Home  ›  News  ›

EV-DO Revision B Standard Finalized

Article Comments  

all discussions

show all 11 replies

73.5 Mbps Super-Channel?!?

SystemShock

Nov 16, 2005, 5:50 PM
Why in the world would I need that? Am I a supercomputer tryin' to take over the world? 😳
...
muchdrama

Nov 16, 2005, 6:05 PM
SystemShock said:
Why in the world would I need that? Am I a supercomputer tryin' to take over the world? 😳


I agree.

"The CDG is touting download speeds of 73.5 Mbps and uploads of 27 Mbps if a carrier could join 15 channels into a 20 MHz super channel, however it is unlikely any network could afford to dedicate such bandwidth to a single connection."

Then why mention it in the first place? Pfft.
...
ImmerStark

Nov 16, 2005, 6:17 PM
a single user may rarely be allocated that bandwith, but having the ability to offer scalable bandwith is nice. it increases efficinecy if you can share any ammount of available bandwith among all the users.
...
muchdrama

Nov 17, 2005, 1:59 PM
ImmerStark said:
a single user may rarely be allocated that bandwith, but having the ability to offer scalable bandwith is nice. it increases efficinecy if you can share any ammount of available bandwith among all the users.


I think it's a question of "How much bandwidth is enough?". Or even "How much speed do we need?".
...
djdelay

Nov 17, 2005, 9:09 PM
muchdrama said:
How much speed do we need?



that's a loaded question right there.......depends what kind of party you're in for I guess. 😉
...
eric Lin

Nov 16, 2005, 10:56 PM
actually, we mentioned the 20 MHz superchannel for just that reason. when you see Rev. B described elsewhere, all you'll see is talk of the superchannel, because it sounds so, well, super. so we wanted you to know about it, so that you didn't come back saying "i heard it was capable of 75 Mbps, what's this talk of less than 5 Mbps." this way when you read about it elsewhere, you'll read about that superchannel and its high data speeds and know maybe it's not the big deal those stories are making it out to be.
...
muchdrama

Nov 17, 2005, 2:01 PM
eric Lin said:
actually, we mentioned the 20 MHz superchannel for just that reason. when you see Rev. B described elsewhere, all you'll see is talk of the superchannel, because it sounds so, well, super. so we wanted you to know about it, so that you didn't come back saying "i heard it was capable of 75 Mbps, what's this talk of less than 5 Mbps." this way when you read about it elsewhere, you'll read about that superchannel and its high data speeds and know maybe it's not the big deal those stories are making it out to be.


Don't get me wrong, Eric. I like getting any info on any emerging technology. Some of these speed promises seem ridiculous, though.
...
evilbstrd666

Nov 17, 2005, 10:38 AM
Because some nerd can do it.
...
muchdrama

Nov 17, 2005, 2:03 PM
evilbstrd666 said:
Because some nerd can do it.


Without Nerds where would we be? Besides, I was a nerd in high school...I, uh, just wasn't a smart nerd (only semi-intelligent).
...
evilbstrd666

Nov 17, 2005, 10:37 AM
No, just need your phone porn in an extreme hurry.
...
SystemShock

Nov 17, 2005, 5:30 PM
evilbstrd666 said:
No, just need your phone porn in an extreme hurry.


😳
😁
🤣
...
nextel18

Nov 18, 2005, 11:09 AM
many people/companies might not need it, but it is good that it is there.

reason right here "however it is unlikely any network could afford to dedicate such bandwidth to a single connection".
...

This forum is closed.

Please log in to report a message to the moderator.

This forum is closed.


all discussions

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Threads Follow @phonescoop on Mastodon Phone Scoop on Facebook Follow on Instagram

 

Playwire

All content Copyright 2001-2024 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.