Help... I'm so torn bewteen the 2 companies. My contract is almost up and I don't know where to switch to. I'm in the chicago land area. Any Suggestions??
I have read both forums and everyone has there pros and cons.
...
Ask your friends who live nearby. T-mo's prices really can't be beat, so if they have good coverage where you live and work then go for them. It's really all about the coverage where you're at.
...
See my reply in the at&t forum.
...
Go with t-mobile. I've used it there myself and it works great. I have several friends that have it as well and they go back to Chicago often.
...
Indeed. I've yet to lose a call on T-Mobile's network. at&t on the other hand.............
...
As stated above, just check the coverage where you go the most at T-Mo's website and see if it'll be right for you. I've had both ATT and T-Mo. Everywhere I've needed it, T-Mo performed better than ATT, plus was about 15 bucks cheaper a month.
...
Yes it is cheaper! All the way around.
...
I would say go with T-Mobile too. Coverage is improving, and they're upgrading some of their towers to get ready for 3G service, whenever T-Mobile has plans to launch it for the Chicago market. I'm a VZW user waiting for T-Mobile to launch 3G, and decide from there if I'll like their 3G services. I just wish though they had better rural coverage for Indiana. But AT&T isn't any better in parts of rural Indiana either.
...
I travel around rural indiana and southwestern lower michigan constantly with T-mo and am constantly "scanning the network" for either a Centennial tower that T-mo has an agreement with or an AT&T one. I don't think T-mo has any agreements with AT&T, though (yet, I was told they have agreements with Cingular in some areas, that was when there "was" a Cingular) and yes, my phone did switch in some areas to Cingular. My point: I can always find a tower on AT&T when there is no T-mo network, however, now, there is never an agreement for that tower. So, my feelings are, bar none, AT&T would have better coverage than T-mo in rural Indiana & Michigan. I wish T-mo would either get more agreements with Centennial to use their towers or AT&T, their c...
(continues)
...
shockopera said:
I travel around rural indiana and southwestern lower michigan constantly with T-mo and am constantly "scanning the network" for either a Centennial tower that T-mo has an agreement with or an AT&T one. I don't think T-mo has any agreements with AT&T, though (yet, I was told they have agreements with Cingular in some areas, that was when there "was" a Cingular) and yes, my phone did switch in some areas to Cingular. My point: I can always find a tower on AT&T when there is no T-mo network, however, now, there is never an agreement for that tower. So, my feelings are, bar none, AT&T would have better coverage than T-mo in rural Indiana & Michigan. I wish T-mo would either get more agreements with Centennial
...
(continues)
...
More like GayT&T HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, sorry i couldn't help myself 🤣 🤣 🤣 ,
t-mo works great in chicago
...
dude get tmobile
dnt pay overages for no reason
ive had cingular- ended up paying 400 bucks
wen the contract ended
i had verizon- was paying 150 a month for a lone for only two ppl
i havent had a problem wit tmobile by far
and we pay 99 bucks for 3 ppl including unlimited txt pix and im
get tmobile
...