User: cainthecavebear
These are the most recent forum messages posted by cainthecavebear:
Re: Politics
Am I supposed to be impressed that a "conservative" used a liberal newspaper to bolster his own socialistic opinion?
Im not.
Im not impressed with your so called intellect, your debate tactics, or your constant need to force your opinion on others.
And I see that you completely ignored the article I posted and instead decided to use ad hominem attacks.
It is okay though. I reposted it and several others for you in another post. Take you meds and have a ...
Re: Just FYI, bluecoyote is on both sides of the issue
So here you are rallying against net neutrality:
https://www.phonescoop.com/art icles/discuss.php?fm=m&ff=15277&fi=3286477
Yet here you sit claiming the opposite position. Do you have anything better to do than troll a forum looking for a fight? Or is that the entire endgame?
You and Zpike should form a group.
Re: Sorry I missed this
Funny. You have been stalking me since Ive been on this forum. More classic projection from your disturbed mind.
Oh and I never said that Soros masterminded net neutrality. That is just more of your lunacy shining through because you are incapabke of using ligic and reason. I have already posted several links from several reputable news agencies detailing the situation, but I doubt you have the capacity to read anything that doesn't worship socialism.
But since you are too ...
Re: More "facts" eh?
Fact: Zpike created a fake account of me and trolled the forums pretending to miss Zpike. And responded to his own fake account be cause I had completely ignored him.
Fact: This was AFTER we had both agreed not to talk to each other. He then had to get "one last post" in and he summarily ignored.
Fact: Weeks later Zpike began trolling cainthecavebear again without provocation breaking his agreement that he would not post to cainthecavebear.
I ignored you for a ...
Re: oh by the way...
Feel free to let us know which Libertarians and Constitution Party members support this Net Neutrality FCC garbage.
You can't.
Have a nice day Mrs Clinton.
Re: Sorry I missed this
So...ummmm....
Boingboing.net is your smoking gun?
Lol :lol:
Re: I don't get it...
Again...you think I give a rat's behind about your opinion, you delusions, or how easy you will rest.
Please check yourself in somewhere before you get caught pretending to be me again.
Re: I don't get it...
You keep acting as tho you are my equal and deserve some sort of respect. Keep dreaming socialist fan boy.
Re: Reply
You probably offended their political beliefs which is what I believe led to them deleting my comment.
Some wishful thinking going on in here...
Before you guys get too far into your socialist panty parade...
1. SCOTUS will most likely kill this. They have killed every similar attempt. It doesn't really matter how the FCC justifies their grab, the fact is that the internet is soley about information. Government has no legal authority to control that information or speech.
My prediction is a SCOTUS overturn of these regulations by a vote of 5-4.
2. A Republican President is coming. Even hardcore Dems recognize this. Just going ...
Re: Finally....the American consumer wins, GREAT DAY!!!
So... you don't support the idea of fulfilling a contract?
I have no doubt that if AT&T decided mid-contract that text messages are no longer included would be met with cries for government intervention and lawsuits to hold the accountable for the contracts.
So why is it an individual should not be held to that same standard. If you do not like the idea of arbitration you can choose someone else... or just sue them anyway. If you have a legal ...
Re: I'm neither wrong nor a liar.
Show us your "facts". You claim Im a liar and wrong... you claim you have done your fact checking.
Cite your source(s) please.
FYI...
Any response not containing the requested sources of YOUR facts will be taken as an admission that YOU are the one who is wrong and/or a liar.
Re: Finally....the American consumer wins, GREAT DAY!!!
No. The agony of this debate is simple. One group of people think they have the right to take from another group. Those people are the reason we have the 2nd amendment.
Re: I don't get it...
Conversely...
It was never an issue until some busy bodies decided we had to "fix" the internet.
Re: Just FYI, THE FCC WAS PAID OFF TOO
In the very article you linked to...
"It's no big surprise that corporations throw their monetary weight around. But it is especially worrying when the FCC is already cozy with the very industry it's supposed to regulate. Who, in turn, is supposed to make sure the FCC does its job? Why, that's your elected officials of the Senate Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet and the House Subcommittee on Communications and Technology—almost all of whom have received campaign ...
Re: Check your facts, I did, you didn't LMAO
It's sad that you think you are "winning".
Not only have you lost rights according to this new takeover, you are cheerleading the effort based on your shallow knowledge of your own political persuasion.
Furthermore, neo nazis are, like their predecessors, Socialists not fascists like you are trying to compare liberty loving officials to...
Cearly, the only "brainwashing" or "paying off" is from the left leaning socialist elitist crowds. It has been well documented.
The neo marxist propaganda/funding machine behind "net neutrality" ...
Re: I don't get it...
According to the commissioners who oppose it, that is exactly what this does...and Wheeler STILL won't release the details of the new regulations. So I will take the word of people telling us what's going on instead of the word of people trying to hide stuff from us.
Re: I don't get it...
As usual, his "evidence" is anectdotal at best. He uses general vague terms and can't back up what he says. Don't expect him to respond...
And yeah, Ive pointed out several times advertised speeds are ALWAY "up to X megs". Only a clown would think that the FCC is going to gurantee a speed.
DEAR OVERZEALOUS MODERATORS
Outside of communist China, the word "dingleberry" is not now nor has it ever been a censorable word. Please do your best to promote a free exchange of ideas outside of your own preconceived notion of morality. If my kid's kindergarten teacher doesn't censor the word, you probably shouldn't either.
Re: Finally....the American consumer wins, GREAT DAY!!!
Please show us examples of these atrocities that actually exist OUTSIDE of your imagination.
Re: Finally....the American consumer wins, GREAT DAY!!!
No. They were not being extorted. Go ahead and hit that google yourself. They opposed net neutrality when they WANTED to pay for that fast lane.
Re: wtf?
Yeah. The fact is that PRO net neutrality groups were the ones who were being funded by the elite 1%
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/soros -ford-shovel-196-million-to-net-neutrality-gr oups-staff-to-white-house/article/2560702
Re: I don't get it...
Show me something other than a lame talking point from a socialist crony that agrees with what you are saying.
Re: Politics
Zpike said:
>>"Most companies" did not ask for this.
Many internet companies actually do support this. Google and Netflix come to mind.
Yes. I'm sure those companies DO "come to mind". Especially considering that those two companies were opposed to "net neutrality" up until LATE 2014 when they suddenly switched positions. Even Google was opposed until Tom Wheeler agreed to some "tweeks" literally one day before the vote. Sounds like those "evil corporations" you cry about actually made some back ...
Re: I don't get it...
Yeah... And without government we wouldn't have roads either. What a bunch of socialist horse crap. Still pretending to be "conservative", Mr Stalin?
Re: Shouldnt Common Carrier mean...
Yes and then Comcast could legally close it's doors and its networks ending service for millions of customers. Good idea.
Re: Finally....the American consumer wins, GREAT DAY!!!
It's political because you have paid liars claiming to save us from something that doesn't exist.
And it is sad because you have non-paid nitwits promoting this agenda so they can feel important.
This is on par with black americans who vote for the party that promoted slavery for 200 years and still promotes abortion which targets low income black families.
So, consider yourself a traitor to your own cause, Mr Sharpton. Too bad you did not get paid ...
Re: Politics
Well, 1st, because what you said us a blatant lie. "Most companies" did not ask for this. Neither did the citezenry.
2nd, the architect of these rules is a george soros funded socialist with the expressed goal of killing capitamism and speech that promotes it. So there ya go.
Re: Horse Crap
"The Founding Fathers had no idea that someday giant corporations would be running this country. Corporations didn't even exist in their time."
Complete and utter garbage.
They knew that exactly this would happen. They knew it and wrote about it often. Their answer was to give the Federal government VERY limited powers so there would be no motive to take it over. This is also the exact reason most of the Founders were against centralized banking and why the very existence ...
Re: Oh sure...
Notice the strategy here...
Ask for a reasonable explanation of this radical new change enforced by a government entity that has been illegally influenced by the White House Administration, and you are referred to as a "foot stomper".
Same tactic used by Pelosi and the Socialist Scum who passed ObamaCare: "We have to pass the bill before we can see what's in it".
Make no mistake. This is government hostile takeover of the internet at the demand of the ...
LMAO!!!
All I heard was:
"Because of our shoddy services and terrible customer service experiences, we are not as profitable as our competitors. Therefore, we need the government to bail us out and help us compete".
Re: Wow
Man. There is just no way that guy isn't an aspiring socialist politician or an insane mental patient. We could have a photo of him with his hand in the cookie jar and he would say "Hardly. You haven't provided any evidence".
Denial isn't a river in Egypt. Lol.
Re: You answered your own question
You keep making this about politicians because they are corrupt, but then ask those politicians to fix the problem.
I just don't think we need an oversight committee or regulatory board so you can understand the term "up to" as in "up to 50 megs". How about a "citizen oversight committee"? How about instead of enforcing monopolies, we let competition run rampant? So you hate company x because they give you crappy service. Instead of promoting more competition by ...
Re: Told Ya So
Just for reference... It took all of 5 minutes to look through articles about net neutrality to find some "told ya so's".
This one article alone is full of them.
https://www.phonescoop.com/articles/ discuss.php?fm=m&ff=14877&fi=3284600
https ://www.phonescoop.com/articles/discuss.php?fm =m&ff=14877&fi=3284685
https://www.phonesc oop.com/articles/discuss.php?fm=m&ff=14877&fi =3284606
https://www.phonescoop.com/articl es/discuss.php?fm=m&ff=14877&fi=3284607
https://www.phonescoop.com/articles/discuss.p hp?fm=m&ff=14877&fi=3284623
Socialists crack me up!
Not only do they never keep their promises or tell the truth about their intentions, they have the gall to DEMAND that you treat them with the utmost respect no matter how deviant their own behavior is. You must follow a set of rules they will never follow. You must debate them on their terms and they are insanely demanding when they do not get what they want. Socialism is now and always has been a crutch for weak ...
Does anyone else...
...hear the sad desperation of broken promises echoed across the wind? :twisted:
Maybe someone will put on a pair of my old undies and prance around pretending to be me again. :lol:
Re: No, you didn't
https://www.phonescoop.com/articles/discuss.p hp?fm=m&ff=15094&fi=3285964
https://ww w.phonescoop.com/articles/discuss.php?fm=m&ff =15094&fi=3285965
Re: Communications Act of 1934 lol
http://www.spectacle.org/896/mistake.html
"The Communications Act of 1934 was a mistake that we have lived with for sixty years. It is time to recognize it for what it is: a substantial assault on the freedom of speech which has haunted us for most of the twentieth century; the Communications Decency Act, which the '34 Act carries piggyback, seeks to extend that profound harm into the 21st century."
Communications Act of 1934 lol
Can we come up with some other meaningless buzz word designed to make someone seem smarter than they are? I keep seeing this used as some sort of symbol of government perfection like just by invoking those words, it makes socialism acceptable.
Let's not forget that the Act was designed, written and passed by arguably the most socialist left leaning group of law makers the US has ever seen. The legislation was modeled after similar takeover laws in Germany and ...
Re: No, you didn't
I guess he is ignoring the fact that you and several other people told him exactly what this was and exactly how it would be played out. :lol:
(older messages not shown)
