Phone Scoop

printed December 22, 2014
See this page online at:
http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/p_forum.php?fm=m&ff=4058&fi=3244742

Home  ›  Phones  ›  Samsung  ›

Samsung Galaxy S 4 (GSM)

 

Info Photos Reviews  20 News Forum  

Back to message list

Top message:  No AWS HSPA? by terryjohnson16   Mar 15, 2013, 8:54 AM

Replying to:  Re: No AWS HSPA? by OlemanGSM   Mar 21, 2013, 10:05 AM

Re: No AWS HSPA?

by WiWavelength    Mar 21, 2013, 10:16 AM

OlemanGSM said:
Nice conversation, but as for penetration qualities 1700mhz does a better job than 1900 and thats why is makes more sense for tmobile to release LTE on it first...


Not quite. The "1700 MHz" convention is something that Phone Scoop and other outlets have used to refer to AWS, and it is problematic for the many who do not know wireless spectrum very well.

The proper nomenclature should be AWS 2100+1700 MHz because the downlink is in the 2100 MHz range, the uplink in the 1700 MHz range.

So, AWS 2100+1700 MHz is a mixed bag. Yes, compared to PCS 1900 MHz, the AWS 1700 MHz uplink has a slight propagation advantage, but the AWS 2100 MHz downlink is at a slight propagation disadvantage. And if the downlink drops due to propagation issues, the uplink is rendered irrelevant.

Thus, empirical experience suggests that AWS 2100+1700 MHz, propagation wise, is mildly inferior to PCS 1900 MHz. The advantage that AWS 2100+1700 MHz offers is more open and available spectrum.

AJ

Report to moderator

Replies

No replies to this message


Reply You must log in to reply.

Back to message list

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Twitter Phone Scoop on Facebook Phone Scoop on Google+ Subscribe to Phone Scoop on YouTube Follow on Instagram

 

All content Copyright 2001-2014 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.
2