Samsung Galaxy S II / SGH-i777
Speed vs Thrill
The thrill has dual core AND dual channel but 1.0ghz... which will be faster/smoother?...
...
I have Thrill & if u run Quadrant Thrill has a more smoother thruput versus my old Moto Atrix & the Thrill is about 10% faster than Atrix on Quadrant & Smartbench. On Linpack Atrix 44MFLOPS LG Thrill 70MFLOPS. Also a more consistant FPS. Also a lot brighter screen than my old Moto Atrix. Can only get about 7 hrs out of batt, with moderate use. Moto Atris was about 8, same as SII is suppose to b. On Quadrant the only unit that had a little faster gaming speed was an LG Star. Thrill was almost 2900, SII were only 2438, with 1.5GHz processor. 😎 So Thrill's batt was about an hour less & is a little over an ounce heavier. However the 3D vids & pics are very nice. And for $49.99 @ Costco, heck of a buy for the product. Pretty classy looking phon...
(continues)
(continues)
...
Thanks a lot, but just to clarify, you ran quadrant on a gs2 with a 1.5 dual core? or the 1.2 dual core version? Im looking at ATTs 1.2 version, which will be even slower then??? hhhmmm... 🤨
...
When u run Thrill or Atrix on Smartbench, it shows results of other phones, which included GSII with various processor speeds. 1.2 - 1.5, n all cases the gaming score on any was between 2350-2438, while LG Thrill, Star & Optimus hovered around 2800 - 2917, on gaming score. Now the productivity score on GSII with 1.2 was 3861-4088. Thrill was around 2800. So GSII was faster on productivity & slower on Gaming. 😎 Sorry about Smartbench versus Quadrant.
...
