Home  ›  News  ›

Leap Seeking Buyer

Article Comments  

all discussions

show all 10 replies

US Cellular should snap em up!

markj73

Feb 1, 2010, 5:19 PM
This would expand US Cellulars coverage to major/semi major cities, saves them some roaming charges 🙂

Why would Metro PcS want them? I dont even know where they cover, but just seems pointless...

AT&T/Verizon/Sprint or Tmo should NOT bother, too much overlap im sure!
...
Azeron

Feb 1, 2010, 8:35 PM
I seriously doubt AT&T or VZW would be allowed to grab Leap under a Democratic regime.
...
AndroidRules

Feb 1, 2010, 8:57 PM
Azeron said:
I seriously doubt AT&T or VZW would be allowed to grab Leap under a Democratic regime.


True but I dont want U.S. Cellular to either. Not in their best interest. The only logical choice is Metro
...
Azeron

Feb 1, 2010, 9:29 PM
These guys turned Metro down before...
...
AndroidRules

Feb 1, 2010, 11:00 PM
Azeron said:
These guys turned Metro down before...


Yeah I know thats why I saying for Metro to up the offer lmao 😛
...
Jayshmay

Feb 1, 2010, 11:53 PM
Ah, we ALL agree Metro should be them, and do away with that stupid-a$$ name "cricket"!
...
AndroidRules

Feb 2, 2010, 12:37 PM
Jayshmay said:
Ah, we ALL agree Metro should be them, and do away with that stupid-a$$ name "cricket"!


Hell yeah. What kind of a efin name is Cricket for a wireless carrier anyway? This ain't Europe lol
...
phonenerd24

Feb 2, 2010, 2:20 AM
it would be nice for us cellular to get all these new areas but from a business standpoint, you are picking up a Large around of consumers that quite frankly us cellular cannot support.

Us cellular cannot match the cricket price plans, so everyone would be converted to a new plan that costs more which would make everyone run.

i see the beneficial side of gaining more coverage but dont see how the bottom line consumer growth would happen.
...
dave73

Feb 2, 2010, 5:32 PM
phonenerd24 said:
it would be nice for us cellular to get all these new areas but from a business standpoint, you are picking up a Large around of consumers that quite frankly us cellular cannot support.

Us cellular cannot match the cricket price plans, so everyone would be converted to a new plan that costs more which would make everyone run.

i see the beneficial side of gaining more coverage but dont see how the bottom line consumer growth would happen.


If US Cellular did acquire Cricket, Cricket users aren't in contract, and USCC could change the terms. Having extra spectrum for Chicago (a market where USCC only holds 20mhz in PCS), along with some additional markets. There is some overlap, but ...
(continues)
...
SPCSVZWJeff

Feb 3, 2010, 12:34 AM
It may be a good thing for U.S. Cellular in some regions but it could also create problems with isolated markets. One of Cricket's big problems is that they are a company of islands. This means that their customers often leave them because of a lack of service in adjacent markets.
it would make much more sense for Metro to buy them.
...
dave73

Feb 3, 2010, 1:53 AM
Cricket hold 2 regional AWS licenses (Great Lakes D Block & Central E block), and USCC holds the Regional AWS Mississippi Valley E block. USCC could do some serious expansion with those 3 licenses if they really wanted to. If Metro doesn't get them, USCC would be a better choice. Metro is still the best carrier to acquire Cricket since both carriers are no contract carriers, and have little overlap.

If the FCC & DOJ allowed Cricket to be acquired by the big 2, the only way it would be allowed is by having some PCS spectrum divested, since Cricket holds 2 AWS regional licenses (Great Lakes D & Central E). The other possibility would be to have the AWS regional licenses divested (possibly some smaller AWS licenses as well). I still h...
(continues)
...

This forum is closed.

Please log in to report a message to the moderator.

This forum is closed.


all discussions

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Threads Follow @phonescoop on Mastodon Phone Scoop on Facebook Follow on Instagram

 

Playwire

All content Copyright 2001-2024 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.