB phones which all support DUN thus would work as a modem.
Your link is nice, problem is data connect applies to corporate med-->large business accounts, not personal individual accounts.
http://www.cingular.com/midtolarge/data_connect »
And here it shows the unlimited data...
(continues)
sdgmcdon said:...
"No, Verizon does not disable their entire handset line up besides the blackberry for tethering, if you even read my previous post I listed 10+ phones off the top of my head that are tetherable"
I must have missed that, 10 phones from VZW that are tetherable WITHOUT PAYING THE EXTRA $15? If so, I'm intriqued. If not, my points stand.
"Yes, Verizon may be more expensive then it's competitors, and I think that is your only real point in this thread"
Seriously, take a reading comprehension class.
My entire point to this thread was not that VZW is more expensive than it's competitors, that's a given as apparently you understand (glad to know you understand something). My point was that (pay atten
(continues)
trevor83 said:...sdgmcdon said:
"No, Verizon does not disable their entire handset line up besides the blackberry for tethering, if you even read my previous post I listed 10+ phones off the top of my head that are tetherable"
I must have missed that, 10 phones from VZW that are tetherable WITHOUT PAYING THE EXTRA $15? If so, I'm intriqued. If not, my points stand.
"Yes, Verizon may be more expensive then it's competitors, and I think that is your only real point in this thread"
Seriously, take a reading comprehension class.
My entire point to this thread was not that VZW is more expensive than it's competitors, that's a given as apparently you understand (glad to know you understand somet
(continues)
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
sdgmcdon said:
And as I've said in this post previously that apparently some folks around here cannot absorb I like Verizon for their coverage and support, what I don't like is the ripoff $15/month tethering and the fact that you can't do it at all on a non-blackberry device without 3rd party software that VZW will BILL YOU FOR if they find out your using it for such purposes.
As stated elsewhere, there are many pda and non pda Verizon phones that are tetherable. Not sure where you're getting the understanding that only the Blackberry's are capable of such a service.
turbodeuce said:
I think your argument has been reduced to the standard blahblah bluetooth obex restrictions. Yes, everyone knows it's not for security, but as long as they are making millions off gin downloads that isn't going change. I know it has been said before, but the average customer does not care about obex.
What does OBEX have to do with GIN? You can't even transfer a ringtone with BT these days, much less a collection of DRM protected GIN files.
Please tell me how disabling BT has carriers "making millions off gin downloads".
turbodeuce said:
Exactly, if they had obex and were able to transfer ringtones they wouldn't be purchased off of gin. I was actually grouping pix in there too.
I agree, but still confused about the policy. Why does Verizon allow OBEX transfers on some handsets and not others? Why do they offer it on initial releases, like the V3c and 6256i and then pull it on a later release?
yeahright said:
why are they worried abut file tranfer when i send my ringtones through mms and get my pictures off using a micro sd card, so what difference would it make either way i am not paying for gin. I will tell you...the are just evil 😈
Ha ha. I enjoy this forum so much because of you. I have absolutely no gain by exposing the VZ tactics, except for fun.
I just watch their policies, stock value, and bad business practices.
The time is coming when VZ will destruct and become just a leader of connectivity, where they belong. Like AT&T did.
Do you know that AOL is for FREE now, because content and control at the same time didn't work?
Yellowrose said:
Which stock value of VZW are you watching?? Don't believe the company is publicly traded on the market. 🤨
Verizon Communications (Public, NYSE:VZ)has been flat since the handset crippling started.
wnrussell said:Yellowrose said:
Which stock value of VZW are you watching?? Don't believe the company is publicly traded on the market. 🤨
Verizon Communications (Public, NYSE:VZ)has been flat since the handset crippling started.
Verizon Communications is "One" of Verizon Wireless parent companies, not the only one.. VZW is not publicly traded... They are in a sense seperate.
wnrussell said:...yeahright said:
why are they worried abut file tranfer when i send my ringtones through mms and get my pictures off using a micro sd card, so what difference would it make either way i am not paying for gin. I will tell you...the are just evil 😈
Ha ha. I enjoy this forum so much because of you. I have absolutely no gain by exposing the VZ tactics, except for fun.
I just watch their policies, stock value, and bad business practices.
The time is coming when VZ will destruct and become just a leader of connectivity, where they belong. Like AT&T did.
Do you know that AOL is for FREE now, because content and control at the same time didn't work?
(continues)
turbodeuce said:
and some quick browsing on howardforums showed that most people are stealing their tethering from sprint by disabling some crap on their phones or something.
lol, so if Sprint's going to keep letting people steal their service more power to them...
Well, according to Living Ghost people are hacking their Verizon phones for free tethering, too. 🤣
also where are you at the vzw has the BEST coverage. ive never traveled to a place where my cingular phone didnt work but my verizon did.
Here is an Act that would give consumers the choice to do exactly that:
http...
(continues)
You have zero understanding of how a free market operates. You could choose to do what you want yet you don't. You want to force your choice on a carrier who is very successful with their business plan because it does not suit YOU.
Portland Oregon. Verizon is best here, Tmobile is probably 2nd, Cingular and Sprint 3rd and 4th.
Verizons has without a doubt the most reliable and vast coverage in the state. Tmobile is really good as well in both signal coverage and reliability, but not quite as good as Verizon. Cingular has good coverage but apparently cannot handle the capacity as the calls drop constantly. Sprint doesn't have the coverage area, but does do ok with reliability.
https://www.phonescoop.com/phones/phone.php?p=553 »
the samsung a920 doesnt support obex. theres a few of them that dont have obex on sprints network.
sdgmcdon said:
Not sure what point your trying to prove...If the phone itself doesn't have it from the factory in the original design the carrier bought I wouldn't expect the carrier to ADD IT. I'm talking about it being part of the phone design and manufacturing from the getgo and Verizon specifically DISABLING IT.
I agree. It's the OEM features that should not be tampered with by the retailer.
http://www.canyouhearusnow.net/action/ »
sdgmcdon said:
I haven't heard of any...
Portland Oregon. Verizon is best here, Tmobile is probably 2nd, Cingular and Sprint 3rd and 4th.
Verizons has without a doubt the most reliable and vast coverage in the state. Sprint doesn't have the coverage area, but does do ok with reliability.
Again... I'm not sure where you are getting your info on coverage from. Sprint in Oregon is wonderful, especially in the PDX area. And if you do get into the boonies, you still have roaming coverage. I still have not found a place in Oregon I can't make and sustain a call. I'll say it again... try Sprint.
As for where I'm getting the info from; just experience.
New_2_T-Mobile said:
stop crying like a little baby, man up and port 🙄 geez some peoples kids 🙄
I did try to port and my Verizon CDMA phone is so locked up that no other carrier can activate it.
Just makes me more angry.
wnrussell said:New_2_T-Mobile said:
stop crying like a little baby, man up and port 🙄 geez some peoples kids 🙄
I did try to port and my Verizon CDMA phone is so locked up that no other carrier can activate it.
Just makes me more angry.
NO CRAP IT IS, did you not know this? Port to another carrier you can't take a crippled locked down verizon phone to another carrier.
A Canadian friend of mine used to roam the USA with a Bell Mobility E815, but when he wanted to move his phone to Verizon he was not allowed to.
True portability would mean having the ability to purchase an unbranded phone with the features you want and then move it to the carrier of your choice, like you can do in most other parts of the world.
wnrussell said:
True portability would mean having the ability to purchase an unbranded phone with the features you want and then move it to the carrier of your choice, like you can do in most other parts of the world.
I agree with you but what the hell does that mean, NOTHING the rules are not like that here, so what can we do NOTHING, i guess u can cry about it all day on this damn forum but how does that make you feel better? PORT what is so complicated.
"I agree with you but what the hell does that mean, NOTHING the rules are not like that here, so what can we do NOTHING"
Um, that's why we submit complaints to sites that VZW monitors in addition to complaining directly to VZW, so that eventually, with enough backlash (no thanks to morons such as yourself) this would change.
Idiot
It's amazing to me how few people that respond to these types of threads actually have the ability to use the grey matter in their head.
...idiots
wnrussell said:
Phone number portability was mandated to make it easier to switch between carriers. What good is it if, you can take your number with you, if you can't move your phone?
A Canadian friend of mine used to roam the USA with a Bell Mobility E815, but when he wanted to move his phone to Verizon he was not allowed to.
True portability would mean having the ability to purchase an unbranded phone with the features you want and then move it to the carrier of your choice, like you can do in most other parts of the world.
"True portability" here is simply your personal opinion. Portability is the ability to keep your PHONE #, nothing else. Verizon, Sprint, Alltel, US Cellular etc use CDMA tech...
(continues)
crazyeaglefan236 said:
or better yet, have an XM ready head unit and want to be able to use that headunit for Sirius and require the manufacture to make this work for free...after all, why should you have to pay for a feature of this radio to work? That is an outrage.
I agree it is an OUTRAGE!!
wnrussell said:crazyeaglefan236 said:
or better yet, have an XM ready head unit and want to be able to use that headunit for Sirius and require the manufacture to make this work for free...after all, why should you have to pay for a feature of this radio to work? That is an outrage.
I agree it is an OUTRAGE!!
Great, push your bill and watch the price of equipment go thru the roof. Thanks, brilliant strategy.
Take some responsibility for your actions instead of trying to change the industry. You could choose what you desire but you didn't.
texaswireless said:
Take some responsibility for your actions instead of trying to change the industry. You could choose what you desire but you didn't.
How about doing BOTH? Take some responsibility AND try to change the industry?
crazyeaglefan236 said:
So I suppose that if you wanted to port a Cingular phone and come to Verizon Wireless you would be able to keep your phone?
You're CrazyEagleFan! Just look here:
http://www.canyouhearusnow.net/ConsumersUnionLetter.pdf »
Basically, you know what I am trying to say here... Phone locking has gotten beyond control !!
wnrussell said:crazyeaglefan236 said:
So I suppose that if you wanted to port a Cingular phone and come to Verizon Wireless you would be able to keep your phone?
You're CrazyEagleFan! Just look here:
http://www.canyouhearusnow.net/ConsumersUnionLetter.pdf »
Basically, you know what I am trying to say here... Phone locking has gotten beyond control !!
Two pieces of equipment with different technologies in them is NOT locking. Granted, a T-Mob phone to Cingular switch is a valid argument as both are GSM. CDMA and GSM are as incompatible as FM and XM. What part of that don't you understand? They physically DON'T have the capability to be interchanged. UNLESS you b...
(continues)
fooldmeonceagin said:
Your not porting your phone but your phone number.
I know that. And you know that porting your number to another carrier means throwing your existing phone in the garbage because it will not work with whatever carrier you port over to.
Read this link, a great letter to the FCC:
http://www.canyouhearusnow.net/ConsumersUnionLetter.pdf »
wnrussell said:
I know that. And you know that porting your number to another carrier means throwing your existing phone in the garbage because it will not work with whatever carrier you port over to.
Read this link, a great letter to the FCC:
http://www.canyouhearusnow.net/ConsumersUnionLetter. ... »
Ummm, not exactly true. If you're porting from T-Mo to Cingular, as long as you've been active for at least 90 days you can request a sim unlock code to use the phone with Cingular. You can even request an unlock code after you've cancelled, if you request it within 90 days of cancelling. I'm not sure what Cingular's policy on it is, but I can't imagine it's too different. If you buy your phone unlock...
(continues)
craptacularwireless said:
So are you saying you would like Verizon to switch to GSM? Not going to happen.
NO. I'd like to buy an unbranded CDMA 850 / CDMA 1900 phone and then move it around to any compatible network without having to buy a new phone.
The processes you describe so eloquently, simply don't exist. You must remember that when there are phones with multiple features that VZW locked there IS a reason for it. It's not just to charge extra although they ARE a business and as such are absolutely interested in the bottom line and in being so interested are intent on listening to requests from customer's who generate real, dependable revenue. So that being said, if Microsoft or the Federal Government ask them to limit things that cause their sensitive information to become leaked then VZW is going to do it...
(continues)
ronm999 said:
A while back I bought a V710 and found it crippled. As soon as my contract time was up, I left them for Tmobile. I for one voted with my dollars. Both of my daughters and their husbands also left Verizon for Tmobile and Cingular. We also moved my son (who still lives at home) from Verizon to Tmobile. When I left I also made sure to tell the rep why I was leaving. (He also gave me the security bull excuse.) This is the ONLY way Verizon will get the message. Otherwise they will continue to nickle and dime their customers to death. So quit bitching about it, and vote with your bucks.
So was the rep you s/w crying,begging.. You speak of nickel/dime was your child running your bill up and w...
(continues)
silentriot said:
Certainly one or two or ten thousand customers want OBEX transfers and to have all of the features that you've described fully unlocked. I don't for a second doubt that that number is closer to a hundred thousand nationwide.. ok.. five hundred forty eight thousand customers nationwide DEMAND the same things that you do. Alright.. So.. less than one percent of their customer base feels the same as you. Their Churn rate (the amount of customers who disconnect service) is 1.8% consistantly. BUT they add around 2 or 3 million customers per quarter. Customer's port in at a rate of 5 (or more) to 1 every single quarter.
Well written response, but I don't think you have any idea about the Blue...
(continues)
Verizon is not ignoring those numbers. The majority of verizon's handsets have bluetooth, though only with a headset profile. I can really only see it hurting them if they did not offer any at all. While even as an employee, I don't like GIN or it's prices, the revenue it creates for vzw has to be substantial. I am surprised other companies have not adopted similar models.
You are in the minority, russ...
(continues)
turbodeuce said:
28.5 mill what? phones or headsets? or combined? If it's phones I'd be interested in seeing how many of those consumers are actually using bluetooth.
Fair enough. Read this:
http://www.bluetooth.com/Bluetooth/Connect/ »
I'm not talking about wireless headsets at all. They're talking about the millions of OTHER devices that are shipping, that can be interoperable with cell phones.
Bluetooth technology is a common wireless feature found in products today. Bluetooth SIG is busy developing headsets, mobile phones, cars, printers, entertainment systems, synchronized calendars, appointment lists and computers with the technology integrated, and many more are also bringing new ideas to life ...
(continues)
You call Verizon's actions Communist yet YOU want to impose YOUR will on the majority for YOUR (and the minorities) benefit.
That is a key basis for socialism and communism.
"So that being said, if Microsoft or the Federal Government ask them to limit things that cause their sensitive information to become leaked then VZW is going to do it"
I have heard this argument before. If Uncle Sam or Bill demand something like this to use them, they should provide it for them and not lock all their customers into it...The contracts with these entities are certainly large enough to warrant special treatment.
Besides, I love the security argument here. If someone is capable of hacking into the system via wireless what makes anyone think the signal between the tower and the phone can't be hacked? Or the signal between the aircard in a laptop and the tower can't be hacked? It's an a...
(continues)
That's naive. All wireless connections are inherently not secure.
They aren't the best, but they are among the best. Just take a closer look at the maps. (Compare Home Coverage)
http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/CoverageLocatorCo ... »
Heather said:
It all depends on whare you are at. I know in Montana Cingular, t-mobile, and sprint say they have great coverage on their maps, but in reality almost everyone that moves up here end up changing and are mad because the maps are decieving. Up here the coverage with t-mobile, sprint, and cingular only covers major cities and highways. You can't even get a local number with them. I have had five customers get letters in the mail from Cingular telling them they have to swich from them because they were costing them too much money. The only two carriers that really work up here are Alltel and Verizon.
T-Mobile's map doesn't show great coverage in Montana. It shows roaming coverage along highways ...
(continues)
(continues)
The analog towers are going away but that is due to analog in the entire country will be going away which is more than a cell phone.. So please everyone who is so "unhappy" stop complaining, go try the other carrier, it is your right..If a large corporation is going to change things they will based on what is best, which is no different then where you probably work!
Yellowrose said:
So please everyone who is so "unhappy" stop complaining, go try the other carrier, it is your right..
In many markets Verizon has a monopoly, like a public utility, and consumers can't do it.
sidallen said:
name one market that Verizon is the only carrier.
Some parts of Vermont. Don't forget about data.
wnrussell said:sidallen said:
name one market that Verizon is the only carrier.
Some parts of Vermont. Don't forget about data.
Because the other carriers either do not have as good a coverage in Vermont or have not implemented data access on their network does not constitute a monopoly. It means they need to get off their ass and install it or improve their coverage. Verizon does not prevent them from having voice or data access, nor does Verizon own all the licenses for the area, that would be a monopoly. Look up the word first. The other companies have the ability but obviously aren't doing anything about it in that market. That's their own fault. There are GS...
(continues)
Yellowrose said:
I would not call having a "cell site" a monopoly, there is more than 1 carrier one can chose from.. just because one company has a cell site located in "a spot" would not constitue a monopoly.. Cell site locations, etc have to be approved by the FCC ... Paid for, etc. There is a reason cell sites are governed by the FCC, do not believe their reason would have to do with prefering one company vs another but there is way much more that plays into the positioning of a cell site..
Like the power and water companies?
There's no monopoly in cellular.
sangyup81 said:
Actually that's impossible. When the FCC first sold licences for Cellular Service, there was two companies in every market. Verizon wouldn't have been able to buy out the other carrier due to rules that would prevent them from doing so.
Well, they didn't!
wnrussell said:sangyup81 said:
Actually that's impossible. When the FCC first sold licences for Cellular Service, there was two companies in every market. Verizon wouldn't have been able to buy out the other carrier due to rules that would prevent them from doing so.
Well, they didn't!
Woohoo! Ignorance is bliss. Wish I could live in a fantasty world too. Wheeeeeeeeee! 🤣
tri-mode-only said:
and to make matters worse VZW has a cap on their unlimited Broadband which u pay $60 a month or $45 for pda... ONLY 5 GB a month if you go over it they terminate you... read the fine print... NO other carrier does that!
You might want to do a little bit of research.. First of unlimited Broadband is $59.99/month if using a wireless card.. If you are adding unlimited data to a calling plan, it is $44.99/month.. and yes if you use the service "illegally" and get caught you will be terminated.
I'm absolutely convinced that the majority of the people in this thread know about as much about the technologies being discussed as a turnip knows about astro-physics.
For the longest time I was thinking these guys were geeks, knew the technologies etc...Ehh, WRONG. These idiots think Bluetooth requires some sort of carrier service to work!
My god, this forum is full of END USERS trying to act like they know what the hell they are talking about!
Wow...
Tonight it finally occured to me that those bitching at me for having the nerve to bitch about something with VZW actually have zero understanding of the technology, so I'm pretty close to done.
renardlee said:
since you want more freedom and flexibility w/ ur phones, its time to switch to another carrier that can satisfy that need,
Why should you have to switch carriers? Doesn't a Bell Mobility E815 for example, work on the VZ carrier network?
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
ok this is from your original post:
sdgmcdon said:
lets see, yea $15/month for it! ... What? They are already paying $45/month for unlimited data? Well, if they want to use that data on a computer they will need to pay even more for it!...What do you say, none of the other wireless companies charge for tethering if the phone natively supports it?
In your last post:
sdgmcdon said:
$40 is cheaper than Verizons $45 + $15
You obviously like ignoring parts of my posts (the parts that prove you wrong)... I already conceded that Verizon is more expensive then Sprint for teth...
(continues)
turbodeuce said:
What features do they specifically disable?
The biggest disabled feature is the ability to transfer pictures, video, etc from phone to phone or from phone to PC. You also can't make your own mp3 ringtones on most phones. Bitpim will let you around that, though (in most cases).
Those are the only ones that I know of. Am I missing any? I'm a bit hungover from monday night football last night 😎
rwilliams said:turbodeuce said:
What features do they specifically disable?
The biggest disabled feature is the ability to transfer pictures, video, etc from phone to phone or from phone to PC. You also can't make your own mp3 ringtones on most phones. Bitpim will let you around that, though (in most cases).
Those are the only ones that I know of. Am I missing any? I'm a bit hungover from monday night football last night 😎
Contact transfer from phone to car and from PC to phone.
(continues)
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
or are you ignoring me cause I proved you wrong?
craptacularwireless said:
Verizon Direct and Indirect Sales associates: please ask every customer who comes into your store today if they know what Bluetooth is. Then ask them if they know what Bluetooth can do. I guarantee that the number of people who know what Bluetooth is will be small. And even smaller still will be the number of people who know what the full capabilities of BlueTooth are.
who gives a fu(k if a bunch of tards don't know what it is, that doesn't mean sh*t! The point is verizon jacks over the phone
You know if all companies worked on that premise the world would be a much different place, and not for the better.
Get a clue
I just feel like you are wasting your breath, and its unfortunate too because the one person with the voice of reason behind them, is the one getting ripped.
https://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&f ... »
or are you ignoring me cause I proved you wrong???
aavera said:
...I would say that at least three quarters or more of the people ask what [Bluetooth] is/what it does and after we tell them, the majority ask why anyone would need it!
Unless they are one of the 28 million people who already have another BT device to pair with, or intend to get one.
That's the kicker. "My next car or computer will be Bluetooth. What Bluetooth cell phones do you have today?"
When they get the next BT device and they are locked into a 2 year contract... you know the rest of that story.
This may be an example of the types of people each provider is attracting with phone features.
ralph_on_me said:
Most of my customers know what Bluetooth is, but when someone doesn't and I tell them what it's capable of most of them say "wow".
Check this out:
http://www.garmin.com/products/nuvi360/ »
Navigator. Translator. Entertainer. Tour Guide. Garmin’s nüvi™ 360 is one versatile little GPS. This pocket-sized Personal Travel Assistant now comes with hands-free Bluetooth® wireless technology in addition to the popular features offered in the nüvi 350 — making it the go-anywhere travel companion.
wfine81 said:
I post that late when Im drunk and bored, cant always go tou partying during the week, and most everybody I know is asleep at that time, so I come here to shoot the sh*t
🤣 Good one wine! Plus not to mention, some work til midnight! Everyone in the world don't necessarily have 8-5 jobs, Mon thru Fri!
First lets establish some baseline values here:
Verizon = V
Sprint = S
Bluetooth=bt
VZW Coverage = VsubC
VsubC >Tmobile coverage
VsubC >Cingular coverage
VsubC >Sprint coverage
Vd= unlimited data on a pda =$45
Vt= tethering on a pda =$15
Vd+Vt=$60
Since the value of Sprint's data services were not listed here, we will assume, for asshattery purposes, that Sd + St =$0
So Vd+Vt > Sd+St
So clearly, the value of Vd+Vt is greater than Sprint... ;-)
Now if we extrapolate further, we can see that VsubC + Vd+Vt > SsubC + Sd + St
So what's the problem?
********************************************* **
Maybe somebody with real math sk...
(continues)
2(Vd^3+Vt^2)(3Vd^2+2Vt) (when simplified)
F'(X) = you have way too much time on your hands!
TenuredVZWrep said:
The more revenue VZW makes, the more they can invest in the network. i.e. expand coverage, prevent capacity issues. If your ever in an emergency in Bucksnort, TN.. do you want to call 911 or do you want to transfer files via bluetooth?
I would like to have BOTH. I would like to transfer my contacts to my car via Bluetooth so I can have a safe hands free car phone.
That way I will have less chance of needing to call 911 in Bucksnort, TN because I had an accident caused by using my cell phone while driving.
Why don't they just add OBEX to Backup Assistant and get it over with?
I have been to Texas.. wasnt very impressive.
Tennessee was MUCH nicer.
I had to pick the lesser of the 2 evils 😢
OH YEAH...There is the fact that Kerry was on the Senate Intelligence Committee, the same group that gets the same CIA briefing that the President gets, but if Kerry would have attended the meetings that he missed over 60% of the time, then maybe he wouldn't have been "MISLED" into war.
out of those 77 senators were: John Kerry, John Edwards, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer,etc...all the big names of the senate. Ted Kennedy voted against it of course, but he doesn't have much room to speak since he left a girl to drown in a car th...
(continues)
Steve Martin
Dwight D. Eisenhower (President)
Admiral Chester Nimitz (Commander of the Pacific Fleet WWII)
Vince Young
Howard Hughes
The guys that made Dell
The guys that made Texas Instruments
The Dallas Cowboys
The Maveric, Spurs, and Rockets
Dan Rather
...
and the list goes on. Remember, some slightly famous people from Tennessee came down to Texas to help them fight for Independence, mainly because they saw that Tennessee was dead in the water and Texas was the place to be.
try and match this statement..."I wasn't born here but I got here as quick as I could"
but Ya...
(continues)
yeahright said:
works for me, don't think wfine will be liking that to much though 🤣
I could care less, they are crooked as hell and only out for their own gain