Sprint takes on Cingular, takes on Sprint.
(continues)
(continues)
But that's not what this is about. At all.
The companies are starting to "challenge" each other over data and facts, not consumer opinion. Where is the proof that Cingular has the fewest dropped calls? Nobody has seen it, really. And where is the proof that Sprint has the most powerful network? Who knows?
And so, the battle begins...
my heads towards cingular in this battle.
i have a phone from cingular, sprint, vzw, and t-mo.
cingular and verizon come out on top. verizon being second because they drop calls on certain roads where even t-mobile has coverage.
sprint, then t-mobile. outdoor coverage with sprint is great but indoors sucks. i get no love at the mall, 1-2 bars at my house, and in scarce areas its spotty. i.e. out near a park in my area or a lake.
its almost the same with t-mobile. their indoor coverage is a little better but in scare areas its spotty. i.e. same park or lake.
(my judgement comes from personal road trip and travels that span fro...
(continues)
I too would put my money on Cingular in this one. That is actually one of the reasons I found this story to be so interesting. Cingular must have plenty of confidence in their claim if they were aggressive enough to bypass the BBB and file an official lawsuit against Sprint.
I for one have no problem with belieiving their claim. I have had all the majors, except for T-Mobile (because I was never brave enough to put up with spotty coverage), and I have found Cingular to be the best (for myself).
I would, in general, put Cingular and Verizon at the same level from my travles. But as for the general area that I live, Cingular is superior in buildings and doesn't have the isolated dead spots that I have encount...
(continues)
1) your hoping the other will back down
and
2) since they didn't back down, you can't back down either.
but that's just me.
I've tried tmob and cing, they both don't work in my house neither does usc, but sprint does 😉
itt said:
I disagree companies are stupid enough thinking a "research company" is actual fact when it isn't. If they want actually proof i say gather 10% of each carriers network put then in a room and have them answer some questionaire. Then maybe they would have a case. Other then that when your going to call someone out it's
1) your hoping the other will back down
and
2) since they didn't back down, you can't back down either.
but that's just me.
I've tried tmob and cing, they both don't work in my house neither does usc, but sprint does 😉
if you are saying that a "research company" isnt actual fact......what is j.d. powers?
they do something completely simular to what you sug...
(continues)
even the integraty of a few of my local news stations my not be upholdable.......2 of them get huge @$$ discounts from cingular and vzw. 😳
CAnt wait to see his wins! Either way, one of these companies is going to eat their words and puke out unhappy customers! 🤣
It is my opinion that Cingular will lose any arguments over this issue:
"...But Telephia also said it had "no knowledge of the specific methodology (markets, time periods or statistical thresholds) Cingular used to reach the nationwide 'lowest dropped call' conclusion."
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/03/business/media/03a ... »
RUFF1415 said:...
I totally agree with you.
I too would put my money on Cingular in this one. That is actually one of the reasons I found this story to be so interesting. Cingular must have plenty of confidence in their claim if they were aggressive enough to bypass the BBB and file an official lawsuit against Sprint.
I for one have no problem with belieiving their claim. I have had all the majors, except for T-Mobile (because I was never brave enough to put up with spotty coverage), and I have found Cingular to be the best (for myself).
I would, in general, put Cingular and Verizon at the same level from my travles. But as for the general area that I live, Cingular is superior in buildings and doesn't have the isol
(continues)
I will say that Sprint and Cingular seemed to work better than Verizon when I took a trip to SoCal last summer.
not only is it hillarious, but lets be real, sprints network isnt anything special.
Based on what?
Keep in mind i said probably. but I imagine that is atleast something that shouldnt' be hard to prove. Maybe the word "leading" is a bit.......misleading. they could have said "a top research company" or "major".
I can't wait for this lawsuit to end. I hope all the carriers get caught with their pants down looking like idiots. I'm so sick of their competing with stupid slogans.
I really still feel that Cingular should have kept the term: "Cingular: Fits you best" rather than "raising the bar". Over the top claims really only i...
(continues)