User: Joshmo
These are the most recent forum messages posted by Joshmo:
Re: Shocking...
I'd also like to add you'd be getting an extra gig of data, with rollover data apparently, and upping your minutes from $700 to unlimited.
Re: Shocking...
netboy said:
please tell me how i save money with non-contract option.
i have a old family plan with 3 lines,
only 1st line has 2GB data plan, the other 2 lines is just for calls.
i pay average about 110$-120$ a month.
i getting Galaxy S6 Edge (64GB) at 399 with contract.
will be getting Iphone6S at 199$ with contract
will be getting Note5 at 299$ with contract.
Please tell me how i save money when i pay FULL PRICE for Galaxy S6 Edge, iphone6S ...
that's cool and all...
but what about the secret superduper cookies they use?
Re: There You Have It
cainthecavebear said:
10 years ago, you would have never seen me go anywhere near Verizon. Now, I'm sold.
Sold as in, they paid you to post that?
Re: A one-horse review?
-100
"I just want a device that does email well, and everything else terrible."
-Every blackberry fan ever.
Re: Oh Gee, Can't monopolize in the US so lets change countries.
rwalford79 said:
People seem to understand that in many areas AT&T is a monopoly, in others Verizon is, both in landline and/or mobile service.
What they don't fully grasp is that both Verizon and AT&T having the most customers does not make them a monopoly where both compete in the same markets (in no market do they compete landline, but they do for mobile) but it makes them a duopoly, in that both control majority of all customers both landline ...
Re: What's the point?
The Victor said:
cant do that with at&t, if you have verizon you can, not sure about the other 2
no, you can. I've already upgraded twice since their NEXT program has been out.
Re: What's the point?
if you're on the next 24, and lets say your phone costs 5 bucks a month, and you want to upgrade after a year, you just pay the difference of what month your on, and then 24th month. (in this example it's 12, so 12 months times 5 bucks = $60)
Re: So what about Google?
Jellz said:
When they owned Motorola, wouldn't that mean Google was then in direct competition with all the manufacturers making Android phones? Under that same logic, it seems so.
Samsung's first name must be Joseph because they're Stalin paying microsoft the money they owe them.
Re: This, basically, sucks...
simple enough...I just wont shop at those places.
Re: Bogus coverage maps
dougm said:
About a month or two ago, AT&T changed their coverage viewer on their website. You used to be able to select Voice coverage and get a street-level depiction of their coverage, with a scale of poor, fair, good, and excellent coverage strength. Now, their maps are a binary depiction of coverage, either there's coverage or no coverage.
In many areas, 4G LTE is stated on the maps, but I have experienced 2G coverage.
AT&T is just as bad as ...
Re: Love the idea!
aeternavi said:
Why is it though that all the good stuff comes from the carrier with the smallest footprint? I really wish they were in my area. They come out with some great ideas and then the other three lemmings of carriers follow suit months later. One day, perhaps the others will get a lightbulb going off in their head.
Net neutrality out the window
Re: Wow this stinks
Slammer said:
---"You only think you like AT&T because you're not wise like John."---
I'm not sure of anywhere in my post that B-sides should hate AT&T. Please review my thread and point out where I claim that B-sides needs to hate AT&T personally. I believe I said having AT&T and DirecTV as seperate entities was not a bad thing. Having them merge is not in the best interest of the consumers. B-sides likes both and the reason is that both ...
Re: Wow this stinks
B-Sides said:
John I've been reading your "Conspiracy theory" crap for months now, are you ever satisfied with anything?
John goes to the pump "Damn Exxon!
John goes to the supermarket "$3.95 for Coco Crispies, LUDICROUS!!!"
John goes to church "What? Donations???"
John goes to bed "Hey baby how about a nightcap?" "WHAT! $1.99 a minute? BLASPHEMY!
I've had ALL 4 major carriers since 97', for my money AT&T works the best and gives me what I want, VALUE and QUALITY! You can ...
Re: Wow this stinks
B-Sides said:
I have both AT&T and Directv and from my experience they both have great customer service! I am stoked for this deal as I believe AT&T is going to take their service to the next level with offering and packages!
Yeah I'm pretty excited. DirecTV is pretty awesome, but Uverse with the channel line up and pricing is a better deal. If they can take what wins with Uverse and put it to DirecTV then I'm sure ...
Re: There We Have It.
Slammer said:
If this deal goes through, AT&T will be the largest pay tv provider in the world.
John B.
While they'll be very large, Comcast is will still be larger.
Re: This has gone way too far.
smcgarvey6 said:
I for one would rather see directv stay a separate entity from any company. The only reason at&t wants to buy them is because they are losing home phone, broadband and pay tv customers. This just gives them another way to raise prices. I hope the FCC and the DOJ steps in and blocks them.
except as a trend, prices have fallen.
Re: This has gone way too far.
Slammer said:
Yes. Because shifting the folcrum point to a more even balance is better for healthier choice and pricing. The problem is, even having strong parent companies, Tmobile and Sprint still have limited funded parents as compared to Verizon and AT&T.
However, it is my hope that acquistions or merges are kept to minimalistic numbers and that AT&T and Verizon are kept at bay to use innovation rather than just purchase entities that others built.
John B.
Ahhh yes...So It's okay for ...
Re: This is why
OmegaWolf747 said:
It's due to deregulation that these large monopolies grew. We need to break up the large companies and then regulate them so they can't grow any larger.
I couldn't agree with you more. Lets bring back roaming when I go out of state!
Re: YAY
tjobrien21 said:
It may not be such a good thing. I have had AT&T wireless and landline in the past, and some of my customers are stuck with their data service for their offices.
In all cases, the customer service has been horrible, so if DirectTV ever provided good customer service, that'll be a fond memory.
Customer service doesn't matter... Til you need it.
http://www.cnet.com/news/at-t-wins-j-d -power-honors-for-customer-buying-experience/
http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=245 83&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=36786&mapcode=
Re: It appears
They offer good products, and I'm okay with them preloading it on android, just as apple preloads their stuff on the iPhone.
What I feel is antitrust behavior from google is them blocking youtube access from Microsoft.
Comcast wont let this happen.....
They will throw any amount of money they have to at Washington to get this blocked.
Re: YAY
B-Sides said:
I'm pretty sure that AT&T just finished 1st in customer service (JD Power). I have both AT&T and Directtv and in my opinion they both have excellent customer service!
This. I have them for Uverse and cellular and it's been nothing but a dream compared to my old provider (WoW, and *Verizon)
*I acknowledge I've not had Verizon in years, but everytime I went into their store the reps acted like they didn't need or want my business and ...
Re: You must be trolling
hyperbole.
1. Yes
2. If content providers pay for access, then the consumer gets access to it without using any of their data.
3. This is just purely made up.
Funny...
The apple store used to always blame that on the case. If you had any case on it that wasn't sold by apple then it was the cases fault and they wouldn't do anything to help you.
Re: The Bell System forever lives.
Slammer said:
Sprint and Tmobile are not allowed to form a third power to create viable competition for the former bells of AT&T and VZW, yet the two largest can continuously swallow up the smaller carriers putting them in an unfair advantage for the other less wealthy carriers.
The same Bell system broken up due to a monopoly. Hail to the FCC and DoJ for retaining the cartel and control over the industry and allowing them to have a family ...
Re: Wrong
phonetekmek said:
Verizon and Sprint customers are used to having that ability only on wifi so it is not really that big of a deal. But the commercial told you it was so I understand why you can't live without it.
Ahh yeah, I forgot you non-At&t guys were used to 3rd rate services anyway.
Re: Wrong
honestly it's one of those things that I do all the time without thinking about it.
I'm not sure how you guys function without it.
Re: Good for T-mo
lol...yeah I remember those ads.
AT&T got so butthurt over those ads they hired Luke Wilson.
but really Verizon was full of it. Their 3G network was nothing to brag about. In most places during the roll out it was barely faster than Edge.
Re: Good for T-mo
I'm not sure about their new commerical but they got around that with the old one it had a tiny disclaimer at the bottom that said "Competitors maps from 01/13" While Verizon's maps were their updated ones.
And this was during the holiday season that I saw that.
Re: Enemy of my Enemy saying
It's a dumb saying for sure but all that garbage from the new star trek movie is all false.
It not a saying that was coined by an Arabian Prince, especially that one that didn't lose his head by his best friend.
I wonder if there is a partnership in the works....
First this and now BBM is coming to the Lumia line...
hmmmm
Re: Dang
newfoneguy said:
Anyone happen to know when the nokia windows contract is up?
Nokia was purchased by Microsoft, so probably never.
Re: what?? it' for STUPID people!
That's not a shocker though. T-mobile has always and will probably always be less than AT&T. They charge less per month not because they're some unsung hero for the consumer...but because they can't.
If AT&T and T-mobile cost the same per month, then nobody would be with T-mobile because their coverage isn't as good.
(I'm not saying it's garbage coverage btw, they are doing a good job of increasing their nationwide footprint...but they're still not as big ...
Re: of course they should sue...
kinda grasping at straws...
purple isn't the same color as pink. It's not even similarly close to tmo's logo.
Re: of course they should sue...
lol, everyone look at the Tmobile Shill.
Re: I actually wanted the engraving on it...
I don't understand why they said they would do it, if they wasn't for sure if they even could or not.
Re: The Solution is Obvious
Actually both apps that microsoft turned out (facebook and youtube) were really really good.
Re: BS
T Bone said:
And it looks like Google is also revoking the Android developer license from any Android developer who submits an app for Windows Phone.....
Google really is turning evil.....Google is becoming what Microsoft was back in the 'bad old days'
Dont get me wrong, I think the whole youtube app drama is bull, but what you're saying doesn't sound factual. Where did you see that?
Re: AT&T just doesn't get it, do they?
Jarahawk said:
No. AT&T. You will NOT be allowed to swallow up yet another small fry. Request denied.
Turns out AT&T just revoked their offer. Something about upsetting some guy on some board who didn't matter to them at all.
(older messages not shown)
