Phone Scoop

printed September 2, 2014
See this page online at:
http://www.phonescoop.com/carriers/forum.php?fm=m&ff=2&fi=3203578

Home  ›  Carriers  ›

Verizon Wireless

Info & Phones News Reviews › Forum  

Back to message list

Replying to:  Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH) by gacollege   Oct 22, 2012, 4:34 PM

Re: Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH)

by DialUpWifi    Nov 3, 2012, 3:38 PM

Heres my two cents:

I've lived in Montana for the last 4 years, working for a Verizon retailer the entire time. Our biggest struggle out here is reception, as I'm sure you can imagine. So Motorola has always been our "Go To" phone for reception. I actually asked one of the Moto Venders a while back as to why Moto tends to have the best reception. His answer was that most the hardware on our Switch is Motorola made, so they work together seamlessly. I don’t understand how it would make any difference, but hey, I'm no engineer. I just sell the phones and learn whatever I can about them.

Now in saying all that, we have recently come across something interesting (In the past year). HTC has been running a part of its antenna to the back door of the phone, behind all the hardware and battery. I haven’t seen any definitive evidence that this technique actually improves reception in real world applications, but I found it interesting enough to share Smile

-SG

Report to moderator

Replies

No replies to this message


Reply You must log in to reply.

Back to message list

‹ all carrier forums

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Twitter Phone Scoop on Facebook Phone Scoop on Google+ Subscribe to Phone Scoop on YouTube Follow on Instagram

 

All content Copyright 2001-2014 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.
1