Techs & Trends
Over time Iâ€™ve heard and read the Moto E815 is the reception king, but itâ€™s not listed on the top 10 list.
Not to get side tracked though, Higher RF = better reception?
http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6602_7-5020357-1.html?t ... »
First, RF output (transmit) is only one half of the RF signal performance equation, with reception being the other half. Both are important.
Secondly, if higher power automatically meant better performance, all phones would be designed to operate at the maximum legal limit. That's not the case.
Engineering a phone for optimal signal (RF) performance is extremely complex. It's not just output power or reception gain. Dozens (if not hundreds) of factors affect the signal performance of a particular phone, on a particular network, in a particular location, in a particular situation.
no way I'm arguing about the best reception phone. However, they should still make both of these phones; motorola e815 and nokia 6010. That would make the population happy.
If it were that simple, every phone would be designed to operate at the maximum legal limit. That's not the case, because RF signal performance is much, much more complicated than the simple power output of the radio.