STRIKE!!!!
I will take great care of your customers.
Thank you Union workers!
February 6 if not then they will be striking.
okccingular said:
The contract has to be in place by
February 6 if not then they will be striking.
the unions ruined the auto industry now they are trying to ruin at&t. nice going cwa
In (slightly less short): Know the facts a bit more, and don't spout half a factoid about something you have no part in and no understanding of, and don't bother the rest of us.
At length: There are a number of reasons why Unions have been maligned over the years, and a good deal of these complaints will be valid. But the overwhelming majority of Unions protect lower-wage earning workers against companies that want to lower wages even more. It's happened far too many times to count. Have their been times when a union has abused the power of it's organization? Of course, but these cases are few & far between. Far more common is for a company or corporation to use it's power of capital and financial influen...
(continues)
japhy said:...
In short: SHUT. UP.
In (slightly less short): Know the facts a bit more, and don't spout half a factoid about something you have no part in and no understanding of, and don't bother the rest of us.
At length: There are a number of reasons why Unions have been maligned over the years, and a good deal of these complaints will be valid. But the overwhelming majority of Unions protect lower-wage earning workers against companies that want to lower wages even more. It's happened far too many times to count. Have their been times when a union has abused the power of it's organization? Of course, but these cases are few & far between. Far more common is for a company or corporation to use it's power
(continues)
crackberry said:
sorry you may have the same insurance as the rest of us. but i wish they could fire those that strike... the union represents laziness and they abuse fmla and get rewarded for 'tenure' only, not because of the amount of work or quality of work they do... i've worked for the company with union and with out and i'd rather stay where i'm at and not be union...
Whoa. . . It's been a while since I've seen "F*** YOU!" stretched to so many words.
Do you realize what an insensitive tool you're being? Make all the generalized statements you want, but don't try to pass them off as anything other than you talking out of your own experience/opinions/@$$. You're wrong about everything you just sa...
(continues)
the union ruined wireless side of att in my opinion cause people got lazy they didn't have to work for raises and felt so protected when they grieved every single little thing they did wrong ...
i was all for the union until i releazed the union wasn't doing **** ,...... i got a few better benefits but whoopty doo ... the hassle and bs they bring to the table is not worth it ......
japhy said:...
Whoa. . . It's been a while since I've seen "F*** YOU!" stretched to so many words.
Do you realize what an insensitive tool you're being? Make all the generalized statements you want, but don't try to pass them off as anything other than you talking out of your own experience/opinions/@$$. You're wrong about everything you just said when it comes to the CWA & AT&T:
If my insurance gets changed, I could lose more than 10% of my annual income to a health care cost increase. When you make $30,000 a year gross, supporting yourself & your family that's a LOT of money to lose. I'm certainly not being lazy - the Union affords me (or anyone else) no protections if I fail to do my job well & get f
(continues)
japhy said:
Please don't $#!+ all over people who think & feel differently than you do, and don't pretend that they might have no valid reason to do so.
You are allowed to call into question his opinion yet he cannot do the same?
by the way, congrats on the new opportunity!
japhy said:
Do you realize what an insensitive tool you're being?
japhy said:
Please don't $#!+ all over people who think & feel differently than you do, and don't pretend that they might have no valid reason to do so.
You are missing the entire point of my reply. His reply was actually pretty informative considering he was in that environment.
He is called a tool for sharing his opinion yet you say people shouldn't **** on others for sharing their opinion?
You would get more run and respect if you did not contradict yourself.
All of that is the subjective opinion of someone who has had negative experiences with Union.
I concede my tone & language aren't necessarily the most conducive to polite discussion, but I'm merely trying to defend the idea that the Union isn't the ultimate antagonist to successful business, as many here seem to believe.
Pay attention to what I'm not saying: "Unions are the best ever an...
(continues)
japhy said:
No, his reply wasn't informative at all, that was my point: he was saying things that were not true, and not coming anywhere close to clarifying them as his opinion...
To you...
You are spouting opinions as well. There are plenty of companies that offer health insurance without the help of a union. There are plenty of companies that offer incentives without a union.
Your example was subjective as well. And of course your example makes sense TO YOU. You wrote the example.
He just described what my friend went through at UPS.
I have to agree with that statement he made, so it isn't just him.
schlittertex said:
Yeah, and I agree with Crackberry, what he said was true, i have worked in that environment, outside of wireless, while i was working through college, and he described it exactly what i went through.
He just described what my friend went through at UPS.
I have to agree with that statement he made, so it isn't just him.
More than a few people experienced this, so what?!?!It's still just several subjective experiences, and those experiences should never be confused with a categorical assessment of the whole situation.
Between this thread and the news thread you are really showing your lack of care of anyone's opinion but your own. Normally it wouldn't matter but then you put your foot in your own mouth by acting as if you are the supreme authority and your opinion is reality and anyone who doubts you is trashing your opinion.
You're deeply wrong about one thing: What I'm showing is not my myopic concern with my opinion, it's my disdain & contempt for a particular brand of opinion orbiting around ignorance of/antipathy towards organized labor.
THAT is why I am engaging with you. You are spouting just as much opinion as anyone else here.
In the economical situation this country is in, I think it would be a mistake to go on strike. In my state 42% of the population is looking for a job. Large corporations have no loyalty to their employees. No matter what our education or capabilities, we are all thr...
(continues)
If my insurance gets changed, I could lose more than 10% of my annual income to a health care cost increase. When you make $30,000 a year gross, supporting yourself & your family that's a LOT of money to lose.
10% of 30,000 is 3,000. That is $8.21 a day. Cut back expenses. Most people are having to do it, and making a LOT less.
BECAUSE OF THE UNION!
Can you at least appreciate why I'm financially/emotionally invested in this issue? 😉
texaswireless said:
Minimal education to get the job. Minimal education to keep the job. Why exactly should AT&T pay those expenses for unskilled labor and raise the cost of their product?
And yet, it's still not an easy job to do well. Not in the stores, not in the call centers. The entrance requirements might be low, low, low (in part to fill seats because it's developed a reputation for being notably ugly work), but there is a lot of information to assimilate. Furthermore, it takes tact and diplomacy at all levels - something many a fancy MBA has utterly failed to master.
You can TRY filling it with the bottom of the barrel, using the good old 'use them up, burn them out, throw them away, start ove...
(continues)
In my mind I think AT&T could actually pay their best people more and hire more intelligence from the beginning but that CANT'T because of the inherent goals of a union. They can't take the risk because the system doesn't allow them to get rid of people who don't pan out or who lose that motivation.
It is scary to have to tell you this but when you join a conversation late and make assumptions you usually end up looking like a fool.
texaswireless said:
And again, someone who joins late and misses the entire point of the argument.
In my mind I think AT&T could actually pay their best people more and hire more intelligence from the beginning but that CANT'T because of the inherent goals of a union. They can't take the risk because the system doesn't allow them to get rid of people who don't pan out or who lose that motivation.
It is scary to have to tell you this but when you join a conversation late and make assumptions you usually end up looking like a fool.
Bravo Sierra, Skippy. YOU said (either deliberately or inadvertently; in the latter case I have sincere sympathy for your inability to communicate) that AT&T's frontline wo...
(continues)
I stuck it up. I have no idea what stuck it up means, something done in the past tense I suppose. But you must be right.
Just because your union has gotten you better than the average compensation does not mean you are entitled to maintain that in a recession. Be thankful for what you have.
Regarding the argumentation that's going on ehre, my problem is twofold:
- those folks would say: "This particular strike is a bad idea, ergo: Organized Labor is inherently corrupt. My poor experience with a union supports my premise." There's a lot of that going on.
- AT&T is potentially making deep cuts to employee benefits (they certainly want to) despite spectacular profits having been acheived last year. There would be a significant financial cut to everyone's paycheck.
The latter point is less likely to happen, and doesn't concern me as much.
Face it, when the economy is in a slump, the status quo is not something you can count on. When unemployment is up, having a job that pays better than most AND has benefits is a blessing.
Companies can and will make cutbacks, it is their right to do so. It is a union's choice to oppose it, but it's a risk. A strike will certainly not cripple AT&T. Yes it will put a strain on them in certain areas, and yes some people will have to take up the slack...but those people will have a paych...
(continues)
Do you have an advanced degree and you are settling for this position?
You may not like to hear this but you are NOT a skilled worker. You can be replaced. While YOU may be very good at your job you cannot say with a straight face that all of your colleages display the same drive and determination.
If you didn't have a union AT&T could get rid of them and give YOU a raise but the goal of a union is to gain benefits for a body, not an individual. Unions restrict personal advancement through hard work. THAT is a fact. They must do that to keep many employed to keep their power.
(continues)
And alot of the profits go to the executives...who, by the way, USUALLY ARE THEMSELVES SHAREHOLDERS!!
score 1 for democracy -1 for communism
There are lots of businesses out there that really would be ruined by a union (hear that? I'm not so stupid as to think it's always a good idea), just as there's an infinite number of rights that have been earned for the working American by organized labor. That most people aren't aware fo the history of labor is partly a failure of education, but it's also due to the efforts of large corporations that have a vested interest in keeping employees in the dark about ...
(continues)
Okay well i have read numerous books, considering i am working on my second Bachelor's (one in Psychology already, the second in Accounting).
maybe you should read "the road to serfdom" or "atlas shrugged", those are two books people need to read.
if the unions (as a whole) were so great, how come there have been mass exodus of states to southern right to work states? Unions cut out competative wages, even though they say that is what they are fighting for.
...
(continues)
schlittertex said:
Okay well i have read numerous books, considering i am working on my second Bachelor's (one in Psychology already, the second in Accounting).
maybe you should read "the road to serfdom" or "atlas shrugged", those are two books people need to read.
Double major in Theology & Anthropology right here, and spent a year & a half doing lit/journalism before that. I know a whole hell of a lot when it comes to preachy fundamentalism, be it conservative Christians or Ayn Rand's whack-@$$ objectivism. I've not read Road to Serfdom, but anyone associated with Reaganomics can. . . well, I defer you to the President's assessment of that school of economic thought. And I invite you to look at ...
(continues)
I don't have to offer health insurance but I do.
I don't have to pay above minimum wage but I do.
I don't have to offer paid vacation but I do.
Yeah all companies are just the devil. And I don't think you should be quoting your precious President when he has less than 30 days in office. The people did not vote against the policies of tax and business incentives to create jobs. Obamas voting base was mostly people that pay little or no taxes because he promised them socialist support from the government.
texaswireless said:
Double major? Which means you haven't earned that degree yet have you?
I don't have to offer health insurance but I do.
I don't have to pay above minimum wage but I do.
I don't have to offer paid vacation but I do.
Yeah all companies are just the devil. And I don't think you should be quoting your precious President when he has less than 30 days in office. The people did not vote against the policies of tax and business incentives to create jobs. Obamas voting base was mostly people that pay little or no taxes because he promised them socialist support from the government.
preach!
planning on running for anything? i'll move back to texas to vote for you...
I am in Dallas this weekend looking at houses for the family and finalizing property decisions.
You would just have to jump ship to Verizon :-)
ccareatatt said:
Have fun taking the 600 calls in queue and working until they are all cleared out. 😲 😳 Yes I went there. Our call center averages 8000 calls a day... 🙂
There you go... ruining their fantasy with facts. Heartless bastard. ;)
durkadurkha said:
go on strike! I work for one of at&t's outsourcing centers here in st. louis! I'm going to be the first scab they hire and I'M going to love it! I'll throw pennies at your poor butt with that $34 an hour i'll be making for crossing "the Line" 😛
score 1 for democracy -1 for communism
What a marvelous example of humanity.
(continues)
Please go to this link:
http://cwa-attmobility.com »
I live in Idaho (no unions) and am too young to know anything about em.
So how bout it? What's the exact defintion of a union?
What's the benefit of being in one?
What's required?
Why doesn't Idaho have one?
And will this strike affect any outsourced employees working AT&T?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_union »
For info on this specific AT&T/CWA labor dispute, go here:
http://www.cwa-union.org/att/mobility/ »
Obviously, there's plenty more information out there, most of it won't apply to this particular situation, and a good deal of what you read will be subjective.
First, all the experienced reps will be out (in union areas) leaving managers which haven't touched OPUS or a customers account in who knows how long.
Second, customer will wonder if they'll get some type of discount since the level of support is going down.
Third, I would assume some union people would want to call to make it seem the hold times are longer for customers that are actually calling in for help. (nothing official but it makes sense)
AT&T sales positions are well above minimum wage paying jobs that include benefits.
Walk into Wal-Mart or your favorite fast food chain and expect the same pay and benefits and you will see just how good it is.
Cut backs are better than layoffs. Getting what the unions ask for might come at the cost of jobs. Better to make a little less during the hard times than nothing at all.
Just because a company makes big profits is not an entitlement for salespeople. If you want to benefit from a company's profit, invest in the company.
Companies reinvest their funds into their systems. Great sales people cannot sell a service if it is drastically i...
(continues)
taoareyou said:...
AT&T sales positions are entry level, no college or special certifications required.
AT&T sales positions are well above minimum wage paying jobs that include benefits.
Walk into Wal-Mart or your favorite fast food chain and expect the same pay and benefits and you will see just how good it is.
Cut backs are better than layoffs. Getting what the unions ask for might come at the cost of jobs. Better to make a little less during the hard times than nothing at all.
Just because a company makes big profits is not an entitlement for salespeople. If you want to benefit from a company's profit, invest in the company.
Companies reinvest their funds into their systems. Great sales people cannot s
(continues)
Tell the CEO that made 24 million in 2007 and 20 million in 2008.
(continues)
(continues)
(continues)
NEW YORK - It was a devastating day for AT&T on the market floor today with shares plummeting out of control. Panic raged across Wall Street while some just stood in awe and watched the board.
Senior analysts confirmed that a forum thread on the Internet was to blame.
"I told them to stop! I warned them. But they didn't listen to me," stated man in military fatigues who wished to remain anonymous.
I am generally ambivalent about Unions. Sometimes they're a good idea. Sometimes they're not. I DO figure it's probably not a good idea for AT&T to pull benefits from its line employees (shooting themselves in the foot in the long run, so a bunch of fat cats can sell their stocks on the uptick in the short run, near as I can figure) and I don't blame the CWA for striking under these circumstances. I am neither in a position to be reprimanded by the CWA nor AT&T for this opinion (and the latter can reap the whirlwind for their own stupidity). Frankly, they can both kiss my frosty Canuck arse...
(continues)