Got a vent, ATT really does suck!!!
This is not unique to AT&T. Not every Telco is eager to lose money on crediting the ETF for your subsidized equipment.
andy2373 said:
https://www.phonescoop.com/forums/forum.php?fm=m&ff= ... »
👿 👿 👿 👿 👿
AT&T has had major network issues in the last year. I looked up articles on it, and in my area we have real spotty coverage as it is.
I love their phones, but the network is subpar.
Sorry you are having problems. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me.
Both AT&T and Verizon have 3G coverage all around Seattle and the surrounding areas. AT&T has recently announced they will be offering LTE (4G) in 2011 as well and they have 700 MHz spectrum licenses in Seattle. AT&T doesn't need to launch LTE as quickly as Verizon does, because AT&T's 3G network goes far beyond anything Verizon's EV-DO can do. Verizon is in a bind with speed and they need to act fast to catch up.
I am comparing network technologies, and I am well aware that in some places Verizon has EV-DO where AT&T still has EDGE.
Sure, now my 3G is gone but I still got plenty of EDGE coverage. I couldn't even check my E-mail on EDGE.
I just want to end my contract without an ETF because ATT's 3G signal doesn't penetrate into the depths of this building. Where I was before it did, barely but it worked.
Their coverage maps says I should have 3G, but I don't. Now you want me to pay you to cancel my contract because you can no longer provide me with what you said you would...and did. 😡
It doesn't matter what carrier it is, I'd expect the same thing from any of them.
andy2373 said:
You said EDGE, what a joke. 🤣
Sure, now my 3G is gone but I still got plenty of EDGE coverage. I couldn't even check my E-mail on EDGE.
Ok, if you can't check your e-mail on EDGE then either there is something wrong with your phone or you have no idea what the hell you are doing. I'm not sure if you remember, but there was this certain iPhone that was out for a year that only had EDGE. It had an e-mail application on it, how do you think that worked?
Do you know what a BlackBerry 8700 is? A BlackBerry 8100? AN 8300? Don't forget 8800. Another thing called the HTC 8125, Palm 600, 650, 680, 685, Nokia 9300, E62, HP 6925. Do you know what these phones have in common? I'll g...
(continues)
there is something wrong with your phone or you have no idea what the hell you are doing.
WOW, I’m truly jealous. You obviously have more time then sense. Did you even read the original post? There’s no mention of a phone…my troubles are with an ATT data card. 😲
But just to piss you off more, I think ATT is quickly becoming the next Sprint. 😈
andy2373 said:
There’s no mention of a phone…my troubles are with an ATT data card. 😈
If you cant figure out how to check your e-mail with a data card, this is much more painful than i had previously thought.
AshDizzle said:
If you cant figure out how to check your e-mail with a data card, this is much more painful than i had previously thought.
Oh I can figure it out. I just can't figure out why ATT's network has begun to suck so bad lately.
I rather have 3G speeds everywhere I go then EDGE speeds. Oh, and My storm beat the iPhone 3G in a speed test... IN THE APPLE STORE!
Plus, all the Apple workers want a iPhone on Verizon. The manager even has Verizon as you service and iPod Touch for his music. Why? AT&Ts network is HORRIBLE.
Tonight just ain't workin' for ya', huh Dizz?
VZW611LA said:
Verizon has MORE 3G tho. Oh, and LESS problems. 🤣
I rather have 3G speeds everywhere I go then EDGE speeds. Oh, and My storm beat the iPhone 3G in a speed test... IN THE APPLE STORE!
Plus, all the Apple workers want a iPhone on Verizon. The manager even has Verizon as you service and iPod Touch for his music. Why? AT&Ts network is HORRIBLE.
Tonight just ain't workin' for ya', huh Dizz?
in theory umts (and it's upgrades) is much better than evdo because of voice and data being able to be done simultaneous. i just think apple didn't know how poor at&t's network was ran before the agreement was reached.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090513/0947594868 ... »
http://gigaom.com/2009/03/16/why-won%E2%80%99t-att-a ... »
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10249997-56.html »
Most of these links are opinions and speculations. But as an AT&T user, I can tell you that coverage is spotty, especially in my area where I am supposed to have stellar coverage.
I remember back when AT&T Wireless had massive network issues that dragged on and on, which eventually led to its demise.
Burger Time said:
I remember back when AT&T Wireless had massive network issues that dragged on and on, which eventually led to its demise.
AT&T Wireless' network was a nightmare. AT&T Mobility is still working on fixing what it took over. Most complaints I see on blogs come from west coast users, where AT&T wireless was dominant, and where there is a surplus of 1900 MHz frequency where AT&T wireless should have invested in 850.
crackberry said:
the at&t wireless network in all of the west cost was 850. cingular and t-mobile built a 1900 network together and then cingular moved their customers off the 1900 network to the 850 network they got from at&t wireless... they spun off their 1900 network to t-mobile in exchange for new york network...and network integration was completed in 2006. so it's taken 3 years fix something that cingular, not at&t wireless broke? no. it's been poor management and one mishap after another with network planning since 'the new' at&t and de la vega has made that has been the nightmare...
My family had Cingular for years, and once it became the New Tastes great less filling AT&T, my family saw a drop ...
(continues)
If you like that overpriced, phone-crippling, don't give a rat's *** about their customers company then good for you. That does not make them the best, just the best for you. Some of us are very happy with AT&T. Some of us get great coverage and call quality and quality phones with AT&T. So stop shooting off your opinions with those who do not care, and go back to the Verizon worshipers where you be...
(continues)
XXX said:
If you like that overpriced, phone-crippling, don't give a rat's *** about their customers company
just a side note, from a former at&t employee, at&t does the same thing.
XXX said:
If you like that overpriced, phone-crippling, don't give a rat's *** about their customers life.
Last time I checked, Verizons prices are the same. Also, Verizons coverage beats AT&T in Voice and Data. And if they didn't care about us, then WHY do we have Top Rating Customer Service? Next, nothing is crippled about our phones. It just seems like you have nothing els to do but complain about another wireless network that is better than yours.
Its sad that you pay the same price as us Verizon customers do, but get poor coverage with AT&T.
crackberry said:
they screwed up the plmn
Do you even know what a PLMN is? How exactly did they "screw up" the PLMN?
It is getting more evident to me that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
VZW611LA said:
Thats why there customer service rating is
L
O
W
Is that also why your ability to distinguish between "there" and "their" is low as well?
crackberry said:
yes i do know what it is... and the fact that you claim to know so much and are ignorant to what happened shows you are either in denial or you really don't pay attention when you're at work.
Ah yes, you're right, sir. I guess I wasn't paying attention when it was announced you made something up. How could I have been so blind?
If you're just going to make claims without backing it up by evidence, don't even talk.
I'm thinking that you might have had enough experience to see PLMN in a RIM escreen and decide to just use that term in a phonescoop argument, therefore increasing your status in society. Unfortunately for you, it does not work.
Well, it does work for your bestie, V...
(continues)
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=10 ... »
http://www.engadget.com/2004/03/07/engadget-exclusiv ... »
However, your post does not accurately depict what happened. In fact it may be the most confusing post I have ever read.